ZOMBIE THREAD ALERT: This thread hasn't been posted on for a while.
what age did you let DD start reading Jacqueline Wilson ?(39 Posts)
I am torn really - my DD has really come on leaps on bounds with her reading ( at the start of y1 she had trouble reading key words like, they, went etc) she has just started Y3 but towards the end of Y2 started reading independently by choice she loves reading so much now. Because her Nan quite innocently got her the Jacqueline Wilson magazine she became interested in her books - she knows her idol - her 17 year old cousin used to read them when she was younger - I must admit I even convinced myself I'd bought her some JW books at DD age!! I did not realise how advanced some of the content is - talking about sex (not literally but in passing) etc until she just read a chapter to me.
Part of me wants to run and get her some nice innocent Enid Blyton or CS Lewis or Rainbow Fairies or something - she is a young and innocent 7yr old - July born.
But the other part of me remembers how enchanted I was with books at her age and how I learn't so much about the world reading books I probably shouldn't of Judy Blume anyone lol). I should be honest with her when she asks about these issues shouldn't I ?- surely it can't do her too much harm I mean JW is quite sensible in her approaches to sensitive subjects.
So if you have a DD what age did you let her start reading JW books and what age would consider an appropriate age to let them read?
She is currently Candyfloss - a hand me down from her cousin.
JW writes for a huge age range - some of her books are fine for 5/6/7 year olds, some are definitely more teenage - I am afraid you need to vet them one by one. Read the backs, flick through the pages, check amazon reviews etc.
DD is 8 and went through a big JW phase last year, but I kept her away from the ones with more teenage content.
I think that's the mistake I made - not realising the range she writes for although thinking back I had managed to hide "girls in love" when she got given it.
sloping off to Amazon now to check reviews for Candyfloss - hadn't thought about that - may have to stop the magazine buying - its ruddy expensive anyway.
Dd2 has been reasing them for the last year. She's just gone into year 3. HAve also removed the girls in love series, unfortunately half way through reading...
DD read Candyfloss and Cookie when she was 6, nearly 7, found them fine, no difficult questions asked!
She is giving them a rest for a while at the mo as she is ploughing through Harry Potter but has said that she wants to read The Longest Whale Song after HP no.7. MIL BTW thinks that delicate little girls shouldn't be reading books about, shock horror, real life and issues that affect people, but she is stuck in the 1950's and thinks they should be knitting and sewing instead.
newterm, I have found that grandparents get increasingly protective with age
my mother is definitely of the opinion that her grandchildren - or at least my youngest brother's children- should stick to the sweet and fluffy: I have no recollection of her raising the slightest eyebrow at my reading Treasure Island or Captain Marryatt at the same age. Some of those old classics are far gorier than anything JK Rowling has ever imagined.
I think it is an increasing sense of vulnerability as they feel themselves becoming more vulnerable. It has been interesting to see the progression of this from eldest to youngest grandchild- definitely more to do with something in herself.
Interesting, Cory. MIL is hard to sum up in a few words, but think nervous, bigoted and feeble. She is quite a controlling person in subtle ways - DH doesn't admit to noticing - but me and SIL do. I think she would feel far more comfortable if DD wasn't such a competent reader and was still into Fairy books etc - because that is what SHE would have read at her age IYKWIM.
My dd has been JW mad since she was 6. I vetted the books and she has really enjoyed reading them over the years. Dd is 10 now and I've decided to cut the apron strings and let her read whichever ones she wants. She's currently reading Hetty Feather and my 11yo son is engrossed in dds Cookies cast off.
I read JW and DD got two last year for Christmas. I read them both, and let her read Hetty Feather but not the other one (I think it was Jodie something or other). She turned 9 in August.
I was torn because it's taken me all her life to get DHs family to buy her books and his nieces daughter (older than DD) loves JW
apparently, I am inclined to be judgey and think the ony books she possesses are the ones I've bought her over the years which are all suspiciously pristine and never move so that was what they bought.
