ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
to address a woman in a formal letter as "Ms"?(290 Posts)
Here's the problem; as a solicitor the formal way to address correspondence is "Dear sirs/your faithfully" or "Dear (insert as appropriate)/yours sincerely". But I often have to write to a woman without knowing what title she has given herself-so do I use Ms? I dont want to assume anything obviously, so I can't use Miss or Mrs, so what would people prefer?
Yup, Hi Firstname is the standard greeting around here too. But we're an informal bunch.
I'd use "Dear Dr/Prof Bloggs" the first time I wrote to someone external, but if they wrote back "Hi Annie" and signed off "Regards, Jane", then my next message would start with "Hi Jane".
I only ever use Ms, as does my sister who although married has retained her maiden name. Mrs sounds like my mother or MIL.
I don't like the use of a title and I especially disliked Mrs when I was married but I wouldn't complain, you can't please everybody all of the time!
I would never go as far as a smiley face, but Hi is definitely standard in my line of work, both as a client myself and as a supplier of services.
With the clients the first email is Dear, follow-ups are Hi. I take my lead from them to an extent though, if they make first contact with me using Hi then I will respond with it too. I would hate it if we all just started with Firstname, it really does sound abrupt to me. I guess it would be fine from a solicitor or someone you do have formal relationships with, but our client relationshiops are as informal as our internal ones.
Whoknows, I absolutely HATE "hi first name" on a work email, even if it's an internal email from the colleague in the next room. Far too informal. I had a trainee who did it and, horror of horrors, sometimes signed off with a smiley face. We nipped that in the bud. I'd get in real trouble if I addressed my clients with "Hi", even the ones I know very well.
I don't like emails that just start with my first name, it seems a bit blunt in tone, especially if the sender than proceeds to ask you to do something, it definitely raises my hackles. I work in a fairly informal business and Hi WhoKnows is the standard email opening. I stick to Dear on more formal ones on the odd occasion that I need to write one.
I frequently start emails without the "Dear" but I do keep the person's first name, so
Thank you for your email....."
I haven't really thought through why we still use "Dear" on a formal letter, as more and more we use email for very formal advice to our clients, it's not just for things like agreeing a meeting time.
However "Dear Sirs" is just the convention for inter-partes correspondence.
"Sirs" reminds me of that covention for "Letters to the Editor" in newspapers i.e.
I read with great interest the piece by Joe Bloggs on Tuesday relating to the use of misogynistic address forms in the legal sector..."
Twattock, great that you have started the use of "Mesdames" - perhaps one day it will appear in Wikipedia as a seminal moment in the history of inter law firm communication.
Indeed, keep us posted.
Another thought that I don't think anyone has mentioned on this thread, which could be more widely adopted and sidesteps the whole "how to start a letter" problem. I drafted a letter for an MP to send to a minister a few months ago, and the MP kindly copied me in on the final version. I'd started it "dear XXXX". MP just deleted the whole "dear" bit from the top before sending it. I've seen that done a few times in a government/Civil Service context. It's obvious who the letter is addressed to, because the name and address are at the top, and it gets round the whole question of how formal/familiar to be.
Me, too, twattock. You started a great thread here. Keep us posted.
Hey twattock, I'll be very interested in the results of your experiment.
you're going to hate me for this but somehow it seems wrong...
"Sirs, Mesdames", seems better or "Dear Sirs, Mesdames"
like "Ladies and Gentlemen" is good but "Dear Ladies and Gentlemen" isn't
It's the "dear" followed by "and" that seems wrong somehow.
the first "dear sirs and mesdames" letters went out tonight. it will be interesting to see if anyone a) notices b) comments. I shall let you all know!
And my married name, for all of its 4 letters, still seems difficult for some people to grasp. I'm amazed every time.
Well obviously not, seeker. My dad, brother and step-mum (though of course she's not a man) all have the same bizarre surname. Traditionally, it was just not possible for men to get rid of them on marriage. Now, thanks to feminism, they can! Hurrah!
