Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 4 messages.)
This is a Premium feature
To use this feature subscribe to Mumsnet Premium - get first access to new features see fewer ads, and support Mumsnet.
Start using Mumsnet PremiumEconomist podcast - Keira Bell case
(4 Posts)Some very clearheaded reporting here, I thought:
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-intelligence/id1449631195?i=1000501070173
I’m always on look out for good podcast, I’ll check that out. Thanks
That's a good one. If dialogue hadn't been closed down, then I don't think the KB & Mrs A case would have been necessary. It has been a sign of weakness that 'no debate' has had to be used.
I enjoyed listening to that.
The language was refreshing. They used a term to refer to the young people who are assessed at the Tavistock that I don't think we're allowed to use, although many of us consider it more accurate than the terms we are allowed to use.
Are news outlets with a focus on business (and a more male-leaning audience?) are given more freedom to report clearly and objectively than other outlets? I can't imagine any liberal-leaning/ women-focused organisations giving such a straight account of the judgement.
Anyway, hurrah for the economist for their clear-headed reporting!
Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 4 messages.)
Join the discussion
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.
Join MumsnetAlready have a Mumsnet account? Log in
Compose Message
Please login first.