Not confident that my children are getting a good education!(37 Posts)
We received a letter from school this week stating that our year 3 teacher had gone on long-term sick! The school have decided not to get a supply teacher but to mix teachers around so year 2 teacher will teach year 2 in the morning and year 3 in the afternoon, year 6 teacher will teach year 6 in the morning and year 2 in the afternoon, the deputy head will teach year 3 in the morning!
I am concerned about the possibility of having the kind of cohesive approach that primary children need when two teachers are swapping over. I feel that a primary class needs one teacher who can get to know the children properly and create a stable environment! I don?t believe that it will be easier for one teacher to personally know 60 children better than they can get to know 30!
Also the school lacks on communication. We have one parents meeting at the end of the year! I understand from a few other schools that at least four target performance meetings take place between parents and teachers each year. We are not informed of the childrens grades. The children do bring home reading books but we don't get any more homework than this.
I emailed the headteacher about my concerns and she sent back an email that I think is very intimidating (see below).
'Please will you contact the admin office to make an appointment that suits us both. I will invite my senior management team, my Learning Mentor Manager and the Chair of Governors to attend the meeting'.
I hate to sound negative all the time but nothing is more important to me than my three children. I want the best for them and the best education I can get for them. I was so excited thinking about my children starting school, assisting in their learning (doing homework) I never guessed it would be this difficult!
Hi JJWMummy so nice to hear from someone facing similar problems. Has a working mum with three young children I certainly don't want to take these issues on but I will never sit back and say nothing I feel these people are not providing a good education. I glad you're happy with the teacher this year!
Not had time to read whole post so if I repeat anything I apologise.
Main reason for not getting in a supply teacher I'm afraid will be cost, yes they have insurance, but they won't want to use it. The mix up of teachers is most definitely detrimental to education, completely inconsistent, will only serve to confuse the kids.
DH is also a Governer and has found it very difficult to question HT, she is very forthright and been in the position 14yrs, my DH only having been a govn for one yr feels unable at the point to be questioning of her.
Our school is also rubbish at communication and I have had to be very in your face about finding things out, constantly n class changing books myself and asking for assessments to be done. That said we have (so far) a better teacher this yr, DS2 is in yr1 and teacher an NQT, was worried initially but he seems to be thriving and coming on in leaps and bounds.
As regards your DD being sent to the nursery with receptionist, OMG! She is entitled to an age appropriate education and they are not providing it.
Yes a meeting with HT is first port of call, then govn, then LEA.
Don't settle for this, they are out of order and HT knows it, hence the amt of people she wants on her side at the meeting.
Thanks for your advise. You seem to get a lot of possitives from being a school governor. I'll pass it on to DH. I'm feeling more positive about my meeting also. I guess I'll go talk to them findout the situation and take it from there. Much better option than selling up and moving schools ! From the feed back it sounds very much like all schools experience similar things!
I would recommend he has a chat with the chair. And does the training (if for no other reason than it is really useful to chat with governors from other local schools so that he can get a feel for whether his GB is typical).
Obviously governors need to be sensitive to the staff governors present, and we should NEVER comment about issues to do with individual staff members at meetings. Also we need to be very careful not to tell the professionals how to do their job. It is not for us to say how often a book should be changed.
BUT... if there are recurring issues in the school that governors suspect are having an impact on pupil progress then these should be discussed. Or if there are recurring negative themes in parents' feedback about the school then these should be discussed. So I'd not expect to discuss details like book swapping, but I would expect to discuss more general issues to do with how to involve parents in their children's education, setting up parent forums etc.
I woud also expect governors to be given detailed summaries of pupil progress so that if there is a dip in progress in particular year groups then they would know this and be able to quiz the HT as to why this might be. So this time next year he should know what the impact of this staffing decision has been. Ultimately the governors need to be given all the information that they need to know whether all is well at the school. And if all is not well, then they should know exactly what is being done to improve the situation.
Do the governors do school visits? That is another way of them finding out more about what is going on.
He's not done the training yet but it has been mentioned! After the first three meetings he was wondering if it's a good use of his time. (Topics discussed seemed to be all about staff salary's). It has also been said to DH by HT not to bring up conversations about certain issues e.g books not being swopped enough, communication not being great, anything that might offend a teacher! From your experience as a school governor would you recomend him to stick it out?
@OP - If you hear hooves over the horizon of some English field I think 'horse' rather than 'zebra'.
If I asked to see my HM about staffing issues that I felt was impacting my DCs education and the HM arranged a meeting with key people I would think that I was being treated seriously. I certainly wouldn't suspect the HM of trying to intimidate me.
Anyway, that is just me.
I agree that there are important issues here and it appears to me that the HM is trying to address your concerns. I hope that it goes well.
Has your DH done the induction training yet?
I actually found it really helpful in clarifying our role.
Year 6 are being taught by a teacher who normally works will each year teaching writing skills.
Thanks SarkyWench. DH is new to being a school governor and still figuring it out! I know HT had to make a quick decision! However, when this question was asked by DH her reponse was 'please be aware that staffing issues such as these, do not have to go to governors for approval/consultation' maybe a better response would have been to inform DH that the decisions made will be dicussed at the next meeting?
I didn't think of the possibility that she has asked for the meeting to include all the schools key figures as a way to getting a better solution! I guess due to the fact that some of her first response to me was on the defensive that I also jumped on the defensive side. Thanks SarkyWench I will keep an open mind
They certainly shoiuld have insurance.
My guess is that they are making up for a hole in their budget caused by something else. Was the DH previoulsy not in the classroom? Maybe that was unsustainable?
btw who is teaching year 6 in the afternoon? It sounds like they are still short of half a teacher.
I have been told they do have insurance in place for this type of thing! Maybe the reason is about finding decent supply staff (not sure how hard this is to do)?
I know they are cutting back on TA's! However, adults seem to be very thin on the ground lately hence, my DD in yr1 having to send time playing in nursery whilst the receptionist watch them
She is correct that governors don't get to tell the HT how to organise her staff, but the governors should definnitely be kept informed of any issues that could impact on pupil progress (including staffing issues). At the very least she shold be required to explain to them why she has decided that this is the best option. The governors should be told whether this decision is primarily based on finances, availability of good supply staff, or something else.
Do they have a personnel committee? I would expect it to be discussed there.
I would also expect it to be covered in the head teachers report to the Governing Body, which would give all governors the chance to ask questions.
I would suggest that your DH has a word with the chair.
I am a governor and I would most certainly expect to know why this decision had been taken (although there is often a time lag due to timing of meetings).
It sounds like that (for whatever reason) they are in a tricky spot and are doing the best that they can in non-ideal circumstances.
Also, while it is clearly possible that the HT was trying to 'bully' you into keeping quiet, it is also possible that she is unhappy with the situation and is using your complaint as a way of pushing for a better solution. Remember that she may not have the financial resources to fix this problem in the way that she would like.
And finally, I agree that one parents evening at the end of the year is inadequate.
Sounds like a bit of a mess! Hope the meeting goes well
The ideal would be to find a supply to cover for the time the teacher is off sick. But
1) You have to find a supply teacher who will do it.
2) You have to find a decent supply teacher who will do it <tumble weed>
3) The school may not have the funds to employ a supply teacher (times is hard for schools at the moment!)
This is the first thread Ive posted on Mumsnet so thank you all for your comments and advice.
I did do research on effects of teachers doing job share and there were some positive comments. However these were usually I as Tiggytape pointed out different in the sense that all their planning and focus is still on just one year group and one set of children. My DDs teacher will have to do the lesson plan for both year 2 & 3!
AMPF I am very much not a fluffy mother but found the head teachers reply to be over the top to my email. I emailed a few concerns that I wished to discuss and feel that she has over reacted! Also I really dont think you can compare your working situation to this situation. They are two majorly different sectors! I personally do not agree with having one parents meeting at the end of the school year! How can you help your children at the end of a year if you find out they havent done so well in their SATS. I have several friends who are teachers in other school who do give homework and do have more parents meetings.
At the end of the day I do not send my children to school to be babysat. I send them to school to be educated! Research shows that children do better in school when teachers talk often with parents and become involved in the school.
SarkyWench DH is still a governor but was told that governors do not have to be consulted on any staffing issues!
Blu maybe it is a financial issue. Its defiantly a question to ask. Thanks!
iseenodust thanks for your support. I agree, both myself and DH felt that the response could have been more open. We run an IT support company and DH has offered to give the school any free help they may require with their IT. We are trying to help the school anyway we can. Maybe her response to things is the reason the staff turnover in the school is so high?
DH is attending the meeting with me along with several other mums & dads (who do care a lot) so we will just have to wait and see!
I agree that one doesn't need an audience to validate oneself. At the same time, an audience is not necessarily a tool of a HM intent on intimidating a parent.
If you are right then the HM must think that the OP is a Fluffy Mummy and that she can be intimidated by 3 middle aged white dudes
Basically, I don't try to draw conclusions based on how many people are in the room with me.
APMF not everyone needs an audience of many to validate themselves. I think the HT is taking OP seriously. But, it's manifesting itself in a defensive way. A more open response would have been 'I appreciate your concerns. I am available on x or y, or if these do not work for you please make an appointment at your convenience through the school sec.'
Is it possible that she is insisting that the Chair oGovernors come to the meeting because it is the governors putting the brakes on the money to employ a f/t replacement teacher? And she wnats them to hear what a parent has to say?
I would say your request is being taken seriously, rather than an attempt to intimidate you. Take another parent if anyone else feels the same as you.
I recently raised a concern with a company we were doing business with. The sales exec arranged a meeting with himself, the account manager and the sales director. I should have realised that they were trying to intimidate me.
Sorry for being so mocking. It's just to me this is a sign that I am being taken seriously and the fact that the OP's 'support group' thinks the HM is trying to intimidate the OP is a reflection on how you choose to see the world around you.
And there may be compelling financial reasons for this decision depending on the schools arrangements for covering sick pay.
Is your DH still a governor?
I would expect the governing body to take time to discuss major changes to the staffing arrangements like this. They are responsible for ensuring that the head is making adequate arrangements.
APMF your fluffy mummy comment is bonkers. OP emailed the HT to raise concerns. The answer was I'll meet you with at least two sitting either side of me (deputy HT, mentor, Chair, prob KS2/KS1 head). I'll bet OP would be offered a little lower chair too.
We only got one parent evenings a year at our primary. As far as I know, this is the norm around here. IMO this is reasonable unless for some reason you need to monitor your DCs progress throughout the year. In which case, just have a quick word with the teacher at pick up time.
At our school 'homework' consisted of reading and spellings. I thought there should be more but I was in the minority among the parents. Sounds like your other parents feel the same way.
Anyway, I am not in your shoes so I can only fill in the blanks based on my personnal experience. I'm just saying that if I had highlighted this issues with my HM I would consider it as a good sign that these other people would be there. As for being intimidated, you must be quite a fluffy mummy to even consider that as a motive.
She is trying to intimidate you yes.
I agree with iseenodust.
Graciously accept and get out and spread the word to the parents, she's opened herself up to a meeting. Parent power will be your best hope.
I'm not sure that's true APMF - the OP e-mailed the Head only.
confrontational? intimidateding? Jeeze the school just can't win. If the meeting was with just the HM there would be the eye rolling and accusations that the school wasn't taking it seriously.
Join the discussion
Please login first.