My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

If you're worried about your pet's health, please speak to a vet or qualified professional.

The doghouse

Not taking out pet insurance...

109 replies

HolaWeenie · 13/02/2018 21:37

We collect our dog in 2 days, I've spent quite a lot of time looking at insurance policies. It seems a total swizz!

Ideally we would like a lifetime policy with around £2-3k per illness, no annual policy limit and around £100 -200 excess. That looks to be available for around £15-20 per month, which will increase each year. As I understand it with lifetime policies you're unable to shop around like car insurance as it's based on you renewing, so by the time dog is 6yrs old we could be paying quite a lot more each month.

We have low risk lives, fairly sensible kids for their ages and I'm at home all the time. I plan to train the dog well. He's a toy breed so will be on lead most of the time. So whilst you can't foresee accidents, I think we're quite low risk.

We'd cover vaccinations and neutering and small things, just like we do with our house and car insurance, we don't claim for small things. So the insurance would be for big things that run into the thousands. The policy will then be capped at £2/3k anyway, so we will be exposed for amounts above that.

We do have credit available to us if something should happen, so my question is are we nuts to consider not taking out insurance!?

OP posts:
Report
DancesWithOtters · 13/02/2018 21:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DancesWithOtters · 13/02/2018 21:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Justmuddlingalong · 13/02/2018 21:45

Yes, I think you are. A low risk family has no bearing whatsoever on the potential health of your dog.

Report
Bluntness100 · 13/02/2018 21:45

Get insurance, you have not accounted for your dog being ill.

My dog got ill, he was at the vets constantly, overnight stays, barium balls, medication, you name it, the cost was in excess of 4K per annum

Before he was sadly put to sleep my final bill was 3k. Sadly we had not noticed in the renewal that pet plan had with drawn cover for this illness. So it was our expense. However it was irrelevant, what are you going to do, say you can't afford it and put your dog to sleep?

Being careful or training the dog is irrelevant. Dogs like humans get sick. Ours had a diseased bowel. There was no way to prevent it.

I would not do a lifetime policy no. Pet plan ultimately covered about 8k of costs before they said no more. The final year our dog cost in the region of 7k all in.

My friends dog has an illness that requires medication which is hugely expensive. As in hundreds a month,Now the insurer has pulled out, and yes she has to make a decision as she can't afford it. However if she had no insurance, or a lifetime policy that decision would have been one that came much quicker.

Honestly get insured and not a lifetime policy. This is not like house or car insurance.

Report
HolaWeenie · 13/02/2018 21:46

I have said to dh let's at least do it for the first year and then make a decision at the end of the year. The more he reads about it the more he thinks we should cover any potential bills ourselves.

OP posts:
Report
Bluntness100 · 13/02/2018 21:48

You're both nuts. That's all I can say. Or you're incredibly wealthy.

Report
twinkletoedelephant · 13/02/2018 21:48

Ddog decided one day to launch herself at a minibus.... Without insurance it would have been ££££ thankfully we had insurance she had the best care and cost us £85. She sleeping on my feet now.

If we had to have found Over £1000+ .... She wouldn't be.

Report
Bluntness100 · 13/02/2018 21:50

And it's twenty or thirty odd quid a month. If you can't afford it you should not have a dog. They can be very expensive.

Report
DancesWithOtters · 13/02/2018 21:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bigsighall · 13/02/2018 21:52

I’m not a big believer in pet insurance but I always insure for the first year minimum (apparently insuring for the first year and then after 7 is the most beneficial way of doing it but I’ve never insured an adult dog)

Report
Hoddykins · 13/02/2018 21:53

My bailey - young, healthy 5 year old Beagle - we discovered a lump and he went lame in both legs all at once.

We are already over our £7,000 cover for this year and having to save for another £3,800 operation.

Please please please get insurance - and the highest amount possible!!!

We wish we had rather than going for the middle option!

Report
ElanorGamgee · 13/02/2018 21:53

We don’t insure anything pet wise, two horses, three cats and a dog. Sadly they are all elderly now. Worst year in the last twenty probably cost us £5k in vets fees, most years we only pay for vaccinations and a health check.

I would have spent far more than the £10k max I have spent on illnesses had I insured for the last 20 years.

