How can we convince her to let SD come to our house without legal action?(35 Posts)
I've posted about something similar before, my BF has a 4yo daughter and his ex is refusing to let her come to our house. It looks like legal action is inevitable but I was wondering, if you were in her shoes, what would it take for you to accept the situation and let her visit and stop over? Is it just going to take time and hoping she realises it's what's best for their daughter? Or would things like photos of the house and her bedroom, a letter, books she can read to her about the fact they're not together any more, would these things help or make it worse?
She was almost coming round but then she found that I had been there on one of BFs access days and she threatened to stop access all together.
I know there's nothing I can do, I'm just trying to be supportive to BF, but I'd like to be able to offer him some ideas for easing the tension.
Thanks Dahlen, I hope so.
I don't understand your BF's behaviour in all this. If things have deteriorated to this extent already, he really doesn't have anything to lose by adopting a full and honest disclosure policy. Not wanting to rock the boat is a bit of a cop out. It makes him sound really passive and not like a good dad TBH. Wild horses wouldn't stop me doing whatever it took if it was me in his situation. You seem to be making more effort than he is (which means you'll probably make a great step mum ).
The timescale involved here is really important. If it's relatively recently, patience and understanding will go a long way. If it's several years down the line then getting serious and using the courts is the only way you will resolve this. How long has it been since they split?
If the child doesn't settle well with her Dad it's because he isn't getting overnight contact! A lot of the 'caring' for very young children takes place at night which is why it's so important that BOTH parents get regular overnight contact! Definitely not a good reason to withold contact - more an impetus for it to take place if you ask me....
Just to add I wasn't the other woman they'd been apart 4 years
I'm going through the same thing wicked. I consider myself reasonable and balanced but these situations can bring out the worst in people. IMHO its in everyones best interest that a relationship with the child and their father is pro actively encouraged even by the childs mother irrespective of why their relationship ended. These kids will grow up one day and decide for themselves whether dad made a good decision or not.
Having 2 stable homes...1 at mums 1 at dads is surely an advantage? Absent parents looking after children and taking them somewhere and introducing them to different people is an exercise in parental responsibility. I do not believe it is up to either parent to dictate how their time is spent with the child.(Just to say this is where there are no genuine concerns of abuse.)
I wouldn't meet my OH ex if you paid me lol. I would of at the beginning had she not started this major hate campaign against me and my children for no other reason than I was with her childs father! If preventing her child from having a relationship with me is a good parent then I must be doing something wrong LOL
Mediation is definitely a good start but be prepared to go to court at least then your partner can say he has tried to fight for access. Although to me he shouldn't have to fight to be a father full stop.
I agree with Petal sour grapes is not a valid reason at all.
she even said it had to be in her own time as she needed to come to terms with it
If she's still coming to terms with it how long ago did they split? I'm guessing she still thought they had a chance at working it out until she found out you were living together, which is why she's filing for divorce?
Do you still have his dc for daytime contact and is it possible to re-work the phasing plan to take into account you living there? Or is there no other choice but to go to court?
The ex had agreed to start allowing SD to visit BFs (our) house with a view to eventually allowing stop-overs (she even said it had to be in her own time as she needed to come to terms with it) but since she found out I had been with them on one of his access days she has threatened to stop access altogether and started divorce proceedings. These are not the actions of a parent who cares for their child's emotional wellbeing they are the actions of someone who is hurt and angry and using their child as punishment.
We still don't know if she realises we live together but it will all come out in the mediation process, I just hope it doesn't send her over the edge.
But theres nothing in the original post to indicate that the child is suffering emotional distress. And besides, it would be a very easy/cheap shot on the exs part to insist that the child would be upset by access. I absolutely agree that a positive working relationship between the parents would be a benefit, but where that doesnt exist, why should the father (and his new partner) be the ones to give in all the time? You hear about so many non-resident fathers who go to ridiculous length to avoid rocking the boat just in case the ex withdraws access. My DH would, at one time, have painted himself green and stood on one leg if it kept
Madam the ex happy. Madness.
Could cause unnecessary emotional distress to the child though. I'm not saying there is a right or wrong way to go about gaining more access but surely having a half decent relationship with the childs mother goes a long way?
So what are you suggesting that the OP indulges the exs sensitivities, in the hope that things improve? They could find themselves tip-toeing round the ex forever. As I said in an earlier post, sour grapes is not a valid reason to withhold access.
