This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 20 messages.)
Whether you’re a beauty novice or a confirmed fashionista, this topic is for consulting Mumsnetters on all things style-related. Plus, check out our Swears By page for the inside track on the next Mumsnet must-have.
Plus size model doesn't equate to plus size human being, why do we make these extrapolations? We wouldn't moan if she was referred to as plus size for a high jumper, men don't look at boxers and moan about themselves therefore being heavy weight/ feather weight because they are not boxers. Model criteria is currently tall and thin (changing that is a different issue), so for a model she is plus size - that is no reason for any other woman to beat themselves up. I would be a "mammoth size" jockey, "short arsed" high jumper, "fragile, tiny" sumo wrestler - still overall a normal person of healthy size.
I think it's all about height - she might be a size 12, but that means a very different thing at say 5'11 than it does if you're 5'2" like me. Don't know how tall she is of course, but models aren't usually short!
She has a lovely figure, certainly not thin though, even for her height.
'Plus-size' models start at a size 12-14. So doesn't bear a large relation to what the high-street refer to as plus-size ie. 16+. But as someone who is busty, it's nice to see what clothing looks like on something other than a boyish figure.
lol at 'obese for a model' - do definitions of obesity (ie. a medical condition) change according to one's profession? Is she 'anorexic for a darts player' as well?
I was very cross to discover recently that models are using padding so that they can pretend to be plus-size (a 12 or 14, not talking a size 20). Why not just find someone who is the right size and shape to start with?