I have a fairly pragmatic approach though, wouldn’t go for invasive treatments generally whether insured or not. Wouldn’t put a horse through colic surgery for instance as the recovery can be very hard and not something either of mine would cope with terribly well. Would struggle to put a small animal through cancer surgery unless the odds of a full recovery were above 90%, etc., etc.

Report
MsHomeSlice · 13/02/2018 21:55

admittedly drug costings will be lower for a toydog, but anything out of the ordinary...a couple of xrays, sedation, vet time, vet hospital, meds, follow ups...that's £500 gone minimum


If I had a £5k cushion then I probably would not bother, but unless you have that waiting then you are trusting to luck.
If you are happy to have to get the dog euthanised rather than investigate an illness to see if it is treatable then crack on.

Report
Bluntness100 · 13/02/2018 21:56

My dog was sick from the age of three to five, so three years in total before he had to be PTS. Honestly, get insured, they become like members of your family and having to put your animal to sleep because you cannot afford the vets bills and didn't insure would be beyond devastating,

It's bad enough when you lose them but to have to do it because you can't afford the vets fees and you didn't insure must be a million times worse.

Report
HolaWeenie · 13/02/2018 21:59

I mentioned our fairly low risk lives with regards to the likelihood of accidents, broken bones etc.

I totally understand it will be illness that would be the thing to run into the thousands, and there is absolutely no way we would be able to avoid that, which is why I find it a swizz, they cap policies! So we would still be left exposed for hefty bills regardless of having insurance.

Don't get me wrong I want insurance. I'm keen to hear your views to convince dh.

OP posts:
Report
mustbemad17 · 13/02/2018 21:59

My dog cost me £2.5k in the first six months we had her. No insurance. A friend had to stop her dog's chemo because she couldn't afford the £350 a time bill.

There are things you can do to reduce risk - training etc. But you can't guarantee your dog won't get hit by a car, get a lifelong health issue, require emergency surgery for something. Unless you have a couple of grand at least in the bank i think you'd be daft not to insure

Report
Justmuddlingalong · 13/02/2018 22:01

Your dog might be on a lead, what about the other dogs who aren't?

Report
mustbemad17 · 13/02/2018 22:04

There's also genetics. My mum's spaniel has some weird thing with her ears that required a vet to put together a special vaccine for her - it was pretty cool how they did it - but it cost £1500 a jab. She needed four. She now needs special medicated food for life which costs a bomb - because its part of the condition the insurance covers a large percentage of her food. Saves my folks about £100 every three months even paying the excess

Report
Regularsizedrudy · 13/02/2018 22:04

Insurance is part of being a responsible pet owner. You shouldn’t be getting a dog if you can’t handle paying £20 a month.

Report
expatinscotland · 13/02/2018 22:05

We just lost our very elderly house cat. He had a stroke at home and even taking him to the vet who discovered this and having to have him PTS was £300. We're petless now, but the only pet I'd have and not and not have insurance for is a hamster.

Report
blueskyinmarch · 13/02/2018 22:05

We are a low risk family. But our family dog has a health condition which needs an op. The insurance has paid for x rays, a CT scan and will pay for her OP and any follow ups. I would not have a dog and not have insurance.

Report
scattyhattie · 13/02/2018 22:06

Well £2-3k isn't likely to be enough cover per year let alone capped for lifetime, I'd say £7k per year renewing pot, lifetime policy is now minimum tbh.
An MRI is minimum £1k and that's just diagnostic not treatment, my lad needed 2 MRI's in a year for different conditions and insurance paid out £7k in total over 18months till then had 5yrs with no claims. Saw wide range of breeds/sizes at orthopedic specialist vets.

Medication & managing long term conditions can get very expensive, but pet could still have a good quality of life on them. Insurance is always a gamble but I try to think how much it would cost to borrow the money to pay vets & could then easily get hit with another big bill later on.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

expatinscotland · 13/02/2018 22:06

There's an adorable cat available on SSPCA site now, but sadly he's got a heart condition. It'd be impossible to insure him and you'd have to be quite well off to take him on Sad.

Report
LRL2017 · 13/02/2018 22:06

We had a £2,500 operation and around £4,500 for a number of problems too. We would never have afforded this without insurance. I wouldn't risk it.

Report
mustbemad17 · 13/02/2018 22:07

expat do SSPCA not cover existing conditions as serious as that? I know the RSPCA sometimes does

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.