And even if the ex insists that the child doesnt settle well if shes with her father and his new partner is that a legally substantial reason to deny access? Would a court uphold this? I doubt it.
Wicked - I think they indicate how your bf's ex may see the situation which if you want to empathise with her or help to improve the situation without going to court you could take into account. She may genuinely feel that it isn't in their childs best interests to have overnight visits.
I know ds doesn't settle well if we leave him with relatives (he's 3), could that be why or at least part of the reason why she won't let their child stay with you both?
Nothing what do any of those things have to do with a child's right to see her father? We live together, of course she needs to meet me.
Sadly that seems to the be the attitude she has, and it's so frustrating especially when she cites SDs emotional wellbeing as a reason for being so controlling.
Nothingisasbadasitseems whilst I can completely understand the sentiments behind your list of reasons why you would be reluctant for an ex and his new partner to have the child overnight, I doubt any of them carry any legal weight. As LadyDeedy said, the mother does not have the power to decide if/when the father should have access, nor can she dictate the company he keeps during that access. Sour grapes is not a good enough reason to deny a man access to his children.
Solicitors will indeed write what the client wants. I would put little store by the letter. however, it does seem that legal action is the way ahead. The ex is making the situation all about her, not about the child. Your BF can introduce his daughter to whoever he likes - it is not the mother's decision and she cannot veto it (unless of course there's risk of danger etc). Sounds like she is being very short sighted in this case.
You are doing the right thing in trying to support your BF. Get court action going and then your BF will at least have something reasonable to work to in terms of access (currently far too little it seems, currently).
I still couldn't answer how long it would take for me, if I was in that situation, to let you and the ex have the dc overnight as it would depend on:
- How long ago we split, reasons for the split and are we still friends or at least on speaking terms?
- How long have you been with the ex? If the ex trusts you around our dc and I still trust exs ability to look after dc (again can't really answer unless I know the answers to Q1) then it could be sooner rather than later.
- What you are like with children? If dc came home after spending the day with you and ex and complained about how you treated them I'd have problems letting them stay over if you were around.
I'd also want to talk to ex about how serious his relationship was as I don't believe a string of 'aunts'/'uncles' coming and going from a childs life is healthy.
Petal02 legal proceedings are inevitable now, sadly, although at least there will be a chance for mediation. All her threats are so obviously about her personal feelings of anger and nothing to do with the child's welfare that the mediator should bring her down to earth pretty quickly.
Wickedstepmonster whilst I can totally understand why you want to avoid legal proceedings, it sadly might end up going that way, otherwise the ex will call all the shots.
And regardless of whether or not you were the other woman, your DP has a legal right to see his daughter. One poster has suggested that if you were the other woman then it may be inappropriate for the children to meet you I doubt this stacks up legally. Surely your DP has the right for other people to be present during access, providing they dont present a threat the ex doesnt get the right to choose who the daughter meets during access, heaven forbid. As for the mothers sensitivities being considered I doubt this stacks up legally either, otherwise access would be denied in millions of families.
I like Mumandboys suggestion of sending a solicitors letter, stating that you wish to sort things out, and are happy to do so via mediation. Its not heading directly down the court route, but it does make it clear that any discussions/negotiations will be a structured, organised two-way decision, and not everyone jumping to the exs demands.
solicitors on the whole do as they are told - they work for their clients. They can advise against something but in the end, if the client wants it, the clients wants it.
Tell your DP to join Families Need Fathers. My DH got loads of advice and support from their forum. Xx
Xalla thanks for your post. Since my original post, the exw has started divorce proceedings. BF received a letter specifially stating that she will stop contact if I am involved. I can't believe her solicitor agreed to put that in the letter, it seems brazenly unreasonable.
The solicitor has also suggested mediation so I suppose that is a good sign, hopefully she will have no choice but to compromise, even if it does end up taking a bit longer.
I was in this situation once upon a time. I was never the 'other woman' - DH was never in a serious relationship with my DSD's mother let alone married to her but she still stopped contact when my DH and I started seeing each other.
We've been married for 5 years now and my DH has DSD 50% of the time. It's been a long, tedious journey for him to reach this point. For a long time it was very much a case of Mum saying "jump" and him saying "how high"?
I didn't really have a lot to do with my DSD until after the first 12 months of our relationship. We married about 12 months after that and it wasn't until we were married that my DH got decent contact restablished. I think my DSD's Mum realised at that point there really wasn't much she could do about our relationship.
