... i'm not sure i do.
i can understand why some people have misgivings about the way that we have treated people on here, the jeering etc can't be that nice to be on the end of. otoh i feel that the schlebs are too able to skitter off the hook and treat us like dafties.
does the problem lie with MNHQ?
what are Justine etc saying to people?
are they advising them to look at MN first, or are they hopeful that they don't?
why on earth are we asked to waste our time coming up with questions that MNHQ then doesn't get them to answer?
are they even in the same room as MNHQ? cos if DG for example was just logging on from her home office (i imagine it a pale farrow and ball green, with floating shelves stuffed to the gills with byron - not tanya) then why all the 'oh she can give us a few minutes more' etc etc. why can't they just come back adn answer questions later?
and WHY do they think we're stupid?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
MNHQ have commented on this thread
Site stuff
Step forward everyone who thinks that the way webchats currently work (where the sleb ignores most of the questions and is roundly barracked for so doing) is FINE.
107 replies
AitchTwoOh · 24/06/2009 22:33
OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie ·
24/06/2009 22:52
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn
StarlightMcKenzie ·
24/06/2009 23:09
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.