DS has been awarded a statement

[JJXM]

Great news! DS' statement dropped through the letterbox today. At a first glance it seems ok but needs a little bit of tightening in Part 3.

[ouryve]

Excellent!

[autumnsmum]

Fab

[Ineedmorepatience]

Brilliant

[Skylar123]

Excellent news

[trulymadlydeeplyunlikeable]

Well done!

[AttilaTheMeerkat]

Good news indeed!

You nee to ensure though that both Parts 2 and 3 of this document are bang on. You need to see provision that is both specified and quantified; anything less that this (for instance child may have access to...) must be rejected by you.

If unsure keep posting here and speak to IPSEA //www.ipsea.org.uk

[troutsprout]

Hurrah! Well done :-)

[Tambaboy]

Well done!

[coppertop]

Hurray! Well done.:)

[Levantine]

Well done!

[streakybacon]

Well done

[JJXM]

Thanks everyone . Here's hoping it starts a run of statements for all.

attila I'm arranging a meeting with the LA to discuss any amendments.

[2boysnamedR]

Well done - fx I can say this one day ( hopefully before I'm telling you ds has on holiday at a you nd offender institute )

[KOKOagainandagain]

Well done. At least not all assessments are resulting in a NIL

Is this for m/s? If so, do you mind me asking how many hours are proposed? My LA have introduced pre-statutory top-up which they use to only 'need' to make 25 + hours a week statutory. Ie DC who do not need more than 25 hours support each week don't need a statement.

[armani]

well done good luck with the meeting, if it is anything like mune was you will need it!
keep dd has a 27 hour statement and LA top up 6.5k, the school fund the first 10k.

[armani]

sorry should have added that its a ms statement.
also the statement should be provided if the child needs one rather than funding arrangements. you can get a statement that doesnt come with any additional funding from LA.

[JJXM]

We have a choice of schools but as we thought we would be fighting for the statement for months we are now having to have a serious think. The hours aren't actually specified which is why we need to have a meeting. We wouldn't need them specified at the SS because there are only six in the class with two TAs.

Fx for my SA refusal buddy 2boys - of course he won't end up in young offenders.