I quite like them, but of course I'm a grown up, and I often feel that JW writes what she thinks parents think children will want to read, and she is very "right on" and "socially suitable" just now, but her books are so bloody depressing - even the so called happy endings are miserable a lot of the time. They're just not what I want DD to read yet so I either outright say No or tell her an outline of the plot and so far she hasn't wanted to read them.
The books are written in 4 age categories www.jacquelinewilson.co.uk/the-books/ (on the left). It's irritating that these aren't actually indicated in the books though.
DD1 was close to 7 when she started reading proper JW books not the very young ones, tbh I have never 'vetted' them or 'let her' read them, she reads what she fancies and talks about all sorts of stuff as a result.
She has come across one from the library recently (she is 8 now) that involved a teen making themselves sick...she told me she didn't like it and she herself suggested she should probably stop reading it, and did!
DD started reading the 'younger' ones when she was 6, and met JW at a book signing just before she was 7. JW was absolutely lovely, even though the signing had over-run by a couple of hours and actually asked how old DD was (she was,and still is, v petite, so prob looked about 4!).
That was nearly 10 years ago, so there were fewer of her books around, and therefore easier to be clear on content.
DD was also partial to a bit of Blyton, Narnia etc - I don't think they are necessarily mutually exclusive!
Which one was that heymammy? The only one that has caused disquiet here is Dustbin Baby, which unsurprisingly is on the 12+ list and wasn't suitable for my (then) 8 year olds. Hetty Feather caused tears last week as well. I had never thought to censor children's books before JW came into our lives.
Re 'censoring' - my mother restricting our viewing very severely, while being proud of my literacy. I found some of the children's classics traumatising - I struggle to think of a hero/heroine who wasn't orphaned/abused/paralysed in some terrible accident - some all at the same time
Oh the irony of her forbidding me to see that notoriously immoral film 'Grease' while I was reading 'Lace' and 'The Thorn Birds' along with all my friends at convent school
At least we are being selective on the grounds of what we see for ourselves, and what our individual children can cope with, rather than on received 'wisdom'.
Sorry - should read 'restricted' not restricting - why do I always end up with egg on my face when I'm being caustic
Irony indeed My son just read Pollyanna and I asked him if it was a happy book, as I thought it was, and apparently Pollyanna ends up in a wheelchair!
Ah yes - the omnipresent wheelchair: What Katy Did, The Secret Garden and Heidi also featured some poor child confined to one as a plot device - and that's off the top of my head! And don't get me started on young deaths from TB - Little Women and Anne of Avonlea spring immediately
What age for the Anne books for? I really want my children to read them, and also love them so don't want to give too early. I can't remember what age I was.
*age I was when I first read them.
I think the Anne books are the least traumatic of all this genre so, depending on the child, I would have thought around 10. She is an orphan, but that's just the device to get her to Avonlea - no wallowing in misery.
The language is pretty dated, but not too turgid and the scrapes she gets herself into are quite amusing,
I am biased as she is that rare childhood heroine - a fellow redhead, so I sympathised with her freckle trauma
Thank you. The original Just William series was hit here so the dated language is fine. I wonder if I re-read them now if I would relate to Marilla or Anne? I'll dig them out this weekend.
Just William are fab as were Jennings and Darbyshire - if you remember them?
Scary thought re Marilla! I think that the fact you could 'grow up' with Anne as she became a teacher, married etc was part of the charm for me.
Anne of Green gables is relatively untraumatic, but lovely Matthew dies at the end. My DD loves me to read classic books to her (while she devours age-apt JW) - there's very few of them I could get through without totally tearing up at points. Some of the later books in the Anne series are I think best kept till a bit later (we finished them up last year, DD is 12 now) - Anne loses a baby in one, various other deaths, then there's the rather odd plotline with her friend Leslie... and the last book, Rilla of Ingleside is set during WWI, I was actually very interested in some of the history but I wouldn't have wanted to read it to DD much younger.
You're right Grimma, that's what I meant by 'growing up' with Anne. Was reading the later ones for the first time as a sixth-former
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.