My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Royal Institution getting a pasting on Twitter

220 replies

EwwSprouts · 26/02/2020 16:54

"If you identify as a woman" they'd like you to complete their survey to understand what women watch. twitter.com/Ri_Science/status/1232681119939731458

OP posts:
Report
Thelnebriati · 26/02/2020 16:59

Some of the answers;
''The Royal Institution. Science Lives Here. But Has Let A Room To Some Unscientific Woo.''

''I have an idea. Every 20 seconds, hard cut to a kitten playing with a ball of wool for a few seconds - that'll keep those easily-distracted women paying attention to all that sciency stuff.''

''I "Identify" as a particle physicist. Can I have a go on the hadron collider?''

''I’m identifying as a brain surgeon tomorrow. Really looking forward to my first day on the job. Can’t be that hard, can it?''

  • ''Only if you have a ladybrain''

    ''I identify as a woman because I want the £20 voucher.''
Report
FamilyOfAliens · 26/02/2020 17:00

From a science organisation. You couldn’t make this shit up.

Report
EwwSprouts · 26/02/2020 17:03

I liked this for cutting to the chase
"Shame on you. Peddling this snake oil bullshit."

OP posts:
Report
ListeningQuietly · 26/02/2020 17:04

oh dear oh dear

Report
fascinated · 26/02/2020 17:05

The media team are probably social sciences types

Report
Awning10 · 26/02/2020 17:11

Thanks for link.

Report
WrathofFaeKlopp · 26/02/2020 17:11

They're conducting a survey asking anyone who identifies as a woman?

I need to sit down.
It beggars belief.

What has identifying as a woman got to do with anything?

Report
ListeningQuietly · 26/02/2020 17:12

The RI has horrific staff turnover and lost its way years ago
but "identify as" is unforgivable

Report
Mrsfrumble · 26/02/2020 17:14

Even without the “identify” nonsense, it’s a disappointingly patronising question. Why should women need a specific reason to watch science videos? Did they think we were trawling YouTube for make-up tutorials and stumbled upon them by mistake?

Report
TwoHeadedYellowBelliedHoleDig · 26/02/2020 17:16

For crying out loud.

Report
WrathofFaeKlopp · 26/02/2020 17:19

When it comes to the design of survey questions, how about asking women what they think they should be asking.

Report
celtiethree · 26/02/2020 17:24

Interestingly they changed their language on Facebook which was posted later to ‘if you are a woman’

Report
Mockersisrightasusual · 26/02/2020 17:24

Michael Faraday must be turning in her grave.

Report
Gingerkittykat · 26/02/2020 17:27

I wanted a further comment box on the survey so I could tell them I watch videos about biology and not gender.

Report
RoyalCorgi · 26/02/2020 17:35

Michael Faraday must be turning in her grave.

Grin

Report
WrathofFaeKlopp · 26/02/2020 17:37

How about designing a survey aimed at getting men more proactive in the home.

How about we set up a consultant panel of 5 people consisting of 2 women and 2 lesbians and a trans man.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Report
iguanadonna · 26/02/2020 17:41

Not only that, but the survey is incredibly patronizing.

I had so much fun answering it.

Let's just say there's a comment box, plus you can give them whatever name and email address you like.

Report
Babdoc · 26/02/2020 17:54

I take huge comfort from the massively gender critical replies - everybody, both male and female, calling the RI out on this unscientific nonsense. At last, some common sense from the previously silent majority. Keep it coming!

Report
Cuntysnark · 26/02/2020 17:55

I told them I watch The Clangers for proper Astro physics stuff..

Report
mindtheclegs · 26/02/2020 17:57

I had fun answering that survey too Grin

Report
BritneyPeedOnALadybug · 26/02/2020 17:57

Oh dear!



Royal Institution
@Ri_Science
·
24m
Replying to
@Ri_Science
We’re really sad to see the negative feedback this tweet has received - we want to be as inclusive as possible. Our most recent video had an 89/11 demographic split, and through this survey we’re trying to understand why

Report
ListeningQuietly · 26/02/2020 17:58

I've subscribed to New Scientist for over 30 years and still find theoretical cosmology articles mind numbingly dull Grin

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BritneyPeedOnALadybug · 26/02/2020 17:59

People quite rightly replying to that tweet ^ asking how they know it’s an 89/11 split if they don’t know what sex is.

Report
ListeningQuietly · 26/02/2020 18:01

Our most recent video had an 89/11 demographic split
89 what to 11 what though ?
Sorry but that is piffle as my youtube channel does not look inside the underwear of viewers, especially those who are not signed in Hmm

Report
PreseaCombatir · 26/02/2020 18:12

A personal favourite from that feed...

RI: "please give us feedback"
women "OK, here you go"
RI: "Wrong sort of feedback. Bad feedback. Bad ladies. Why aren't the wimmins making us feel happy feels ?"

#bekind

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.