I have been thinking about a completely disgusting Twitter trope doing the rounds, that asserts:
if you accept black women under the brolly of feminism, you must accept transwomen
This usually leads to some kind of phrase like:
if your feminism isn't intersectional, it isn't feminism
To me, it sounds so completely clunky to equate black women to transwomen in a logical sense (ignoring the racist overtone), so I've been trying to nail down my thoughts.
Knowing nothing about intersectionality in social theory, I have had a brief read. I am about to completely oversimplify, but I'm a scientist and I like logic and categories :) Please see my thoughts and tell me where I'm going wrong.
- Black women are oppressed in two categories - their race and their sex. Thus, a black woman has a different experience to a white woman of being a woman. The intersect is the overlap in the two categories of a Venn diagram (race and sex).
Below is where my own thoughts have taken over from proper reading
- Other categories that may require an intersectional approach are age, socioeconomic class? Not an exhaustive list, but the aging thing is relevant because it's where I'm going to draw my comparison.... So, I can clearly visualise Venn diagrams with an intersect between these categories and sex, that may lead to different experiences.
- I cannot visualise "trans" (or the dreaded "cis", but it must be included for posterity) as a category. I can't see the circle it creates. I got to thinking that cis/trans is actually a modifier of the sex category, rather than a category in itself.
Now it gets wierd
- Trying to understand how cis/trans modifies the sex category, I arrived at the rather clunky idea that cis/trans represent the mechanism of belonging to that sex category. So cis/trans is a mechanism, not a category.
- There are mechanisms for how one becomes to belong to the race and age categories. The former is dictated by "level of melanin production" and the latter is dictated by "time". Neither of those things is a category in itself ; rather, they are ways of inserting a person into the specific category to which they relate.
So, "black" and "trans" are not the same type of descriptor and thus cannot be compared in the context of intersectional feminism. Trans is not a category and cannot intersect.
How am I doing? I'll stop there, because I've bored everyone to death, talked utter shite, rediscovered the wheel or am about to get a Novel prize.
TL;DR Intersectional feminism can accommodate black women because race and sex are two formal categories. It cannot accommodate transwomen because trans is not a category