I've name changed for this.
We have had no end of bother with DS' statement. It has taken months to get a S< porgramme up and running. The TA hired is useless and has no experience/qualifications but worse still doesn't seem to be particularly bothered about DS. She also has an overinflated opinion of herself.
I have complained to the LGO. I actually think that, in addition to the sessions not being set up, the TA has not been 'appropriately trained' to deliver the S< sessions as required by his statement.
LA says the definition of 'appropriately trained' is whatever the S< thinks the TA needs to deliver the sessions.
Yet, she has had no training at all. Not even an ELKLAN course. She has seen one session modelled by a S<. She has never even been a TA before.
I think they are in breach of the statement even if the sessions start until this TA is properly trained. What do you think?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.
SN children
What would you define as "appropriately trained" for a TA?
57 replies
appropriatelytrained · 04/06/2011 12:15
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.