My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

2 brothers in Telford convoked of rape and chile prosititution, according to the lawyer "this type of rape is not like other horrible types of rapes".

20 replies

reddwarf · 06/10/2012 06:58

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-19850954


Tayyab Khan, defending Ahdel Ali, urged the judge to be lenient because "this type of rape is not like other horrible types of rapes".

Right so raping 13 year old girls, protistuting and trafficking them isn't "horrible".

And this is the so called educated lawyer, never mind the sick bastards who actually did it.

OP posts:
Report
DilysPrice · 06/10/2012 07:18

To be fair (and it sticks in my throat) somebody has to defend these bastards, so arguing the toss about how bad their crime is is the defence barrister's job. It's the judges who have to steer away from this crap - the only uncrossable line for the defence is to not harrass or vilify the accuser.

Report
WofflingOn · 06/10/2012 07:32

Agreed, it is horrible and vile and unacceptable at any level. Rape is rape.
But I knew you'd either be quoting a defence lawyer or a friend/relative of the accused before I clicked on the thread.
Not a neutral opinion.

Report
OwedToAutumn · 06/10/2012 07:35

I'm pleased to see the legal system taking this kind of crime seriously.

Hopefully, the terrible attitudes of police and social workers in the recent Yorkshire case were a one off.

Report
Uppercut · 06/10/2012 10:16

With specific regard to sexual relations with the 13 year old girl, the lawyers point was that she consented and was not forced. Of course at that age, legally speaking, there is no difference, regardless of the actual nature of the relationship. I presume this was the reason for the judge's slap-down.

WofflingOn
"Rape is rape."

Debra Lafave is probably very glad that simply isn't true.

Report
AbigailAdams · 06/10/2012 16:16

Uppercut your insinuations are vile.

Report
UnChartered · 06/10/2012 16:20

Uppercut

that is a despicable thing to say

Report
Uppercut · 06/10/2012 18:26


Feel free to explain why anything I've said is incorrect.
Report
WofflingOn · 06/10/2012 18:44

Uppercut, I agree that Debra Lafave was a sexual predator who groomed and had sex with a child of 14. She should have been jailed, as a man would have been for the same act with a female child.
But that was the States, and in law in England the crime of rape can only be committed by a man with a penis.

Report
AbigailAdams · 06/10/2012 18:45

The actual nature of the relationship is one of rapist and victim, Uppercut. That is what is "incorrect".

Report
WofflingOn · 06/10/2012 18:47

The crimes of the men are different to the crime of LaFave, covering trafficking and prostitution of four girls as well as sex with a minor, so there is no real comparison possible.

Report
HotheadPaisan · 06/10/2012 18:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

WofflingOn · 06/10/2012 18:48

I would say rapist and victim was the relationship between Lafave and the boy in question, whether he was willing or not.

Report
UnChartered · 06/10/2012 18:52

i think your reference to Wofflings statement 'Rape is Rape', then using Debra Lafave as example and then stating it 'simply isn't true' is misleading and inflammatory

like PP has stated, these men raped. they are rapists.

there are no degrees of rape.

Report
LastMangoInParis · 06/10/2012 18:54

What Dilys said.
If you want to be horrified, saddened and look on in appalled, nauseated disbelief at some really ugly, misogynistic rape myth bullshit coming from the mouths of people intelligent and educated enough to know very much better then go and listen to defence counsel for sex offenders in any English court.
Although, of course, these barristers are 'just doing their job.' Hmm Sad Angry

Report
Uppercut · 06/10/2012 19:18

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

HotheadPaisan · 06/10/2012 19:22

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

UnChartered · 06/10/2012 19:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

Uppercut · 06/10/2012 19:31

I'll take it by that you can't argue against my point.

As for 'striking' I wonder what MN's position is on falsely accusing people of supporting child abusers.

Report
AbigailAdams · 06/10/2012 19:47

We are not discussing a 16yr old having sex with a 13 yr old. We are discussing adult men raping children. Or at least some of us were. Others are trying to muddy the waters and derail.

Report
AbigailAdams · 06/10/2012 19:59

And although you didn't say 'I support abusers' specifically, you did insinuate that the only thing wrong with having sex with a 13 yr old was the fact it was illegal. Which is vile.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.