The way the art module of the Classics A level is conceived it is like a form of torture. My daughter did it a few years ago, and although she was an A* student in everything else, and even had the help of having already studied art and art history, she could not get her head around it. It's all based on one (very dated, rather pedestrian) book, Susan Woodford. You read the book, and learn hundreds of dates and the names of ancient Greek vases. It should be fun, but the way it's approached is unfullfilling, rather meaningless, and dry as dust).
We tried to persuade my DS not to do it, but he wanted to study Classics to do the texts, which he loves. Now, even though he's got A*s in course works about Virgil/Homer etc., he finds he can scarcely even write a sentence comparing the temples and vases. In other words, it's not like he doesn't work hard, but this module is overwhelming. He's now seriously depressed, and believes he's a total idiot, and says he won't go to university, because he is so obviously 'stupid'. He's stopped going to school, and will probably now flunk all his other GCEs as a result.
Does anyone have any advice? Please? (!)
Be warned. Whoever does this module needs to be armed to the teeth against pure boredom, and also needs to be able to employ the vocabulary and sensibility of a 40-year old art critic. It is just beyond the development stage of most 17-18 year olds.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Parenting teenagers has its ups and downs. Get advice from Mumsnetters here.
Teenagers
Classics GCE - hate and the Art and Architecture model
1 reply
GaynorA · 08/04/2013 12:28
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.