My DCs school has just brought in compulsory lanyards (different colours for different years), which are attached to their lunch card (which has photo ID, although very faded).
I can understand the sense of being able to see at a glance which year any DC is, but what is surprising me is that they have also brought in that if a DC forgets their lanyard, they are to be internally excluded until a parent arrives with it (which if parents work, may well not be possible).
I gather that one parent got around the internal exclusion by paying for a new lanyard and lunch card on Parent Pay. In the past if a DC lost their lunch card, it took a couple of days for it to be produced after payment was made, but maybe they have speeded up the system to make same day provision possible.
DD was initially very scared by the very heavy handed way it was announced in assembly (she is generally nervous about this sort of thing- a former primary school teacher once said of her "the other children tried to teach her to be naughty, but she wasn't having any of it", but she can be forgetful), however apparently other kids in her class have suggested to her that this might be the way to get out of classes one hates (there are indeed classes that DD particularly loathes), although I wouldn't have thought she would have the courage to carry that through.
I do know that last year, a boy in DS's class, who had not left himself enough time to cram for an important exam (an early GCSE), deliberately went up to the head of sanctions and insulted him in the corridor, so as to get internally excluded, so as to be able to study for the exam all day without the distraction of his other classes So already there are DC who appear to be gaming the system, prior to the lanyard offence. Now presumably he could just have been unable to find his lanyard, no insulting of teachers necessary!
I had originally assumed that the internal exclusion system was supposed to be to remove children from classrooms where they were being disruptive and not letting others learn, not for offences that have no bearing on classroom learning . I guess I thought this because it seemed to me to be counterproductive to insist that a child who might otherwise benefit from learning in a class and who is not preventing others learning is internally excluded and likely to then end up falling behind.
Is it normal in other schools to have internal exclusion for offences such as forgetting a lanyard?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.
Secondary education
Internal exclusion for forgetting lanyard?
24 replies
Naem · 17/10/2018 11:13
OP posts:
Soursprout ·
17/10/2018 12:13
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.