I didn't and don't empathize with her to be honest; most of her behaviour was driven by her own insecurities / jealousy and had little if anything to do with DSD's wellbeing.
We had our own 'phased plan' - I can't quite remember the details of it but certainly it involved first my DH spending time with DSD at Mum's house, followed by me and DH spending time at Mum's house, followed by DSD coming to us a for a few hours. It quickly escalated to overnights at that point. I did have Mum over to 'inspect' our home once....it was hideous and I don't recommend it!
The sorry fact is that if your DP is currently seeing his DD for only a few hours each week (far too little for a 4 year old to be seeing her Dad btw), he's not in a very strong position. If he goes down the court route, contact will most likely improve but it will be a long, slow and expensive process and he'll have to jump through all kinds of hoops. Imo he may as well try jumping through HER hoops for a while and see where it gets him.
You probably are going to have to take a back seat for a while but at the same time I think your DP should put a clear time limit on when you do start playing a part in his DD's life. Some posters higher up have suggested 6 months...that seems reasonable. He should insist his ex is clear that you're eventual involvement is inevitable and non-negotiable.
I know it's really hard when you love someone and you want to share their world but this is one of those things you just can't push too quickly. Patience is a virtue and all that. Good luck.
had to laugh at the 'empathy' thing...the woman my ex left me for once told me she had a lot of 'empathy' for me. Hilarious, really, when you think about how involved she was in lying and cheating and hiding and telling stories. There was - and never was - any empathy and if you have been involved in the breakdown of this woman's marriage, please don't pretend you either know or care how she's feeling.
I am assuming (my apologies if I'm assuming wrongly) that you are the 'other woman' in which case, things will always be difficult. That's not the children's fault, however, and there is a need to balance mum's sensitivities with the on-going rights of the children to a relationship with their father. Mediation is a good starting point if she will consider it - it would probably be worth sending an 'official' letter (from a solicitor) stating that you wish to sort things out 'for the sake of the children' and are happy to do so via mediation so that everyone's opinions get taken into account. However, in the same letter, you need to time limit her - give her 2 weeks to agree to mediation or say you will start court proceedings for a contact order. If she hasn't agreed to mediation at the end of the 2 weeks, proceed directly to court. There is a lot of information on the Families Need Fathers website about self-repping, it doesn't need to cost a fortune.
Within all of this, you do need to be aware of timescales and appropriateness - if you are the 'other woman' (sorry, I know that's a horrible title) and the relationship breakdown is recent (less than 6 months ago, maybe even up to a year), it may be considered inappropriate to have the children meet you. Any new partner shouldn't really expect an introduction prior to the 6 month mark and some kind of plan should be in place to make sure that the introduction is child-focused. You will need this info for court.
There is no need for 'vetting'. A parent is allowed to introduce their children to whoever they consider appropriate. I can't think of anything worse than meeting my ex's new partner and trying to be polite to her about life, the universe any anything. Would rather stick pins in my eyes. I have little respect for my ex, but I do know he loves our children and will do his best for him within his own definition of 'best'. There is no need for introductions or pretend friendliness. I certainly wouldn't take kindly to the 'other woman' sending me books on 'now mummy and daddy don't live together'. I am capable of parenting my own children, thanks!
I think there are two things that you need to be thinking about
1 - She cannot stop access. She can make things diffcult temporarily but I believe the courts don't look highly on this and it is highly unlikely they will decide that LO should not see her father. They will decide what is in the best interests of the child and, unless there is a risk of abuse etc, that would be to have regular contact with her dad. If things do get that far and she then messes about with access that would be breaching the court's order and things can be taken further. Hopefully it won't get that far though!
2 - By being open and honest and letting her know the full and true facts of the situation you/BF are in the 'right'. If she reacts badly then she is in the wrong but you have done all you can to be have handled the situation correctly. You never know, she might just appreciate the effort given a little time!
If you hide things/are not honest (or if comes accross like that to her) then I'm sorry but IMO that makes you/BF in the wrong and she can use that as an excuse to not behave correctly herself - i.e. threatening resticted access.
At then end of the day I think you are right when you say you guess it will just take time and patience. Hopefully she will come round and realise that going down the "offical" route is not in the best interest of her DD and will be able to come to some agreement with your BF and acceptance of you.
I agree it doesn't matter if OW or not - just trying to understand reasoning behind Ex's behaviour (not that there is a reasoning for manipulating and using kids as a weapon).
We have faced issues with contact and then overnight visits. Many, many years on this is no longer an issue and have EW access
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.