Advanced search

Reporting of divorce settlements

(16 Posts)
WhatKatyDidnt Fri 12-May-17 09:19:22

This headline in the Guardian caught my eye this morning: wife gets £453m in one of biggest divorce settlements

Reading further it seems that a judge essentially split the £1bn marital assets 50:50, given that the woman's (unpaid) work in the home had supported the man's (paid) work outside the home. Sounds fair enough.

Why are these cases always reported - even in a so-called progressive newspaper - as wifey walking off with hubby's cash?

WhatKatyDidnt Fri 12-May-17 09:22:22

Trying again with the link:


cheminotte Tue 16-May-17 06:57:36

I guess exceptions make headlines. Woman gets nothing as husband claims to be self employed wouldn't be that interesting would it?

Collidascope Tue 16-May-17 07:07:49

It's interesting that it's painted as the wife "getting" or "being awarded". They're marital assets, for God's sake. Most articles state that, but it's still always the wife being "given" the money, as opposed to the judge allocating the money to both hisband and wife.

Collidascope Tue 16-May-17 07:08:17


ThisIsStartingToBoreMe Tue 16-May-17 07:13:31

This annoys me intensely. My ex dh gave me nothing - I did however get MY 50% of the marital assets

Apachepony Tue 16-May-17 07:15:20

I can't get annoyed about this. I think uk divorce laws are crazy.

ThisIsStartingToBoreMe Tue 16-May-17 07:15:51

And my next door neighbour keeps bleating on and on about how he "gave ". His ex £250k. He gave her nothing!!! Half the assets were hers anyway

ThisIsStartingToBoreMe Tue 16-May-17 07:16:39

Why are U.K. Divorce laws crazy?

Apachepony Tue 16-May-17 07:25:14

The whole 50% (or more) thing, regardless of how much you brought to a marriage. A SAHM married to a rich man doesn't necessarily work any harder than a SAHM of a poor man, but ends up so much better off. I don't think it's like that in other countries. However, I'm the higher earner in my marriage and so probably biased, I know that's far from the most mumsnet consensus!

Apachepony Tue 16-May-17 07:25:58

Random "most" in there...

Faithless12 Tue 16-May-17 07:43:09

Apachepony she can only take what's there no one can magic up money so the poor mans wife can have the same as the rich mans wife. It's also likely that the rich SAHM also worked and possibly in the same area as her husband so it's not like she married lucky.

QuentinSummers Tue 16-May-17 07:55:34

apache the SAHM wife of a rich man is a massive enabler to him being rich! Why should he get to benefit more from her giving up her own career to support him, than a poor man?

PigletWasPoohsFriend Tue 16-May-17 07:58:56

I do think that assets pre marriage should be safeguarded though.

Not sure how it could be done.

splendide Tue 16-May-17 08:13:02

It's just the nature of marriage though. You go into a partnership and that includes everything being marital assets. I don't think the "enables his earning" is a very helpful or accurate argument.

I'm a much higher earner than DH. Honestly I don't buy that he enables me to be a high earner. He doesn't do anything differently than if I earned £20k or £50k rather than what I do earn. In fact he does less as I can afford things that help us both out.

I consider all our money to be joint and if we divorce he'll get half. I'm ok with this or I wouldn't have married. I still think the suggestion that being, what, a particularly brilliant SAHP means the household earns more is bollocks.

MadreRumba Tue 16-May-17 08:22:23

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: