I am trying to organize an private professional to do an ASD diagnostic assessment of dd2. This chap has already been super helpful. He would like to observe dd2 in school, preferably in the afternoon when time is less structured, and speak to her teacher for about 30mins. This in addition to carrying out the ADOS and ADI-R.
School refused to allow an in-school observation, stating they feel they 'cannot accommodate' it.
Then the SENCO called me in to tell me she is trying to find a way round it. She explained the objections from HT, which are:
- Costs of getting a supply teacher to cover the teacher time. Apparently prohibitive, even though the SENCO has offered to talk to this professional instead (ergo the SENCO could surely stand in for the teacher for 30mins while the teacher liaised with the professional, or am I going mead?).
- Private professionals have, in the past, criticised the teaching observed and, as an LEA, Herts [stop snickering in the back row!] are trying to protect their teachers by not allowing private professionals in, as a rule. No idea if this is true of sheer fantasy.
- HT feels she could not ask teachers to liaise out of school time e.g. after school because of NUT work-to-rule union guidance.
I am interested in a straw poll of others' experiences of trying to set up similar in-school observations by private people. Is this the kind of thing everyone is up against or do I read between the lines and conclude the HT just has about as much interest in helping identify the context of my dd2's needs as I have in seeing what it's like to stick my finger in an electric mains socket?
Your experiences/thoughts, please........