i had to call in sick last week because my childcare flaked. boss said i ruined her weekend away and wants a meeting. i have a 0 hour contract and she’s taken me off the shifts i was meant to be on this week. have a feeling if she’s taking me off the rota that she’s going to axe me. not sure what i was meant to do though? leave my 1 year old at home on her own?
im also 25 weeks pregnant and now worried about smp, will i still qualify if i can push it to 26 weeks?
probably outing but i don’t care. fed up of everyone praising working mums then giving them no leeway when they’re stuck for childcare. what is the point i feel like i might as well be a stay at home mum until kids are in school
AIBU?
can i be fired for this?
bishbashboosh1 · 04/10/2022 21:45
Sux2buthen · 05/10/2022 18:38
People suggest this as if it had never occurred to anyone 🙄
Quite obviously not
ThatGirlInACountrySong · 05/10/2022 08:52
Couldn't dad have taken the time off?
girlmom21 · 05/10/2022 18:48
@Catfordthefifth I'm telling the OP why her manager is pissed off. Everyone's shouting parental leave and we all know about that.
There's no harm in the OP texting her parents the night before and checking they're still ok for childcare if she's relying on them.
girlmom21 · 05/10/2022 18:40
She's not pissed off you needed to have the day off. She's pissed off that you told her right before the start of your shift and gave her no time to find cover for a situation that was avoidable.
How many shifts have you declined or cancelled?
starlightmagic · 05/10/2022 13:46
Those saying emergency parental leave, this is not supposed to be for you to take the day off it’s supposed to be for you find alternate childcare arrangements.
ThatGirlInACountrySong · 05/10/2022 08:52
Couldn't dad have taken the time off?
lannistunut · 04/10/2022 21:49
Yes, you could be sacked for any reason if you haven't been there for two years.
Did you say you were unwell? Is there any way your manager can know you were lying?
It is very difficult for working parents to juggle, but that is the reality.
Brefugee · 05/10/2022 15:58
The fact is that more workers on zero-hour contracts are happy with the arrangement than are those on fixed-hours contracts.
do you have good solid research to back that statement up? I'd like to read it, if so.
TheGoodFighter · 05/10/2022 14:20
I stand corrected, I didn't realise quite how awful things were in the UK. Such a thing would be illegal in my country, like zero hours contracts are.
The UK is a horrific place for workers rights, and continues to get worse.
TheGoodFighter · 05/10/2022 13:22
They are still an employee. "worker" doesn't mean anything at all. She's an employee.
Quveas · 05/10/2022 12:19
I think that some people are getting very confused here. OP is on a zero hours contract. They are a worker and not an employee. Therefore the employer doesn't need to offer any hours at all, and doesn't have to provide any explanation for the lack of hours. So we can all agree that the employer is s**t, we can all agree that zero hours contracts should be made illegal, and we can all agree that employers ought to realise that people have lives and other priorities. But in this case the employer appears to consider turning up to the allocated shifts to be their only priority and as the law stands they are allowed to think that. There is a difference between what we might wish the law says and what it actually says.
So on the basis that the employer appears to have already withdrawn shifts and the OP needs the pay, I think that however much it might stick in the craw, humble pie and an apology would be the best strategy. I'm all for fighting if you have some cards to play - there doesn't seem to be a good hand here for the OP, so instead of fantasising about reading them a riot act and threatening them with legal cases that you know you aren't going to fight, it's probably better to say sorry and it won't happen again.
Because the maternity pay and the decent job won't come overnight, and if you can't afford to fight then don't pick one. And I say that as someone who would always prefer to fight, but I can afford that stance. The OP obviously can't.
TheGoodFighter · 05/10/2022 14:04
Sine my point was a general one and didn't mention zero hours contracts, why should I feel the need to point to anything?
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
TheGoodFighter · 05/10/2022 13:58
It's possible illegal discrimination: being treated unfairly due to childcare considerations can often be indirect sex discrimination.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.