My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Whether you're a permanent teacher, supply teacher or student teacher, you'll find others in the same situation on our Staffroom forum.

The staffroom

Inset - didn't it, historically come out of teacher's leave?

46 replies

GeorgianMumto5 · 14/05/2013 10:56

Please can you clarify that for me? Elsewhere on the Internet I have waded into an argument about pupil absence for term-time holidays being OK because teachers make them absent when they have inset/polling days or strike.

If there's comeback, I'd like to get my facts right, re. Inset. Yes, I know I was stupid to wade in, but there it all was, glistening with factual inaccuracies and it got my goat.

Thank you.

OP posts:
Report
RustyBear · 14/05/2013 11:00

Yes, inset days came out of teachers' holidays. And teachers have no say in whether or not a school is used as a polling station.

Report
GeorgianMumto5 · 14/05/2013 11:09

Thanks! Did one of the school holidays get shorter?

OP posts:
Report
maddy68 · 14/05/2013 17:41

Yes school holidays are now 5 days shorter than they used to be

Report
ParkerTheThief · 14/05/2013 17:52

Yes, they were originally called Baker Days introduced by Kenneth Baker in 1988

Report
soapboxqueen · 14/05/2013 19:18

Yes. As pp said teacher training days came out of holidays and were known as baker days. Children do not loose a day of education for polling days. Most schools hold a training day which other schools hold at another time during the year. They still get their 190 days.

Report
Hulababy · 14/05/2013 19:22

Children still have the same number of school holidays that they used to have. The difference is that the children now have 5 days called INSET rather than holidays, and they can be placed at different times throughout the school year.

Teachers lost 5 days of their holidays.

Days lost due to polling stations are out of the control of the teachers. They are not relevant.

Strike days - well taking strike action is a right for (almost) all workers in the UK. If teachers were no longer allowed to strike, then that rule should also be rolled out across the whole work force. No one is allowed to take strike action. TBH I am not sure how many people would vote for that.

Report
GeorgianMumto5 · 14/05/2013 23:32

Thanks everyone!

OP posts:
Report
caroldecker · 15/05/2013 00:18

No strike action gets my vote

Report
GeorgianMumto5 · 15/05/2013 14:26

I've not had to weigh in lately, but I did hold my tongue at one contribution to the argument, which was, 'In Sweden and [several other countries] they don't start school until six.'

Right, so emigrate and then go on holiday!

*sigh. I'm actually all for being able to take term time holidays, if only I could, but I'm not all for people thinking it is their right and that they can back up their decisions with dumbass arguments.

OP posts:
Report
cardibach · 19/05/2013 21:56

caroldecker really? No power for workers to defend their rights?
OP others have answered your question, they are correct.

Report
cardibach · 19/05/2013 21:59

caroldecker really? No power for workers to defend their rights?
OP others have answered your question, they are correct.

Report
caroldecker · 20/05/2013 00:40

workers can defend their rights - when they demonstrate their responsibilities. When 30% fail to get a c in maths GCSE after 11 years teaching, the teaching 'profession' has failed. Workers who cannot do their jobs have no right to strike.

Report
Hulababy · 20/05/2013 12:57

So you're happy for ALL workers in ALL professions to have no right to action?

And you do know that there will always be a certain number of children that are just not able to pass maths at a C level, or any subject either. A grade C is not a fail. A U grade is a fail. A C is the expected but it can never be everyone who can pass it for all manner of reasons. You are also assuming that the only people who have a bearing on a child's ability to get a specific grade are teachers, and that the only place that has a bearing in a child's ability is school. This, obviously, is not the case.

Report
caroldecker · 20/05/2013 18:46

My view is that people should have a right to action when they have upheld their side of the work contract.
I do not believe that teachers as a group have achieved that, even if individual teachers may have.

Report
cornypedicure · 20/05/2013 19:37

what part of the contract is that then caroldecker?

Report
YoniConnect · 20/05/2013 19:46

At the risk of a flaming, surely the creation of Inset (baker) days was so long ago (1988 - 25 years) that it is now not relevant to refer to them as "lost holidays". Workers in many sectors have had their rights / working conditions changed in the intervening years, ( Sunday trading / bank holiday opening for shop workers / loss of final salary pension schemes pretty much across the board in the private sector) so let's just get used to a teacher's working year of 195 days now!

Report
caroldecker · 20/05/2013 21:49

The bit where they teach children to read, write and add up.

1 in 6 adults has lower than an eleven year old reading level

78% lower than c grade GCSE maths

Report
LindyHemming · 20/05/2013 22:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

caroldecker · 20/05/2013 22:26

Well I thought it was a teacher's job. They have the children for around 25 hours a week, 30 weeks a year for 11 years - over 8,000 hours and the basics - reading, writing and adding up should come into it somewhere.
Or maybe I misunderstand what teachers are supposed to do?

Report
LindyHemming · 20/05/2013 23:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

caroldecker · 21/05/2013 01:18

No problem with teachers personally - all the ones I have come across have enabled those I know to add up. I just cannot see how you justify a profession which results in 78% of people not managing a grade c in GCSE maths and c.18% of people cannot read as doing their job. I accept not 100%, but 22% a success rate!

sample grade c questions, 8,000 hours, about 12% of a lifetime at school and 78% cannot answer these!

Report
mnistooaddictive · 21/05/2013 01:45

Carol have you ever heard of the normal distribution? It is how most things in nature are arranged. Things such as length of caterpillars and number of leaves in a tree etc. most people are clustered around the middle andcthe further you get from the mean the fewer there are. Exam results follow this too. A grade C at GCSE may mean nothing to you but to students who are at the bottom of the normal curve it is really really difficult. They can work really hard and have excellent teaching but find concepts beyond them. There are then those with learning difficulties and behaviour difficulties and mental health issues and the most horrific personal circumstances that all affect their ability to work at school.
Also I don't know where you get your statistics but where I looked it is 40% ish who don't get a grade C at GCSE.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

RustyBear · 21/05/2013 07:25

The BIS survey caroldecker quoted doesn't show achievement at GCSE, it is a survey, carried out in 2011, of the Maths skills of the adult population, with an age range of 16-65.

Report
Hulababy · 21/05/2013 07:34

78% of people don't achieve grade C or above in GCSE Maths?
Where does that stat come from?

Report
nkf · 21/05/2013 07:40

Grade c in maths is a lot more than adding up. Grade c in English is a lot more than reading or writing.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.