No mention of Lilibet on Royal Family website

[NaryFairy]

The royal family's website - Royal.uk - says that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have one child , Archie. I find this extraordinary. You'd think they have the staff to update a website. Are there any informed royal watchers out there who could explain this? Does a new addition to the family need to be introduced to the Queen before he/she is acknowledged?

[StormzyinaTCup]

@MrsFin

I wonder who the woman outside the window is?

🤣🤣

It reminds me of what I did with my dog when I had an important work zoom call, I put him out in the garden. He would also stand by the back door looking through the glass waiting for me to let him back in 😁

[MrsFin]

Oops!

[Roundlampshade]

That isn’t a woman, that’s Harry

[MrsFin]

I wonder who the woman outside the window is?

[Coronateachingagain]

@CallmeHendricks

It isn't a monogrammed chair, it's a Hermes blanket/ throw (retailing at around £1200).

To think his Daddy cut him off his finances, they should be spending more sensibly, but I guess a couple of thousand pounds does not move the needle much.

[CallmeHendricks]

It isn't a monogrammed chair, it's a Hermes blanket/ throw (retailing at around £1200).

[Roundlampshade]

Completely off thread but I took a screen shot of this video to see if I could zoom in on Harry juggling and look, he has a monogrammed chair. Do you think Meghan’s has M, Archie has A and Lili has L. Do you think they swap the chairs around to make words? I would.

[Gilmorehill]

ITV did have a spitting image type puppet show and it did do a puppet of Prince George. Any satire or comedy about children is completely unacceptable.

[upinaballoon]

@Eaumyword

It stands for Home Box Office and is an American channel, tends to show made for TV movies. It does also carry big (in it's day) TV shows like Sex and the City etc.

Thank you.

[Eaumyword]

It stands for Home Box Office and is an American channel, tends to show made for TV movies. It does also carry big (in it's day) TV shows like Sex and the City etc.

[upinaballoon]

Please, what is HBO?

[LaMarschallin]

@ohforarainyday

I think Rousette is definitely the poster with the most invested in all H&M threads.

I'm sure I've seen Mummy195 (or 194?) crop up even more than Roussette when I have a catch-up on these threads.

Comments like this are vile and are bullying. (And I've been the target of many as well.)

It's not Rousette or me or Mummy who have started literally tens of hundreds of Meghan-bashing threads. That was all Meghan haters.

None of us have ever been caught sockpuppeting within one thread to make it look like more people share our opinions than actually do, only Meghan bashers have been caught doing that.


None of us have ever been banned and registered a new account under a new email address because we were so desperate to continue telling Mumsnetters our opinions on Meghan, yet numerous Meghan bashers and Meghan bash threads have been deleted with the "previously banned poster" message from MNHQ, and one Meghan basher proudly admits that they've had to create more than a dozen different email accounts because they've been banned from Mumsnet so many times. I honestly can't imagine being that fixated I'd be willing to go to such extreme lengths just to be able to keep sharing my hatred of some random celeb!

None of us have ever started up an entire alternate forum as a place to say things about Meghan that MNHQ won't allow.

None of us have ever been caught discussing the best "tactics" to get posters with a different opinion on Meghan deleted or banned. Meghan bashers have.

None of us have ever harassed or doxxed people with a different opinion on Meghan, the only ones who have done that are Meghan haters.

But by all means, continue this gaslighting campaign of trying to paint anyone who doesn't hate Meghan as obsessive. The fact some of the posters seem determined to take any opportunity to derail the conversation away from Meghan and onto personal discussion of non-haters just makes you look like obsessive bullies who have no valid arguments to make about Meghan so have to resort to personal attacks on other posters.

That's a bit unfair.

You've inaccurately quoted me.
My comment wasn't meant to be "vile" or bullying; I just thought Roussette hadn't posted the most on these threads and gave an example of someone who, IMO, has.

