For most of history, the whole point of feminism was to oppse sex-based segregation and restrictions that were imposed by patriarchal society.
So I don't see how supporting strict gender categories, and simply calling them "sex-based" instead, in any way leans itself to "gender abolition".
One might get impression that "gender" is simply being used to mean trans people existing, and "gender abolition" simply means restricting trans people from being able to transition and use different gender labels. And basically nothing else.
With "sex-based rules and restrictions" being basically just gender roles but trans-proofed.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex & gender discussions
How is it "gender critical" to impose rigid binary social categories based on sex?
999 replies
CuriousPanda · 13/07/2021 21:07
OP posts:
JustcameoutGC ·
13/07/2021 21:15
This reply has been deleted
Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.