My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex & gender discussions

Wings of Scotland court case

207 replies

ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 16:39

Brief context:

Ex Scottish labour Kezia Dugdale said (in print) that Wings was a homophobe because of a tweet he made.

The reason I think this case may be of interest is because so far:

Chelsea Manning is mentioned. @WingsScotland says Manning is ‘brave’ & a ‘hero’ but has repeatedly been accused of transphobia for his language towards the whistleblower. ‘An empirical biological fact that he is still a man,’ Campbell tells the court.

.@WingsScotland adds that he doesn’t know Manning’s sexuality & says it has no bearing on accusations of homophobia. Various comments by Wings referring to Manning as ‘he’. Being a transphobe does not make you a homophobe, Wings adds.

OP posts:
Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 16:40
OP posts:
Report
BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 25/03/2019 16:43

so Wings Of Scotland has taken Kezia Dugdale to court for defamation because she accused him of being a homophobe?

Report
BettyDuMonde · 25/03/2019 16:45

Oh come on, Kezia, you are a lesbian! Stand up for same sex attracted people, especially women loving women.

Manning has tons of support, regardless of how Manning presents or who Manning has relationships with.

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 16:54

so Wings Of Scotland has taken Kezia Dugdale to court for defamation because she accused him of being a homophobe?

Yes.

More twittage:

Just in case things weren’t contentious enough, the court is now getting into whether Mr Campbell thinks Chelsea Manning is a woman or not. Mr Dunlop says if Mr Campbell is entitled to the view that Chelsea Manning is a man, aren’t others entitled to the view that CM is a woman?

Mr Campbell says “if I proclaim I’m Napoleon, am I? If I proclaim I’m black, am I?” He says people “should be allowed to live their lives however they want”, but he objects to “people ordering me” to say something he doesn’t believe is true - that Chelsea Manning is a woman.

Mr Dunlop and Mr Campbell are having quite a lengthy exchange about the difference between “transgender” and “transsexual” and the use of various pronouns; Sheriff Ross asks if this line of questioning is really worth pursuing

Next witness in the Wings-Dugdale case is Colin McFarlane, director of Stonewall Scotland.

Mr Macfarlane (apologies for spelling in previous tweet) says he wasn’t previously (before the March 2017 Mundell tweet) aware that Wings Over Scotland had any views on gay rights. Court now examining Stonewall’s definition of homophobia.

Mr Sandison - QC for Mr Campbell - is so far mostly asking Mr Macfarlane about gender self-identification, which has become a rather large subplot in this case. There is a “diversity of viewpoints” on the matter, they agree

OP posts:
Report
BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 25/03/2019 16:56

I am reading with interest - thank you

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 17:06

It's interesting Dugdales team seem to be making the argument that if he is transphobic he must be homophobic.

So will see if court decides if that is true, and if court decides that stating biologocal fact is transphobic.

This case could have some interesting outcomes - I had no idea transphobia was going to be brought up in it.

OP posts:
Report
R0wantrees · 25/03/2019 17:10

Court now examining Stonewall’s definition of homophobia.


It will be interesting if they also examine Stonewall's deninition of transphobia.

Report
nauticant · 25/03/2019 17:16

Interesting tweets. Especially so to see the line taken against Campbell that he has been a meanie in a number of contexts.

It would be useful for this court case to reinforce the message that being a bit of a meanie does not necessarily mean that someone is guilty of whatever offence they're accused of.

Report
LassOfFyvie · 25/03/2019 17:23

Wings Over Scotland has taken Kezia Dugdale to court for defamation because she accused him of being a homophobe?

The allegedly homophobic remarks relate to comments he made about the father of Conservative MSP Oliver Mundell.

Report
RepealTheGRA · 25/03/2019 17:30

Interesting! Thank you for the thread.

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 17:35

The tweet in question:

Wings of Scotland court case
OP posts:
Report
nauticant · 25/03/2019 17:35

Some background:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-47693895

I really don't see that tweet is being homophobia. There may be a surrounding context I'm unaware of, of course. (I'm not a WoS fan.)

Report
BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 25/03/2019 17:36

Yes, I don’t read that tweet as homophobic either...?

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 17:38

I suspect this may be the surrounding context:

wingsoverscotland.com/?s=Kezia+Dugdale

OP posts:
Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 17:40

I really don't see that tweet is being homophobia

I wonder if that's why transphobia is being brought into it? It's all under the LGBT umbrella after all, and he is undoubtedly transphobic by today's rather loose definition.

OP posts:
Report
PencilsInSpace · 25/03/2019 17:45

Counsel starts running through Wings tweets, including calling someone a ‘sanctimonious wank hole’.
Counsel: What is a wank hole?
Wings: A hole into which one might wank, he explains.
Scottish politics 2019 here.

Grin

Report
happydappy2 · 25/03/2019 17:47

I wouldn't read that as homophobic....but I do worry that we are wandering into a situation where stating biological truth IS transphobic & therefore hate speech-which is ridiculous.

Report
BernardBlacksWineIcelolly · 25/03/2019 17:47

Actually loling

Wank hole

Grin

Report
nauticant · 25/03/2019 17:47

From your context link ItsAllGoingToBeFine:

Kezia Dugdale Fact Check, Part 683

That fits in neatly with the Communication Act 2003, section 127:

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience ... to another, he—
...
(c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

Report
RepealTheGRA · 25/03/2019 17:49

That tweets funny not homophobic!?!

And I’m stealing ‘sanctimonious wank hole’.

I wonder if he posts here? Are there any tweets about cockwombles, wankbadgers or fucknuggets?

Report
RepealTheGRA · 25/03/2019 17:50

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience ... to another, he—
...
(c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.


When is Piers Morgan’s court case?

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 25/03/2019 18:07

That fits in neatly with the Communication Act 2003, section 127:

Bit worrying if political fact checking comes under that...

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BickerinBrattle · 25/03/2019 20:21

Let it not be forgotten that Manning punched a female commanding officer in the face and gloated about what they’d done to “the dyke.”

Report
BlackForestCake · 25/03/2019 20:27

Wings has been very steadfast in opposing the TWAW nonsense. Of course, this makes the, er, sanctimonious wankholes in both pro- and anti-independence groups hate him even more.

Report
Ereshkigal · 25/03/2019 20:29

Good on him. I know nothing about Scottish independence politics so I do understand that some Scottish posters may not like him for other reasons, but he's great on the gender stuff.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.