My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Work

On course to earn way over 40k this year with self employment, is it worth becoming a limited company?

10 replies

InkedGreen · 04/09/2019 20:47

It does save quite a bit of a tax, but accountant fees are £130 a month and seems like more work that will take me away from work.

Plus if the higher rate of tax is increased in the budget it doesn't save that much at all on a £70k profit a year

Wwyd?

OP posts:
Report
Racmactac · 04/09/2019 20:51

But you would leave the money in the business and only take a basic salary of £10k ish. The rest would be taken as dividends and therefore less tax to pay.

Report
Egghead68 · 05/09/2019 07:54

I am not sure it saves much tax. Don’t quote me but I think you have to pay 20% business tax on any profits then a further 19 or 20% tax on any dividends, I.e. nearly 40%. If you take money as a salary it may be even higher.

Report
Pythonesque · 05/09/2019 08:17

If you have family members who are not tax payers and can legitimately do some work for you, paying them can create some real tax savings overall. I would have a detailed discussion with your accountant about how the numbers would work out, advantages and disadvantages of becoming a company - worth paying for that so that you know your options both now and in the future.

Report
AtillatheHun · 05/09/2019 08:21

what do you do? if there is any benefit, it's in keeping the legal entity separate from your personal wealth so if the worst happened (eg negligent advice / faulty goods), the assets of the company are all that are at stake (assuming certain specific director's responsibilities don't apply)

Report
HugoSpritz · 05/09/2019 08:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

maryelizabeth71 · 05/09/2019 08:27

Depends on your individual situation. Ltd can give more advantages than purely tax savings.

£130 per month seem very high!

Report
Egghead68 · 05/09/2019 16:20

Just to say I would go for a private accountant who charges you only when they need to do work rather than a franchise like "Taxassist" who have a monthly fee (and you get virtually no contact with a qualified accoutant). Works out much cheaper I think.

Report
Namechangeforthiscancershit · 05/09/2019 16:26

It doesn't need to cost £130 a month at all. If you want to go down this route then get some more quotes for sure.

I'm not sure it's a lot more tax efficient at all is it? Unless you're planning to leave money in the co?

You need to think through liability issues too.

Report
Metempsychosis · 05/09/2019 16:29

I’d wait until after the next election if I were you. There could be big swings one way or the other.

Report
taxguru · 07/09/2019 11:46

There are a lot of pros/cons besides just the tax. You need to look at all aspects.

As for tax, yes, even at relatively low profits, it "may" be better. Depends on lots of factors, i.e. whether you need to draw out all the profits or whether you re-invest to grow the business. Whether you can benefit from your spouse being a shareholder and/or director. The kind of car you use for business and private v business mileage etc. Potentially better employment related benefits/rights. There are also some tax downsides, such as not being able to use the cash basis. Lots of aspects to put into the mix.

As for extra costs, that's because there's more to do, such as payroll for the director(s), extra tax return, more complicate accounts, etc.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.