I, too, have never done any of those things in your long post.

I would ask what "gaslighting campaign" I've got going?
I hardly ever post.

[Roussette]

Yes, absolutely.

[SueSaid]

Ah I see sorry I should read posts properly.

I hope it gets widely condemned and pulled then and honestly I would say exactly the same if it was targeting the Sussex's dc.

[Viviennemary]

I think its wrong to target children . Im sure Spitting Image never did that. Anyway curiousity got the better of me and I did watch the trailer. Its really stupid and not funny and poorly done. It will die a death. Its ridiculous.

[CauliflowerCheese30]

I'm not even going to watch the trailer

[Roussette]

Sorry, not explaining myself well. It's running

[Roussette]

No no no.

They 'stealth dropped' it onto the channel. No fanfare. No publicity to speak of. They just knew it was wrong I think, but still carried on.

Biggest insult for them has been 'it's just no funny'.

[SueSaid]

@Roussette

Janiie I saw about this on twitter.

Horrible. No child should be targeted in this way ever. It is said HBO stealth dropped it because they just knew it was near to the mark. Quite rightly they are getting quite a pasting for it.

Oh right it's been dropped? I thought it was about to run. That's a relief. I mean what was Bloom thinking taking part.

It's all just so toxic and horrible isn't it.

[CauliflowerCheese30]

Quite right Roussette, it's disgusting, and shame on those that have taken part, I wonder how they would feel if it were their kids it was based on.

[Roussette]

Janiie I saw about this on twitter.

Horrible. No child should be targeted in this way ever. It is said HBO stealth dropped it because they just knew it was near to the mark. Quite rightly they are getting quite a pasting for it.

[CauliflowerCheese30]

Orlando bloom is the voice over of Harry apparently.

[Angrycat2768]

That is a bit mean. The Windsors left the kids out of it.

[SueSaid]

Sorry to derail I should perhaps have started another thread but has anyone seen the clip of a new programme on HBO called The Prince? An utterly mocking pisstake of Prince George, just seems so crass why would they do something targeting a small child. I think Orlando bloom is one of the voice-overs .

I know we've had Spitting Image and the Windsors but this seems a step too far.

[SetPhasersTaeMalkie]

@ohforarainyday

I think Rousette is definitely the poster with the most invested in all H&M threads.

I'm sure I've seen Mummy195 (or 194?) crop up even more than Roussette when I have a catch-up on these threads.

Comments like this are vile and are bullying. (And I've been the target of many as well.)

It's not Rousette or me or Mummy who have started literally tens of hundreds of Meghan-bashing threads. That was all Meghan haters.

None of us have ever been caught sockpuppeting within one thread to make it look like more people share our opinions than actually do, only Meghan bashers have been caught doing that.


None of us have ever been banned and registered a new account under a new email address because we were so desperate to continue telling Mumsnetters our opinions on Meghan, yet numerous Meghan bashers and Meghan bash threads have been deleted with the "previously banned poster" message from MNHQ, and one Meghan basher proudly admits that they've had to create more than a dozen different email accounts because they've been banned from Mumsnet so many times. I honestly can't imagine being that fixated I'd be willing to go to such extreme lengths just to be able to keep sharing my hatred of some random celeb!

None of us have ever started up an entire alternate forum as a place to say things about Meghan that MNHQ won't allow.

None of us have ever been caught discussing the best "tactics" to get posters with a different opinion on Meghan deleted or banned. Meghan bashers have.

None of us have ever harassed or doxxed people with a different opinion on Meghan, the only ones who have done that are Meghan haters.

But by all means, continue this gaslighting campaign of trying to paint anyone who doesn't hate Meghan as obsessive. The fact some of the posters seem determined to take any opportunity to derail the conversation away from Meghan and onto personal discussion of non-haters just makes you look like obsessive bullies who have no valid arguments to make about Meghan so have to resort to personal attacks on other posters.

Well said.