We're becoming a nation of only children: do you agree? And have a butcher's at our guest blog, too(140 Posts)
There's an article in The Telegraph today saying that we're becoming a nation of only children, with almost half of all parents having just one child.
The Telegraph article suggests that many parents are "stopping at one" largely because of the mounting cost of bringing up children.
Do you think this is true?
If you're a parent, do you only have one child? If so, is that by choice or not? And if it was by choice, how big a part did your family finances play in that choice?
And what are the implications, if any, of a generation of onlies who've had no siblings to
squabble play with?
MNHQ STOP PRESS: In a guest blog today, MN blogger and mother of one Stephanie Pomfrett (who blogs over here) writes about her decision to be a one-child family - and why she won't be adding a sibling to the mix.
Do read what she has to say, too - and post your comments here or over on our Bloggers thread.
Surprised to hear that one-child families are so common.
I know far more families with two or more children than I do families with only children.
Although, having said that, 19 month old DS is an only child at the moment. All being well, he'll be part of a two child family in another 6 months or so. There may be many more families where the only child isn't going to remain an only child.
At nursery most of DD's peers were onlies until they left for school (we've all gone separate ways, so they may or may not have had another child since).
At our school DD's Y1 class have a high proportion of onlies. Of 28 pupils, 11 have no siblings and 2 have a half-sibling (in both cases same mother but different fathers). Only 3 of those with siblings have more than one.
When I was at school the vast majority of my peers had one sibling.
When does a family officially become a 'one-child family'? When the mother reaches menopause?
So many people (like us) have one not knowing if they're going to have a second... then there are combined and blended families, step-siblings, new partners, half siblings etc. etc.
This is the article about the only child myth and the idiot who came up with it. Leatheralley you might find it an interesting counterpoint to your 'sources'
which we're all still waiting for
And linked within that article is a gallery of famous onlies. It also includes Lance Armstrong but it's from a few years ago I guess. Interesting as well that it comments on the spike in onlies after the Depression in America, adding to the fact that there have always been periods when there have been increases in the number of onlies.
One final link from me: this article about a threatened school shooting a few weeks ago in the US gives an interesting perspective about just how quick people and the media can be to assign negative characteristics to a lack of siblings.
I only have one DD, through choice, by a forced choice for medical reasons. I suffered from severe SPD when I had DD and could barely walk for the last two months of pregnancy. I was in agony all the time, on crutches and hardly left the house. Then I had an awful back to back labour, on a drip, epidural wore off....
The consultant himself told me to think very very carefully before having any more children as he didn't think that my body would cope with it. I was 36 years old, overweight and inclined to agree with him, as was my then H (now XH).
I didnt even know if I would have kids, due to endometriosis, so see my 1 DD as a blessing.
She has lovely friends nearby and family of a similar age (cousins children and XH's great newphes/nieces). I have one brother, but we didnt always get on.
I make sure that I spend plenty of time playing with her and she has such a fantastic imagination, that she happily spends hours playing on her own with her toys.
Financially, we would have struggled to have 2. I live in a 2 bed place, so if we had a boy, would have needed another bedroom eventually.
My XH walked out last year when DD was 4yo, so I now make sure that I spend a lot of time with her, giving her cuddles etc.
I don't think that anybody should be criticised for having just 1 child.
Haven't read all of the thread yet, or links posted, but to add my situation: one DS, turned 13 this week. His best friend since Reception is an only. Two other boys he has known since Reception are onlys. The planned two children has become one, who is wonderful.
cost is not the reason my friends with onechild have one child. i have two and sometimes daydream about how much easier it would be if i also just had one.
yes but it would also be easier with a full time nanny - wonder how many people who allegedly only have one because it's easier would feel differently if an extra 40k a year was in the mix.
I didn't...no 'allegedly' about it for me, I wanted one, I stoped at one. Through various career changes DH and I probably had not far off that extra available to us before DS started school, never crossed my mind that we ought to therefore have another.
Also - the 'allegedly' leaves me a bit ; is it so hard to believe that maybe some people might just decide to have one and be happy with it? Do you honestly think that all those of us saying we wanted one are kidding ourselves? Staggering though it may seem in the face of the kind of rudeness that is doled out to parents of onlies fairly frequently (and not just on MN but in RL too) we're not all deluded and lying to save face about the choices we make.
My son is quite clearly fucked.
I am old
He's a boy
He's an only child
Or...perhaps he will be just fine and perhaps he won't turn into some kind of Norman Bates character. I think the most offensive thing I have read on this thread is the idea that a close relationship with a parent, and in particular a mother, is somehow going to psychologically damage a child. Projecting much?
Plus, I really do believe that you're either a pushy send your child(Ren) to every class going kind of parent or you're not. Having one child doesn't mean you push them to over achieve. Some of us just want to send our child(ren) on their way as decent enough human beings who can fend for themselves and live an independent and happy life.
agree df. i am a real 'let him be' kind of parent. the idea that because he's an only i'll over push him is bizarre to me. i'd be more inclined to be using every class and extra known to man if i had more than one rather than hear them bickering at home.
whilst i say given enough money i'd risk having another child i am actually pretty happy with one and that child would be a bit.... well not less wanted but... hard to explain but i suspect some other mum's of onlies would know what i mean.
i'm not sure i could love that much and that consumingly again. a second child would get a lot less from me i think and i know that i got a lot less as a second child.
DF, agree too - being pushy would never work with DS - he would be completely miserable.
Actually, we went down the adoption route when he was about 9/10 - after a year they (sw) put everything on hold, apparently ds's SpLD would be a problem (literacy/processing difficulties) - even though they never even met ds, who is in mainstream school; we were angry but looking back it was for the best and we had to go through the process to realise it wasn't right for us or DS, who actually said without any prompting that he didn't want a brother or sister any more.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.