Advanced search

New Defamation Act (or, congrats to Justine)

(12 Posts)
MooncupGoddess Fri 26-Apr-13 16:56:12

Following much hard work and campaigning, in which our dear ceo was heavily involved, the Defamation Bill has been passed. This significantly improves Britain's antiquated legal framework surrounding libel issues, and means that MN will no longer face collapse when I post my hilarious new Gina Ford joke in Chat.

HelenMumsnet (MNHQ) Fri 26-Apr-13 17:01:11

Yay! grin <slight wibble about SWMNBN>

CabbageLooking Fri 26-Apr-13 17:03:01

Hurray! Who else can we now be really rude about? (And what is SWMNBN?)

TheDoctrineOfSnatch Fri 26-Apr-13 17:08:43

She Who Must Not Be Named (aka GF)

TheDoctrineOfSnatch Fri 26-Apr-13 17:09:02

I don't know what SIOB is though. Anyone?

HelenMumsnet (MNHQ) Fri 26-Apr-13 17:11:40


I don't know what SIOB is though. Anyone?

Sharp intake of breath. Often associated with SWMNBN...

MooncupGoddess Fri 26-Apr-13 17:16:08

Don't worry Helen, it was just a joke. Anyway I'm going to have much more fun going after Russian oligarchs.

Tee2072 Fri 26-Apr-13 17:18:38

Whoot! Well done team!

JustineMumsnet (MNHQ) Fri 26-Apr-13 17:43:43

Well that's mighty kind of you folks - it was very much a team effort - both our end (Rowan's been to an awful lot of meetings) and of course with all the other organisations involved - Sense about Science, PEN, Index on Censorship to name a few. But it does feel nice to have a new law finally after being involved in the campaign for so long smile.

We don't, by the way, know every detail yet but the broad principle is one that the author is responsible for what they write. So when a complainant re libel contacts us we will have a few days to contact the poster and ask him/her whether they wish to stand by the post or remove it. If they wish to stand by it then the legal responsibility for it will become theirs. Right now we just tend to remove posts whenever we are contacted (because we can't be sure of the facts).

The other significant thing is that companies have to be able to prove serious financial harm to bring a case.

So broadly I think it's good for freedom of speech.

mrscumberbatch Fri 26-Apr-13 17:45:31

Congratulations. That's a huge thing to have achieved.

Fancy running for PM?

TheDoctrineOfSnatch Fri 26-Apr-13 17:55:07

Sounds ace!

Pan Fri 26-Apr-13 18:00:38

Sounds utterly sensible and quite a victory! And I'm sure it works both ways and mixes in with post-Leveson stuff?

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: