Naomi Wolf finally suspended from Twitter

[ofwarren]

The writer of The Beauty Myth, turned conspiracy theorist has finally got the boot from Twitter.

I'll be happy not reading her bilge any more to be honest.

She gave us all a laugh with her "nanopatticles" nonsense though 😂

[ofwarren]

This was the tweet that was the final nail in the coffin apparently

[GNCQ]

What did she say? Was it about Covid? There's a lot of crap on Twitter about Covid. She must have tweeted something exceptionally wrongthink

[GNCQ]

Ah!

[OneEpisode]

That tweet is glorious. Thank you for sharing.

[GNCQ]

I was right! It's a very strange thing to post but i've read worse.

[Marguerite2000]

What an idiot.

[nauticant]

I do like this:

www.twitter.com/MikeBeauvais/status/1401026078316056578

[Lottapianos]

She honestly seems unwell, and has done for a while

[Nonmaquillee]

She’s lost the plot

[MangoSeason]

She has loony COVId conspiracy theories but so do a lot of other Twitter users. I think she was banned for inadvertently exposing TRA nonsense to so many people with her unhinged TRA cheerleading. Twitter can’t have that.

That said, as a free speech absolutist, I can’t celebrate this, even though I despise her COVID fear mongering and TRA nonsense.

[Siablue]

I honestly feel very sad for her. She seems genuinely unwell.

[EndoplasmicReticulum]

Oh no not mRNA in the drinking water!
I don't know how I manage, I'm covered in mRNA all day (I'm rough ER).

[Triphazards]

I like this one.

[RoyalCorgi]

Agree with Mango - on the free speech principle I don't think she should have been banned. Plus, her increasingly deranged tweets about vaccines gave us all so much pleasure.

[Coyoacan]

I dislike her betrayal of women, but I also thoroughly dislike a private company deciding what we can think and say about any number of issues.

Facebook is current censoring people who support the Mexican government while a Chilean friend reports that fb is censoring the opposition to the Chilean government.

[nauticant]

I was listening to the Today programme on Radio 4 earlier and there was a discussion with Kara Swisher (described by Newsweek as Silicon Valley's "most powerful tech journalist") about Trump's ban on Facebook. Her line, which I've heard from her before, is wholehearted support for the banning of bad people and for any authority to butt out because the social media giants are private companies and it's no one else's business what they choose to do. It's chilling, and very telling, to hear one of the most powerful and influential US journalists talking in these terms.

[VodselForDinner]

I also thoroughly dislike a private company deciding what we can think and say about any number of issues.

You do know you’re currently posting on the platform of a private company that regularly decides what members can say about a host of issues?

[Cwenthryth]

I’m on the fence about the suspension, because of her previously well respected standing, and that what she was posting is positively dangerous and massively irresponsible at the current time, and it’s a different thing to supporting one or other political party. I think.

I do agree that I genuinely think she seems quite unwell though, and hope that she has people close to her that are able to get her some help. Very sad to see.

[Mollyollydolly]

I don't think she's well.

[PandorasMailbox]

Wow (and no, she wasn't being sarcastic)

[ScreamingMeMe]

@Cwenthryth

I’m on the fence about the suspension, because of her previously well respected standing, and that what she was posting is positively dangerous and massively irresponsible at the current time, and it’s a different thing to supporting one or other political party. I think.

I do agree that I genuinely think she seems quite unwell though, and hope that she has people close to her that are able to get her some help. Very sad to see.

Agree with all of this. Thise tweets are jaw-dropping.

[toffeebutterpopcorn]

I don’t think she sounds well to be honest. Probably better for her if she just steps back for a while and keep away from the conspiracy nuts.

My brother was heading that way ‘vaccinating kids???!!!!!!!’ I pointed out the BCG, whooping cough, polio... etc immunisations we had as kids.

[Timeforabiscuit]

I really and truly hope that she gets help and support she needs right now, and that that those who support her in turn get support too.

It's not glorious at all, I mean we all have downright unpleasant people in our lives (and I have absolutely no idea if she is one of them), but this must be hell for those around her.

I think that social media barring should be the equivalent of the barman taking your car keys once you've had too much to drink. But crowing over someone who could be having a full blown crisis isn't palatable to me.

[NicknamesAreLikeKleenex]

Didn’t help that she was tweeting absolute bollocks about medicine as “Dr” with a blue tick to prove that yes she really was a doctor (of poetry).

[JediGnot]

@VodselForDinner

I also thoroughly dislike a private company deciding what we can think and say about any number of issues.

You do know you’re currently posting on the platform of a private company that regularly decides what members can say about a host of issues?

It is a really tough one IMHO.

On the one hand I firmly believe that rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. For example you have the right to give your opinion, but the responsibility not to lie or mislead in a way that could make life worse for others.

On the one hand I firmly believe that private companies have the right to ban who they want, on the other hand, given the power of the big platforms, it is very hard to see how people can have free speech whilst being banned from twitter etc. DO Mrs A and Mrs B both have free speech, when Mrs A can get her message out anywhere and Mrs B is banned from Twitter, facebook, instagram and youtube?

TLDR - The big tech companies need to have open, fair, transparent and consistent policies with proper appeals processes. Free speech is not free of consequence speech and if you are a danger to society with your words then you don't have a right to free speech.