My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

The royal family

Is there a presedent for a serving Monarch having weekly meetings with a PM accused of beastality

4 replies

FootprintsOnMarble · 23/09/2015 23:23

I voted for Cameron. The idea of forcing the Queen, who has never put a foot wrong in decades, to be constitutionally compelled to regularly meet a man who looked like his parents were a space hopper and Mr Soft (Millaband) seemed a cruel think to do. However, like the vast majority of the electorate I simply had no idea that Dave was carnally familiar with pigs and had submitted to an orgasmic state within one so as to comply with some nightmarish initiation requirement of some decidedly shady exclusive and nonsensical Oxford society. I don't know which is more harrowing- that he ejaculated within the severed head of a non-human or that he did it with OTHER PEOPLE IN THE ROOM. One imagines there was probably cheering. the horror, the horror. So now, in her autumn years, our Monarch, whose knees have never buckled and whose gripes never been voiced has to meet a man who has indulged in cum qua fornicati sunt porcum. Oh and he is related to her too. That must be quite awkward. I nearly wished Id voted Lib Dem. Nearly.

OP posts:
QueenLaBeefah · 23/09/2015 23:30

She's married to prince Phillip so I would imagine she is quite broad minded.

GiddyOnZackHunt · 23/09/2015 23:33

Well I'm sure the rumours about Ted Heath aren't true but somehow a dead pig don't compare with a live child. I guess the Queen doesn't chat about sexual proclivities and respects the democratic process.

LimpidPools · 23/09/2015 23:35

Did you enjoy writing that op?

Frankly, I wish shagging a pig's head was the worst of his crimes.

squidzin · 23/09/2015 23:36

The whole Monarchy Oxbridge Westminster Windsor incestuous power paradigm has got to stop.

Regardless of who fucked who's pig.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.