I like my awkward, cumberson, hard to spell name
I used to like the fact that, 'cos of the way I shorten my first name and I refused to put titles on to my letters/memos/telex (before the days of email ) in my first (and subsequent) jobs, people used to expect a German male and would get me!
My boss had an argument with a colleague on my behalf. he was sorting out business cards and wanted to make me put a title on "'cos otherwise people wouldn't know what sex I was" . My boss pointed out that as business cards tend to get handed out in person
and I was a slim, attractive graduate recruit , if they hadn't worked out what sex I was by then, they had bigger problems!
No, Tolliver, you've got it wrong! Men all have lovely euphonious last names that women can't wait to change their horrid ones for.
Nah, my brothers and my dad have one too... And my male cousins, not one of whom over the last umpty-something years has managed to give any of their children a name that I think works at all well with my surname.
I wish wish wish that I'd been given my mother's maiden name, by itself or double-barrelled. Then the DCs would have that alone or double-barrelled with DH's. In fact almost any other name from anywhere on my family tree (except for my paternal grandmother's maiden name, which would count as child cruelty if anyone double-barrelled it with DH's) would do. My mother says that she didn't realise when she married that keeping her own name, let alone passing it on to her children, was even an option -- and given that this was back when a married woman routinely needed to get her husband's permission to do almost anything I'm not surprised she thought that way.
Although you have added to the bizarrely large number of women who appear to have last names that are awkward to say, cumbersome and difficult to spell and which only women have!
Jessie - indeed, my unmarried name was my dad's. And my grand-dad's etc etc and so on back through time. But I can't change how they inherited their name, only what I call myself. It's the name I was born with and grew up with. It's mine.
If it weren't such a bugger to spell/pronounce (one of the reasons I was so happy to get rid of it when I married) I'd get the DD's names changed too. But for all its awkwardness, I miss it and want it back!
Jessie - he pupils up here (north-east Scotland NEVER address their teachers as just 'Miss' even if they call themselves that, the title is always followed by the surname. I recall one of my classmates from England addressing a Mrs Geography teacher as just 'Miss' and he got pretty short shrift on the grounds that she had an individual name and title and would he please have the courtesy to use it!
I know that the Sir/Miss thing is a Central Belt occurence but it doesn't extend this far north.when pupils address female teachers quickly it sometimes does all merge into a 'Misbeveridge' (Ms is usually pronounced with a soft z up here) to the untrained ear whether Mrs, Miss or Ms but the distinction is still there as you can see when they have to write your name on something.
In fact, out of the classroom they are far more likely to refer to all female teachers as 'The Wifie Beveridge'whether married or not! (It's aDoric thing [local dialect])
Mind you, I was under the impression for ages that ds had a teacher called Miss Dunoon- I was very confused when I met Mr. Noon.....
I loathe Sir and Miss - what's so hard about remembering the relevant surname and title? There's the obvious lack of parity between the two terms, and then the way it makes references sound so generic and impersonal: 'Miss told me to give it to Sir - not you Miss, the other Miss'.
Although it does seem to mean that children, when they do have to use a surname for a female teacher, just automatically convert all their teachers to something pronounced somewhere in between Miss and Ms, like 'Missss' which trails off as they realise they don't know whether the teacher is actually Miss, Mrs or Ms!
I remember asking my Mum aged five (in the early seventies) why the head teacher was known as Ms. She told me because it was nobody's business whether a woman was married or not. I thought that was a reasonable answer given that my mother is a proud non-feminist.
Don't understand where these myths about Ms denoting divorce have come from.
Sir and Miss drive me demented. My male colleague gets a title which suggests social elevation whereas I get an infantile one.
I am a Mrs but wouldnt be offended by a Ms, although I userstand historically what it inferred.
It strikes me as a bit stupid we havent done away with it and just do Master/Mr and Miss/Ms - it would simplify things massively.
Its almost like "whooohoooo I have a successful marriage, call me Mrs"
when I was married I always used Ms. I was young so it was assumed I was a Miss now it is assumed I am a Mrs I always correct people
I do not belong to someone
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.