Hi all,
I'm having a bit of a palaver over my birth plan. I've relocated into a different PCT (marriage breakdown means I've had to move in with parents with my toddler) and here, no-body knows me. I was booked in with a specialist birth trauma midwife where I lived previously, who supported an ELCS due to my previous emergency delivery, my problems in pregnancy (SPD very severe) and general stress over the situation.
It was meant to be discussed and booked in here, but the consultant is pushing me to have a 'natural' delivery. She's suggesting I use stong opiate painkillers at a level that my baby would require withdrawal management from, to control my SPD. She says going through withdrawal is better for my baby than having a planned section. I disagree. I would rather grit my teeth through the pain, even though I'll be very, very tired, and have a planned section. I don't understand why the doctors are pushing me to have a 'natural' delivery when it means lots of drugs, total exhaustion and the likelihood that I'll need another instrumental delivery if I am too tired to get baby out. Last time I had emergency forceps in theatre, and took 10 months to recover from my pelvic problems :(
The main argument seems to be that a c-section takes 6 weeks to recover from. I don't really give a damn when I know that my last delivery/pregnancy took roughly the best part of a year to recover from. And I DO NOT WANT to take high doses of morphine for the next 18 weeks or so just to 'perform' as a woman :(
How do I get them to listen to me? Am I being unreasonable about this? Can someone more experienced come along and tell me why the doctors plan is better than mine? Feel very upset and pressured about the whole thing.