Taking inspiration from this quote from Finn's speech at FiL:
But however men are involved in this movement, I suggest one place they should certainly not be is in the leadership, because I believe that women should lead and direct the women?s movement. And this is a political stance, one all too often reduced to so-called ?man-hating? by those who do not appreciate the grand scale of woman-hating that goes uncommented and unchecked in our society on a daily basis.
And in order to not further derail this thread I am wondering why the Mother's Union has a man as its Chief Executive.
I expressed my point of view on that thread that the mother's union should have a mother (a woman) as it's CEO.
Someone asked "Why does it matter whether the chief executive is a man?"
Well I feel saddened that with millions of mothers in this country as possible candidates a charity called mother's union chose a man.
Looking into some of the history of the charity from their website:
Mary Sumner, the founder of Mothers' Union and herself a mother of three, was all too aware of the burdens and responsibilities of parenting; of the feelings of inadequacy that could swamp young mothers.
1876: When her daughter, Margaret, had her first child Mary took the initial steps in founding a society for the support of women in their role as mothers. Mary recognised that good parenting was more than providing for the physical needs of the child, and she believed that the primary responsibility was to raise children in the love of God.
1896: The Central Council of Mothers' Union was formed and the first Central Constitution was agreed unifying members across diocese, into a national union with Mary Sumner as President. Members agreed objectives and a central vision that marriage, parenting and prayer were key to the future of families.
1900: Mary's connections within the Anglican Communion led to Mothers' Union branches quickly being established in Wales, Ely, Exeter, Hereford, Lichfield and Newcastle, followed by branches overseas in Dublin, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Canada, India and Madagascar. By 1900 the Mothers Union had nearly 170,000 members.
So it seems to me that it was set up by a mother, for mothers...
I also think that feminist movements should be run by women and I'd be interested to see whether any have this enshrined in their constitution - eg Fawcett Society and whether that falls fowl of any equality laws .
Thoughts anyone?
And anyone with info on the constitutions of various organisations and how this fits in with the equality act etc.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Women should lead and direct the women's movement
93 replies
tabouleh · 07/12/2010 18:23
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
dittany ·
08/12/2010 12:05
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.