The BBC should be ashamed of itself for 'Trust me I'm a vet'. First off when you think, totally objectively, what must be the very best food for your dog? A highly processed diet? Or a fresh food diet? Is there anything intrinsically unique about our dogs that means their food has to be blasted at incinerator high temperatures that removes all the goodness, bad and good bacteria, destroys vitamins, and then has to have a load of artificial vitamins and amino acids added back in together with dye and spray blasted fat to add artificial flavour as all natural flavour has been removed? I think not. So, I go to my vet to check my research and ask for advice about how to feed fresh food to my dog. He/she/they don't know. Although interestingly I am told to feed my large breed puppy a 'high calcium' food. Something which a small amount of research will tell you is a dangerous error. (As purina have found in research, resulting in deformed dogs with severe joint issues). They can though, point me to 'large breed puppy food' that happens to be lining the shelves in the waiting room. Mmmmm.
So, why does food need to be processed before it is healthy and balanced. It doesn't. The first episode of trust me I'm a vet found that most processed dog foods are not balanced and could lead to health issues. What does it advise? Using different brands in the hope that the inbalances will cancel each other out. What! How mad is that? No, just tell people what dogs need for a balanced diet. Don't make out it's all this big mystery which only the huge multinational companies who own the money spinning dog food companies can possibly know how to do properly!
People say to me 'why do you feed raw'. My response is 'why do you feed highly processed kibble?' Are you giving your dog the best by giving - corn, beet, chicken meal, soya, pea protein, and in some cases artificial colours and flavours. Or are you giving the best by giving fresh meat, and veg? The scientists who do the research paid for by the dog food multinationals say there is no scientific evidence that raw is healthier. Well, 2 things, there is research, (NZ study recently reported), but honestly, do you NEED research to tell you fresh food is better than highly processed? And we are talking HIGHLY processed, worse than the sausage and bacon we have been warned about.
If you worry about bacteria, remember that there are bacteria everywhere, that there are thousands of strains of salmonella, only some dangerous, that one in 3 people carry mrsa bacteria on their skin,. Are all the people that are worried about bacteria, vegetarians? Using standard food hygiene procedures such as washing hands, wiping and disinfecting surfaces, cleaning bowls etc are quite sufficient.
I fed my pup 3 years ago on kibble, but as a mum who spends a lot of time ensuring that her vegetarian family are fed healthily, I felt increasingly uneasy at what I was giving my dog. He was uninterested in food, would go days without eating a full meal, would scratch so much that even on walks he would lie in the street to have a scratch. After much research I changed to a raw commercial food (Nutriment), joined some raw food pages, 'raw feeding advice and support', 'barf uk', 'raw feeding uk', 'rawsome and holistic', and now feed a mix of commercial raw and DIY. Dogs itching stopped within 2 weeks, he was crazy for his new food, and more focussed in training. I adopted another dog and swapped her to raw immediately. She grew a shiny new topcoat. Both are healthy dogs with shiny coats and, I believe, good immunity. I would never feed anything else.