I just want opinions here.
Do you think it is right that for a person to be convicted of sexual assault, the jury have to be sure 'beyond all reasonable doubt'? Or should it be changed to 'on the balance of probability'?
I ask because these crimes are notoriously hard to prove beyond all reasonable doubt because there are virtually never any witnesses.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex & gender discussions
Conviction of sex crimes
23 replies
keepingmum121 · 03/06/2015 22:46
OP posts:
TheBlackRider ·
04/06/2015 21:50
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
TheBlackRider ·
05/06/2015 11:50
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
TheBlackRider ·
05/06/2015 12:46
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
TheBlackRider ·
06/06/2015 09:25
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
TheBlackRider ·
06/06/2015 10:37
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.