My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (Thread title edited by MNHQ)

994 replies

Whackitupto200 · 08/07/2019 09:27

JY’s parent sounds like an absolute loon. It would explain a lot.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1147905523347365888.html

OP posts:
Report
Whackitupto200 · 08/07/2019 09:28
OP posts:
Report
littlbrowndog · 08/07/2019 09:31

Yeah I have been following that twitter

When the parent burst into court room😆

It’s absolutely bonkers. Then the chat about tampons. 🤦‍♀️
Then when the paramedics were called by the parent
Wtaf is going on in Canada

Report
Erythronium · 08/07/2019 09:36

I can't believe this has gone to court. A woman running a tiny business from her own home being persecuted because she has boundaries about safety. Disgusting.

Report
Erythronium · 08/07/2019 09:37

"Member says she must decide 5 things:

  1. Nature of JY's gender identity
  2. Scope of service
  3. If JY's gender identity was element of denial
  4. If gender identity was a factor, is denial allowed
  5. Any remedy if required"

    The rights of predatory autogynephiles, now encoded into Canadian law.
Report
MingingInTheRain · 08/07/2019 09:39

Jesus fucking christ what is going on in that hearing?? It sounds barking and I bet all the court staff will be pissing themselves about it for weeks.

Report
Destinysdaughter · 08/07/2019 09:39

Despite the fact that this is really serious, reading it is comedy gold!

Report
Erythronium · 08/07/2019 09:39

"JY Opening Statement:

  • discusses how important being a woman is to them
  • says they embody femininity
  • as a child was "girly" and always "prancing" around
  • was diagnosed with gender dysphoria as child though was not called GD back then
  • has support & love of family"


All of which meant that JY needed their testicles waxed by a woman.

The tweets say there is no press covering this. Journalists know a story when they see one, this is being actively suppressed.
Report
Erythronium · 08/07/2019 09:42

Freak:

"Member asks

  • why on exhibit 2 does JY ask if "I" can receive service while on period?"
Report
KettlePolly · 08/07/2019 09:47

It should at least highlight the ludicrous consequences of conflating biological sex and gender identity.

Also I am now plagued with a mental image of where they were planning to put that tampon Confused

I know not everyone believes AGP is a thing but the whole case is suffused with evidence for it. The fetishistic obsession with periods is distinctly creepy.

Report
Popchyk · 08/07/2019 09:52

Bloody hell.

The fact that this tribunal is even entertaining this nonsense is chilling. But that's the mess that Canada has got itself into.

Defence lawyer says "defendant is not being asked to wax a gender identity". Quite.

Report
Erythronium · 08/07/2019 09:54

It's true, it's comedy gold:

There is a knock on the hearing room door. It is a couple of paramedics called by JY's parent

I love the way 'parent' hasn't been gendered in this account.

Report
sneakypinky · 08/07/2019 09:57

Pure insanity. Stop the world.

Report
AncientLights · 08/07/2019 09:58

They don't need television there with fun like that in their town. Insanity.

Report
ArnoldWhatshisknickers · 08/07/2019 09:58

Again with the tampons.

How downright thick does a person have to be to not see the fetish staring at them?

Report
plattercake · 08/07/2019 10:02

I think it is abundantly clear that JY has serious mental illness.

Report
Flippertybob · 08/07/2019 10:03

"Lawyer says must address JY's genitals in a case like this."

I did a double-take at this bit then realised it probably wasn't meant literally. :o

Report
Manderleyagain · 08/07/2019 10:04

That thread is something else! Not a single journalist is ridiculous. Someone on the thread said that it's because they know they can't spin it within the twaw framework. I think that's probably true.

Surely Beauty Therapy Weekly or whatever should be covering it?

Report
dontdoxmeeither · 08/07/2019 10:07

I so hope that the tribunal are indulgent to the point (if not already) is reached about how ludicrous, dangerous and vexatious he is. And how in everything that's holy, is there no media coverage? Has it been banned/restricted?

Report
Popchyk · 08/07/2019 10:07

And interesting that JY is using online accounts with their male name, other accounts with a female name but picture of a random woman.

It is obvious that JY is trying to work an angle with these different accounts.

But yanno, you created the problem, Canada. Up to you to fix it.

You know JY will be suing the tribunal next, right?

Be good to see some chickens come home to roost at the local politicians and law makers who helped to create this mess.

Report
littlbrowndog · 08/07/2019 10:10

Yes popchyk

Report
OvaHere · 08/07/2019 10:10

I can't believe not a single journalist has attended. Whilst on one hand it's utterly ridiculous drama from JY it's still an important case re wider implications.

Reading that tweet thread the whole things sounds utterly bonkers with the parent storming in and out periodically and calling out paramedics.

I can't imagine anyone not seeing the situation for what it is. If the Canadian authorities find in favour of JY then they are a lost cause. I don't know what else to say really.

Report
vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 08/07/2019 10:14

I am not sure that this case is in JY's best interests. This person appears to be quite unwell.

I hope the legal system staff are being well paid, I'd want a significant raise to deal with this shit.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BlooperReel · 08/07/2019 10:27

If this doesn't highlight, in neon, JY's fetishism, predatory and litigious nature, then nothing will. If JY 'wins' this case, the world is fucking doomed.

Report
Datun · 08/07/2019 10:51

I'm sure JY won a hearing where their identity was to be kept confidential, didn't he?

They can't call JY a transwoman because it's outing they can't call them a man, as misgendering. So they can't actually mention the genitals in a newspaper.

Which could account for the reporting restriction. How do you report it without actually reporting it, as it were?

Idiocy. And they didn't see this coming????? Do they live in a bubble?

Report
BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 08/07/2019 11:05

Cor blimey

Can you imagine the British press ignoring something like this? Even though things aren’t perfect here, I can’t, thankfully

Really pleased it’s being tweeted at least

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.