| Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 11 messages.)
This is a Premium feature
To use this feature subscribe to Mumsnet Premium - get first access to new features see fewer ads, and support Mumsnet.
Start using Mumsnet Premium'satisfying' novel endings - hence SPOILERS
(11 Posts)Could do, not good do. Argh - tired! 
Gatsby does end well, though it is not a novel I can ever love.
The Great Gatsby.
I don't even know why. It left me feeling sort of emotionally empty which I thought was good given the behaviour of the characters.
And that line. It's one of my favourite literary quotes.
Stephen King's 'Dark Tower' series. It isn't a 'happy' ending, but I think it probably ends in the only way that it really good do (although I still sort of wish it didn't!).
Austen's 'Persuasion' - practically perfect in every way.
Steinbeck's 'Of Mice and Men' - no surprises, even on the first read, but it still upsets me (and I have read it many, many times!). It's the perfect ending for what I consider to be a really very, very good novel.
There are lots more but here's my first thoughts!
Yes, I liked the ending of Daughter. It made such a change from the usual harrowing finish.
I liked the ending of Jane Shemilt's "Daughter". I kind of saw it coming but it really made me think about how I would respond as a mother in the same situation. Very well done.
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
NOS4R2 By Joe Hill. Manages to kill off a VIP character and have a happy ending, beautifully done.
Oh, interesting. Quite timely, too, as I've just been listening on the radio to that new biography of Charlotte Bronte, and it talks about Villette.
I think I agree about Villette. It kind of depends on whether you think a "good" ending is one where all the loose ends are tied up. I know people hate the ending of "Her", but I quite liked it.
Engleby by Sebastian Faulks is one that was well done, I thought.
Also, although they're kids' books, the Harry Potter books, both each one individually and the final chapter of the last book that tied up the whole thing.
In The Woods was terrible and its ending gave me the rage. You kind of find out who did it, but it's implausible and frankly by then you just don't care.
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
This came up on another thread about unsatisfying whodunnit endings which I didn't want to hi-jack entirely.
Endings tend to be one of the most attacked elements of any novel in Amazon reviews, with people very often describing ones they didn't like as 'unsatisfying'. Maybe because it's the last thing you read, by definition, and/or because it's an easier thing to say 'the ending was crap' than to analyse why the characterisation was inconsistent or the structure didn't work.
So can I ask people to nominate a novel in any genre that has an ending they do consider 'satisfying' and to say why?
I'll start, and with a novel whose ending I've often seen described as a 'cop out' - Charlotte Bronte's Villette.
I think this is a brilliantly-handled ending. Given that, presumably, all readers who have read as far as this do actually want Lucy (prickly, reserved and difficult as she is as a narrator and character) to find happiness with the man who genuinely loves her - but is hauled off overseas for several years before they can marry by an exaggerated sense of duty to the family of his long-dead fiancée - I think CB pulls off something very difficult, hinting at Paul's death at sea in gorgeous, veiled, poetic language, but not actually saying so - flicking decades forward to when her first person narrator is an old woman looking back on her life running a school, but also staying stubbornly in the moment before Lucy knows whether Paul is dead or alive, where 'sunny imaginations' can still hope.
We know CB never planned to have them marry and that she only veiled Pau's death to please her elderly father, who was upset by it, but for me the ending works because it's so thoroughly in tune with Lucy's character - she's always kept huge, important chunks of plot to herself (what actually happened to her family, that she recognises Graham Bretton etc), so the ending is only another version of a perversely reserved narrator - only here it's to spare the reader's supposed feelings.
So I think that for an ending which 'disappoints' the reader by not allowing a romantic ending, it still satisfies us. If that makes sense at all?
| Start new thread in this topic | Watch this thread | Flip this thread | Refresh the display |
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 11 messages.)
Join the discussion
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.
Join MumsnetAlready have a Mumsnet account? Log in