My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The use of cis gender

110 replies

Ollycat · 17/12/2016 10:05

I've read the trans threads and they've definitely been an eye opener! I would say I'm definitely Spartacus!

Can someone enlighten me on the whole cis thing? When did it start becoming prevalent and who was the driving force behind it? The phrase cis woman is something I find quite disturbing- I am a woman plain and simple- not something which needs a quantifier.

Sorry if this is really basic stuff but am intrigued as to how this sort of terminology has become a "thing" and how it's becoming ok for men to define/ explain to women what it means to be a woman?

Genuinely confused and shocked about the whole thing.

OP posts:
Report
ChocChocPorridge · 17/12/2016 10:40

It's a language trick:

If there are trans women and cis women then they're both women but with a descriptor - ie two subsets of a super-set 'Woman'

If there are transwomen and women (note the lack of space), then it's clear that transwomen are a separate set from women (which are a separate set from men).

This manipulation is one of the reasons I wouldn't use it - because I don't think that transwomen are a subset of women, but should be considered a subset of men (expanding the bandwidth of what being a man means - to hijack another's phrase)

Report
shinynewusername · 17/12/2016 10:47

"I do not identify as a cis woman" is a useful phrase Wink

ChocChoc has it exactly right.

Report
DameDeDoubtance · 17/12/2016 12:42

What really pisses me off is when you are labelled cis women and are thought to wholeheartedly accept all the shit that is lumped on your sex, just 'cause you've not opted out by choosing one of the new shiny names.

Report
MoreThanUs · 17/12/2016 12:46

ChocChoc I agree.
Could you talk me through the significance of the lack of space between 'trans' and 'woman' though. I like it instinctively but not sure I get it. Thanks

Report
TheGruffaloMother · 17/12/2016 12:48

Essentially, everybody is allowed to choose their own terminology bar those who don't feel they need a qualifier. Then the terminology will be chosen for you by those who feel they do.

Go figure.

Report
Ollycat · 17/12/2016 13:09

Thank you.

To me, as well as being totally unnecessary the term cis woman doesn't sound massively complimentary- we are women not just a subset of women...

OP posts:
Report
0dfod · 17/12/2016 13:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Yoarchie · 17/12/2016 13:37

Is this a woman thing though?

Are the terms cis man and trans man not used (I am asking as I have no idea, not to cause an argument)

Report
Datun · 17/12/2016 13:43

Yoarchie

They are used, but the conflict is largely more between transwomen and women. Men don't tend to be bothered in the same way if a transman tries to compete with them in sport or want to use the bathrooms.

Report
YetAnotherSpartacus · 17/12/2016 13:49

FtT tend not to rabbit on about 'cis men' in the same way that MtT go on about 'cis women'.

Report
FloraFox · 17/12/2016 14:07

Look at this. No-one on this cover is identified as female whereas the male is not identified as cis male but just male.

The use of cis gender
Report
ChocChocPorridge · 17/12/2016 14:09

Could you talk me through the significance of the lack of space between 'trans' and 'woman' though. I like it instinctively but not sure I get it. Thanks

well, they're trying to say that 'trans' is like any other modifier - tall woman, skinny woman, asian woman, trans woman, just another type of woman.

If there's no space, then it's not a modifier, it's a noun, a thing in it's own right without necessarily a relation to another similar word.

Transwomen don't want to be a thing other than a woman, they want to be a type of woman. It's subtle, but language is important, it makes a difference (or marketing departments and politicians wouldn't hire so many people to make sure they use the right ones)

Report
Aftertheraincomesthesun · 17/12/2016 14:22

It's bollocks talk.

Report
JAPAB · 17/12/2016 14:39

To me, as well as being totally unnecessary...

If a stranger on the internet simply declares "I am a man/woman" this does not give all information about them. OK in a general discussion I would assume that they have an XY/XX chromosome respectively, and would overwhelmingly be likely to be correct - though not always.

