Mary Seacole being removed from National Curriculum

(11 Posts)
sheloveshistory Mon 21-Jan-13 00:04:06

I am shocked and disgusted at proposals to remove Mary Seacole from the National Curriculum.

After being forgotten about for many years, why would we want her memory to fade yet again.

Please sign the petition www.raceequalityfoundation.org.uk/news/michael-gove-secretary-state-education-keep-mary-seacole-national-curriculum
Lets keep this national heroine where she belongs, as part of history.

Sonatensatz Mon 21-Jan-13 16:43:28

They study her in my DC's infant school alongside Florence Nightingale they cover them both equally. My Ds's really enjoyed finding out about her. I expect DD will be finding out about her later on this year.

drjohnsonscat Mon 21-Jan-13 14:35:28

yeah Florence Nightingale, what a bitch confused

bobthebuddha Mon 21-Jan-13 14:33:26

"IMO, it is disgraceful the way Ms Seacole is overshadowed by the egotistical and narcissistic Nightingale character."

What an extraordinary statement; is Nightingale attempting to maliciously overshadow Seacole from beyond the grave?

As for 'egotistical and narcissistic', it's been hard enough for women to make their way professionally in the 20th century never mind in the 19th, against fierce opposition from family and a prevalent view of nurses as women of ill-repute. Perhaps you'd like to fling some more of the insults women still receive in male-dominated professions? Hysterical perhaps?

There's room for both to be remembered without trying to trash either one.

sheloveshistory Mon 21-Jan-13 06:56:08

Mary Seacole is in the appendix of the primary curriculum, alongside Florence Nightingale and others, and the study of her is not mandatory.

Although removal will not prevent schools from covering her during the Victorian history, my fear is she will fade away once again.

scaevola Mon 21-Jan-13 06:54:04

OP: could you specify which National Curriculum you mean?

Here is the England/Wales history NC for secondary schools where she is not mentioned at all, and here is the primary one, where the whole period (Victorians) is already optional, and she is mentioned (along with others like Mary Kingsley) as an example, not a compulsory component.

Littlefish Mon 21-Jan-13 06:40:55

It's up to schools which historical figures they choose to study.

No.

ClayDavis Mon 21-Jan-13 04:55:44

Mary Seacole isn't in the current National Curriculum is she?

FiaGrace Mon 21-Jan-13 01:06:15

I hadn't heard about this but have happily signed the petition. It's disgusting.

ripsishere Mon 21-Jan-13 01:02:09

I signed that a couple of days ago.
IMO, it is disgraceful the way Ms Seacole is overshadowed by the egotistical and narcissistic Nightingale character.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now