“If social services want to restrict parental rights they have to seek permission from a court. Otherwise parents retain all rights. It is long overdue that parents take legal action against a school for doing this.”
This is v similar to an issue highlighted by a parent in Scotland who has obtained a legal opinion from a QC & sent to to John Swinney to challenge the same concerns in Scotland where the LGBT Youth Scotland guide was funded by scotgov.
This is an exert from the times story on it:
LGBTYS has stated that article 16 of UNCRC ensures a child’s right to privacy and that “if a young person comes out as transgender there is no immediate need to inform their parents or others”.
O’Neill argues that this interpretation ignores the wider context of the UNCRC, which emphasises the importance of family life.
He also argues that article 8 of the ECHR establishes a child’s right to privacy “within their family and home, not from their family and home . . . parents have the right to be kept informed by schools about matters relating to their child’s development and wellbeing.
“No child has a universal or absolute veto on what can and cannot responsibly be discussed with or revealed to their parents by their school.”
Link here to article