Wasnt India on tv only yesterday, suggesting that a womens refuge shouldnt be exclusively for Natal Women, yet here she is advocating and tweeting about a Trans exclusive Safe house? (Which as it happens I fully support)
My issue is by no means the concept, as I fully support and encourage safe spaces for Trans gender individuals, but then surely that applies in reverse? That vulnerable Women should be fully entitled to keep safe spaces for themselves too? India needs to decide what side of the fence she is on IMO, she is sending a very contradictory and confusing message here.
That said I’m pretty sure I could rock up at any of those, declare my right to be there and get treated.
People like India don’t deal in facts, they deal in perceived rights and self-identification. Her complete hypocrisy on the matter doesn’t surprise me at all. She believes she’s both trans and a woman and has the right to be both and access spaces for both.
I also think it's great to have trans exclusive resources. As someone who has fund raised and literally painted walls to set up a rape crisis centre for women, I applaud any group establishing their own resources.
Re the inconsistency - the whole trans ideology is shot through with inconsistencies from the very principle - to transition into a woman .... which therefore means that of course you are not a 'real' woman - you have transitioned!! That's why they are so desperate for #nodebate as the whole charade collapses once you actually hear what is being said. IW and many other MiT will never understand many things that women share cos they're transitioned as opposed to biological women.
I dont have a private twitter, only a business one, so dont dare call her out on the hypocrisy publicly, however I do wonder if there are any brave and eloquent twitter users here willing to expose this nonsense in her argument? If not already blocked by India of course!