For the times when it is important to know more detail "I am a non-trans, non-gender binary, non-agender man/woman" is a bit clunky.

If they just said "I am a cis-man/woman" this tells you the previous but quicker.

It is all very well a stranger knowing what they mean by a term but sometimes there needs to be distinctions made.

Report
DameDeDoubtance · 17/12/2016 14:46

Oh, I see JAPAB. So the new words are to help me, a woman, be better understood. Gosh. Hadn't thought of it like that before but now it all seems so clear.

Flora the female is probably making the tea for them all to enjoy afterwards.

Report
Datun · 17/12/2016 15:00

JAPAB. I do have a question. Under what circumstances would the word 'woman' be insufficient, but the words ' non-gender binary woman' be sufficient. Unless you're describing your personality.

Report
FloraFox · 17/12/2016 15:01

JAPAB "I am a woman" means just that. If a man says it he is lying. Women don't need to contort their words to accommodate a man lying about his sex.

Report
ChocChocPorridge · 17/12/2016 15:03

For the times when it is important to know more detail "I am a non-trans, non-gender binary, non-agender man/woman" is a bit clunky

If they just said "I am a cis-man/woman" this tells you the previous but quicker

Or, alternatively you can be even quicker, by having the shortest word for the most frequent - ie man, woman, then longer words for the variations, just like you'd do with virtually everything else.

As a programmer, who deals with vast quantities of data flowing through my code, which I have to process as fast as possible, I can assure you that this is the most efficient use of characters.

Report
Bauble16 · 17/12/2016 15:07

This actually offends me deeply. I read it earlier in complete disgust . I was originally very accepting of transgender men and women, I still am really.

But I will not accept that my 7 year old son has been taught about all this gender madness at school and I truly fear for his future. Too many labels, so much so that kids can't just be just kids. I went through many confusions as a teen, all normally although god knows what labels and how swept away I would have been in this day and age. Scary! I'm sure I read there are over 50 different gender labels. Wtf!

Report
Datun · 17/12/2016 15:11

One of the genders ( I forget which) means I am only interested in hooking up with someone on a romantic, non-sexual basis. But as they can all be 'fluid' this can all change tomorrow. In what self obsessed world to we need a label for every possible permutation of someone's personality. There are 76 genders now. Everyone's special.

Report
SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 17/12/2016 15:17

I do not identify as a ciswoman, nor am I willing to be identified thus by anyone else. I identify as a woman.

Be whoever you want to be, but do not try to do so by taking something away from women - a group who have, throughout history, come second to men, and are now, apparently, expected to come last after every other gender and definition.

Report
0dfod · 17/12/2016 15:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Godstopper · 17/12/2016 15:27

I am a female.

As a gay woman, I am supposed to be on-board with the expression cis-gender. I am not.

There is no 'match' between my sex and gender since gender is a social construct. I sometimes wear dresses (does this mean that my gender is female?) and also like fixing things (does this mean that my gender is male?). It is absurd. There is no-mismatch at any level: I am simply a woman, a full-fledged biological woman.

It is very strange how the expression cis-male is rarely used.

As for that National Geographic cover, it is all kinds of misogynist. Where is the 'Female'? It is o.k to simply have a 'Male', but we must be qualified as 'cis' to appease MEN who are trying to invade our space.

Report
DameDeDoubtance · 17/12/2016 15:29

Does that make my actual cat a cis cat, or a cat cat? What about if he is online, how should he describe himself? I don't even know if he feels like a cat. What does a cat feel like? Apart from fluffy of course.

Report
TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 17/12/2016 15:31

It's utterly ridiculous. There can be as many what they call genders as they want, it doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of human beings come in two sexes, male and female, one of which can usually bear children and one which produces sperm, and are oppressed or privileged accordingly. Now, in whose interest might it be to distract from this fact and make it hard to talk about...?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.