My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

Weird?

34 replies

Quasilulu · 03/05/2016 00:37

My friend is expecting her first baby, a girl. Her OH has 2 previous children. He eants to call them a combination of their names eg Michael and Kayla Michaela. Not that but hope you get my drift. My friend is wondering if this is weird or not. I personally think it is a bit. Your views?

OP posts:
Report
MattDillonsPants · 03/05/2016 01:40

Very, very silly.

Like those houses you see called things like "Joantom" and "Salsteven"

Naff, naff, naffity naff.

Report
manicinsomniac · 03/05/2016 10:08

I think it would depend on the what the 'mixture name' is. Michaela is a perfectly normal kind of name so I think it's fine. If it ended up being something more like Renesmee then no!

Report
honeysucklejasmine · 03/05/2016 10:09

Michaela is a perfectly normal name. Is that what it would be?

Report
FellOutOfBedTwice · 03/05/2016 10:10

You actually could legitimately put mine and my husbands names together and make Flora. I wouldn't name a child that but it's a legitimate name at least. However if my name was Stacey and his name was Ronald and our potential child's name was Roncey or Stanald... Well that's a different kettle of fish and shit!

Report
mouldycheesefan · 03/05/2016 10:14

Michaela is a fine name by itself but sure Michael, kayla and Michaela sounds naff

Report
IWILLgiveupsugar · 03/05/2016 10:15

It's not just his baby though - does he not think his partner might like a say in the name of her own baby,rather than having some possibly weird combination?

He needs to get a grip, although I do see that he is possibly trying to include his kids in the arrival of a new half sibling. If I was the exw I wouldn't like this much either.

Report
AHintOfStyle · 03/05/2016 10:18

I think OP means he would then have 3 children called:
Michael
Kayla
Michaela

Which is a bit weird no?

Report
Veterinari · 03/05/2016 10:20

Bayreuth the new baby deserves a name of her own

Report
mouldycheesefan · 03/05/2016 11:42

Even worse if name is spelled Mike-kayla

Surely his new partner doesn't want her child called a combination of thr names of his children with his ex partner?

Report
HighDataUsage · 03/05/2016 11:55

Bit Jeremy Kyle style....

Report
OnceMoreIntoTheBleach · 03/05/2016 12:07

Horrible idea IMO on many levels as already stated by PP, but apart from all that, I personally think babies deserve their OWN name and identity.

We lost a significant family member when I was heavily pregnant with DS and lots of people asked if we would name him after that person. It was a resounding 'no'. I vetoed the idea of family names with both my DCs from the outset.

They are new people who deserve a name that is all theirs, IMO.

Each to their own though, of course.

Report
Quasilulu · 03/05/2016 13:33

Thank you! I've shown her this and she's going to show her OH. She's also said I can share the names so Stephen Melanie and Stephanie...which she dislikes anyway. Sorry chap...You're outnumbered 😂

OP posts:
Report
WhyCantIuseTheNameIWant · 03/05/2016 13:38

Stephenie in its own is quite sweet.

No way with Stephen though!

Report
Arfarfanarf · 03/05/2016 13:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SerenityReynolds · 03/05/2016 13:45

Agreed it's a weird thing to do. The new baby is an individual in her own right. Not an amalgam of her half-siblings!

Report
GunShotResidue · 03/05/2016 13:49

I think it would be quite sweet as a middle name. DD has similar, a mix of her Grandmothers names (which is also a real name).

I love family names but would only use them as middle names. As a pp said, babies should have their own first name.

Report
LadyAntonella · 03/05/2016 14:05

I guess maybe he's trying to make his existing DCs feel included(?) which is understandable, but I don't think it's a great idea myself. I agree with pps re babies having their own identity. I know someone who was going to name their DS after their DD's favourite toy. Thankfully her favourite toy is a teddy bear so the DS would have been Teddy which is a nice name anyway. Could just have easily been My Little Pony Grin. They went with something else completely in the end.

Report
1horatio · 03/05/2016 14:38

I think that's a bit odd... But we are going to use my mum's initial for the 2 middle names (the middle names will start with the same letter), so I'm probably not the one that should say this is riduculous Smile
As long as it's a real name it's ok imo.

Report
diddl · 03/05/2016 14:51

Maybe the siblings could choose a middle name to feel included?

Report
elor11 · 03/05/2016 20:08

Very silly. Maybe would be nice as a middle. But come up with something yourself. Not a combination of his ex's fav names.

Report
AwfulBeryl · 03/05/2016 20:12

I love the name Stephanie, although that's completely irrelevant. I don't really like the idea of having children with similar sounding names and Stephanie is way too similar to Stephen.

Report
Stripedduvet · 03/05/2016 22:56

Stephanie is one of my top girls names.
But if I had a son called Stephen already I wouldn't call my daughter Stephanie. That's weird. Though I know a family with kids called Jack and Jackie!! Lot of people do these things!

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

julfin · 03/05/2016 23:34

I agree it's weird.

Now that we've all agreed on that, please can we turn the conversation to what our children would be called if we combined our own names with our partners'? Mine would be Jett - which has a certain ring to it.

Report
Quasilulu · 04/05/2016 00:36

Ha ha Julfin! Mine would be Embert! Awful!

OP posts:
Report
Oysterbabe · 04/05/2016 05:15

At least it's a real name. But agree with others- no.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.