Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 4 messages.)
This is a Premium feature
To use this feature subscribe to Mumsnet Premium - get first access to new features see fewer ads, and support Mumsnet.
Start using Mumsnet PremiumProstasia
(4 Posts)I’m sure this organisation has been discussed before on FWR. This popped up in my Twitter feed today. There seem to be a number of red flags for a group calling itself a child protection organisation.
“The Prostasia Foundation is a tax-exempt California non-profit which describes itself as “a new child protection organization that is inclusive of ... kinky people, and sex workers."
Of course both sex workers and kinky people might have children and be concerned about their protection. It’s less to me why you’d need to specify them in your mission statement.
www.prostasia.info/
Twitter thread.
mobile.twitter.com/ferdeline/status/1273664868474896387
Yes I saw that.
This is the previous thread.
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3608751-Prostasia-Foundation-Child-protection-or-dismantling-Safeguarding
God that old thread is like a time machine.
Frightening how fast things moved on.
They tried to threaten Sarah Phillimore too, didn't they?
Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 4 messages.)
Join the discussion
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.
Join MumsnetAlready have a Mumsnet account? Log in
Compose Message
Please login first.