Sorry for the Trump-inspired title - couldn't resist, given that it's actually pertinent to the subject.
I'm hoping for some useful insights here. I'm a woman in tech and trying and failing to place women on my client projects. My firm is actively supportive and not the problem in this particular case. Much to my horror, however, I've become somewhat of a repository of real-life examples of the kind of female self-sabotage commonly described in literature.
For the purpose of illustration, these are some of the most recent gems from actual client interviews that I sat in on and cringed my way through:
- [Candidate is asked about her professional history and does fine up to describing her A-levels, then volunteers the following] ... so I enrolled at Oxford but then I failed my math exams [...] and then I failed the exam again and was made to leave, so I enrolled with the OU instead because there are no formal acceptance criteria
- I just put that project on my CV for fillers, really my colleagues did almost all of the work on it. I only [description of precisely what she was interviewing for].
- I reckon one could [perfect response to the question] - but I've only read that and have never actually done it in practice
- ...
These are all highly competent women whom I would have placed easily had they not opted to take a mid-sized nuke and shoot themselves in the foot with it. I see an urgent need to actively coach my women to do better in such situations but, TBH, really don't know where to start. The issue is obviously bigger than just my projects, the problem being that it doesn't make commercial sense for the firm to keep on pushing its female quota if we can't get our current women employees staffed to begin with.
Possibly relevant: I don't do great at self-promotion myself but am aware that it's part of the job and actively self-police in such situations.
I'm in a perfect position to push the issue and maybe even start a larger initiative but could really use some helpful input.