Something about the portrayal of these two situations really irritated me but I can't articulate it. Over to the wise mumsnetters for help.
Situation 1: young man travels to kabul for the excitement of living on the edge despite essential travel warnings. He then has to be evacuated and it is a happy ending story. To me this grossly overlooked the fact he spent tax payers money to get his adrenaline kick...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-58244518
Situation 2: woman promoted book by dressing up in burka in the name of diversity. she is virtue signalling at the wrong time in history. She is duly called out and torn to shreds.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-58245304
Thing is though, of the two of them, it really does seem like she made the honest mistake but she's treated much worse than the bloke who had disregard for his own safety, the safety of those who then had to rescue him and the funds needed to get him out of the pickle he put himself into for fun...
Is this a BBC thing? Media in general? Am I reading too much into this? It's niggling at me... I think she's being treated unfairly in the press and he's got off scott free and the only reason for that was their sex. I think if the sexes had been reversed, she would still be told off (for putting herself in danger) and he would be treated like a smart alec comedian...
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: chat
Kabul vs the burka: a tale of two Ronnies?
8 replies
Plimsouls · 17/08/2021 17:21
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.