My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

It's a sad day when pie has power on mn

110 replies

Floorplan · 22/07/2018 01:18

Why not just engage @mnhq

OP posts:
Report
CoteDAzur · 22/07/2018 01:24

Who?

Report
Jozxyqk · 22/07/2018 01:26

Assume Paedophile Information Exchange. What did I miss?

Report
BoreOfWhabylon · 22/07/2018 01:28

I think OP might mean Paedophile Information Exchange Cote Hmm

What is this thread about Floorplan?

Report
NewbieSpartacus · 22/07/2018 01:46

This maybe:

Offred

This is probably going to be my last post on MN. I have been deleted twice on another thread for the same thing as Lang (despite clearly stating I was not conflating paedophiles and TRAs but highlighting how paedophiles are exploiting trans rights by posting on SM in support of trans rights in order to promote ‘paedosexuality’).

We are not allowed to mention that paeodphiles are actively exploiting this ideology in order to normalise paedophilia. This is a bridge too far for me for a parenting website.

My personal feeling is that if they are going so far as to delete any mention of how paedophiles have planned to, and are now carrying through that plan to, exploit this then ultimately what HQ are doing is protecting paedophiles under the guise of ‘dealing with transphobia’ based on reports from unknown people on the internet.

I’ll not be party to that, I wasn’t going to come back at all but I have been mulling over whether people should know...

Report
thebewilderness · 22/07/2018 02:39

Feminists on the Feminist board of a parenting website are not allowed to talk about male predators grooming children online.
You would think it would be one of the most common problems women discuss here since is is such a widespread problem but any attempt to do so is deleted as a violation of talk guidelines.

Report
Monstamio · 22/07/2018 05:18

Has Offred been banned? Shock

Report
EmpressWeaponisedClitoris · 22/07/2018 05:28

God that's ironic...

It's a sad day when pie has power on mn
Report
Monstamio · 22/07/2018 05:29

Well indeed. I've just read the thread in question. Chilling.

Report
Maryzsnewaccount · 22/07/2018 07:00

This will be deleted as a TAAT, won't it?

Which is appalling - it deserves it's own thread and everyone should know about it.

We are losing so many good posters Sad.

Report
Maryzsnewaccount · 22/07/2018 07:05

What was the original thread, by the way? I've seen the "protecting women and girls" one, but there must be another I've missed.

Report
CoteDAzur · 22/07/2018 08:19

"I think OP might mean Paedophile Information Exchange Cote Hmm"

How the fuck am I supposed to know that?

Here, have a Hmm yourself.

Report
BoreOfWhabylon · 22/07/2018 09:05

Cote the Hmm wasn't aimed at you!

I thought this was a troll thread when I read it, as it was so odd, but see now that it's something else entirely.

Report
Rufustheyawningreindeer · 22/07/2018 09:08

Oh for goodness sake

It must be quite obvious that nefarious groups will piggy back on to perfectly 'innocent' groups

It happens all the time

Report
CoteDAzur · 22/07/2018 09:10

Sorry Bore, I didn't get that. It was a bit too early in the morning for me Flowers

Report
BeyondRadicalisationPortal · 22/07/2018 09:11

You'd think it was obvious from the way PIE have historically already done it with homosexuality!!

(i also missed the thread though)

Report
Rufustheyawningreindeer · 22/07/2018 09:14

Well exactly beyond

Report
SophieLMumsnet · 22/07/2018 09:20

Hi all,

We're not saying you can't talk about PIE or paedophiles at all, so by all means start an individual thread about it - but do avoid conflation of TRA and PIE tactics, which we've previously mentioned on this thread.

If anyone would like to query one of their post deletions, then by all means mail in and we're always happy to discuss it.

Report
BoreOfWhabylon · 22/07/2018 09:20

It's all good cote Smile

Report
ShirleyPhallus · 22/07/2018 09:20

It says at the top that MNHQ have commented on this thread but there is no comment, and the clicking on the link doesn’t go anywhere?

Report
ShirleyPhallus · 22/07/2018 09:21

Ohhhh.... cross post

Report
ItsAllGoingToBeFine · 22/07/2018 09:25

but do avoid conflation of TRA and PIE tactics, which we've previously mentioned on this thread

But the tactics are noticeably similar even if the end goal is different Hmm

Report
ToeToToe · 22/07/2018 09:26

I very, very nearly left MN for good because of that thread SophieMN has linked to.

I was on there under a different Username - and the deletions sickened me.

This is a parenting website FFS. If we can't name the tactics PIE are using in order to normalise and legalise child sexual abuse (yes, they want the age of consent lowered or gone) - then MN cannot call itself a parent support site, IMO.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

R0wantrees · 22/07/2018 09:35

Important current thread focussed on Safeguarding and systemic failings /failures with regards child protection and protection of vulnerable adults:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3301266-Safeguarding-girls-and-protecting-women-post-Jimmy-Saville-metoo

Report
VickyEadie · 22/07/2018 10:02

Hey, MNHQ - "tactics" used by entirely different, separate groups with entirely different ethics, aims and objectives - can be identical "tactics".

Surely you can see that?

Report
TellsEveryoneRealFacts · 22/07/2018 10:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.