My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Secondary education

UK comp tops the PISA charts

63 replies
OP posts:
Report
RJnomore1 · 16/12/2016 23:34

Yeah it was never going to be a Scottish school was it 😬

Report
Refluxsux · 17/12/2016 07:44

Does the data PISA collects come only from state schools or are independents included as well?

OP posts:
Report
prh47bridge · 17/12/2016 08:04

Independent schools are included as well.

Report
TalkinPeace · 17/12/2016 15:38

Interesting as the overall outcome of the PISA tests this time around shows that city kids at non selective state schools do best, all over the world

Report
GreenGinger2 · 17/12/2016 17:05

So what other cities aside from London are included in that?

Report
TalkinPeace · 17/12/2016 17:19

How do you mean?
The 200 UK schools are from all over the country and all sectors .....
PISA have upped their game on sampling this time around

the top systems consistently are Singapore and Macau - which are City States

Report
IrenetheQuaint · 17/12/2016 17:25

This doesn't mean that Alexandra Park scored highest of any school in the tests, just that it was above all national averages. I'd be surprised if it wasn't beaten by various Far Eastern schools on an individual level.

Still, great result.

Report
TalkinPeace · 17/12/2016 17:40

The school's scores were higher than the average in any other country, way, way ahead of the UK average and statistically ahead of Singapore

they did incredibly well.

I'd love to know how India would do if they took part

Report
Refluxsux · 17/12/2016 18:20

Do they release the individual school scores? I wonder where they landed against the other individual schools?

OP posts:
Report
Manumission · 17/12/2016 18:25

The school sounds astonished.

I wouldn't put any of my DC in a comp in that area. Not dead.

Report
TalkinPeace · 17/12/2016 18:36

reflux
yes, you can download the full dataset from the pisa site - I was going to but its 414MB and I have paying work to do Smile

Report
Refluxsux · 17/12/2016 18:43

Why not Manumission? Muswell Hill isn't exactly rough.

OP posts:
Report
Manumission · 17/12/2016 18:50

All those semi-suburbs are getting worse IMO. But I'm an escapee so I have an escapee's perspective after decades in London. Others differ of course.

Report
TalkinPeace · 17/12/2016 20:18

Muswell Hill "rough"
ROTFLMAOPMPL
you would not know rough if it slapped you in the face if you think Muswell hill is rough

Report
SoggyDays · 17/12/2016 20:21

That's just brilliant!

Well done to them.

Report
HPFA · 18/12/2016 07:38

Fantastic performance by the school. With about 25% disadvantaged pupils its clearly doing a fantastic job for all sections of the community.
By the way 57% of disadvantaged pupils in the school get 5+ GCSEs, the same as the average for all pupils in Kent. Which is why of course the govt wants to follow the Kent model for education rather than the Alexandra Park one. Sigh.

Report
GreenGinger2 · 18/12/2016 08:13

Hmm frankly I'd be more impressed if it was a non London school in say a coastal area or a Northern town with high numbers of white working class boys and few immigrant families.

The school itself says it has some very privileged children. According to that BBC link all UK schools who did well were among the most advantaged in the UK in terms of social economics and cultural status.

Report
GreenGinger2 · 18/12/2016 08:30

They have below average levels of kids on FSM, wonder what the average house price is near Muswell Hill.

Report
Refluxsux · 18/12/2016 09:48

Part of the catchment falls in MH but the other part goes all the way into Wood Green which can hardly be called an advantaged area. Only two MH primaries feed into it and the top kids from both tend to go Indy or grammar. It's nothing like MHs other secondary Fortismere. To have out performed all the indies in the sample is a huge accomplishment.

OP posts:
Report
aimlessandblameless · 18/12/2016 09:50

all UK schools who did well were among the most advantaged in the UK in terms of social economics and cultural status.

Why is anyone surprised or even depressed by that?

Aspirational families support their children to do well at school. No matter how brilliant the schools, the children from the supportive families will always do better because they are learning at home too ... even if not academically, then socially and culturally. And by "aspirational" I don't mean "middle-class" - I mean aspirational. Almost by definition there are plenty of aspirational families in immigrant/migrant populations who won't stay at the bottom of the tree for more than a generation or so. They will be the new middle class eventually.

Cities tend to have more migrants and therefore more aspirational families than rural areas, and London is the biggest city in the UK. Of course it is going to top the league (so long as teachers can afford to live there).

We need to worry about areas that have entrenched poverty-of-aspiration, and we need to pour resources into bouncing them out of it, but we shouldn't be surprised or depressed if they don't top any league tables in the meantime.

Report
GreenGinger2 · 18/12/2016 10:30

Reflux compared to areas in Britain miles away from London with high numbers of unemployment little aspiration,few immigrant families....... sorry I don't care how far the catchment goes,it's a world away. The lowest catchment in London will be out of the reach of the maj of families in Britain.

London also has heaps more funding. Said school overlooks a golf course and has acres of land to play with. Wonder how the comps with crumbling buildings,zero land,no London funding,zero aspirational families fare? Pointless stats. You pick away at Pisa tests and you see how unreliable they are.

The OECD also say it is the state schools with similar affluence to pupils in private schools that do well in these tests. Nuff said.

Report
GreenGinger2 · 18/12/2016 10:35

Some of the parents at that school will be richer than parents who send their DC to private schools in other parts of the country.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

aimlessandblameless · 18/12/2016 11:21

They're richer because they're more aspirational.

That's not to say all aspirational prod are rich of course. Many of us aspire to other things than money. But it's probably fair to say that all rich people are , for the most part, aspirational. Unless they've just won the lottery or had a big inheritance of course.

Report
aimlessandblameless · 18/12/2016 11:27

London schools need more money because of the London weighting - everything is more expensive. In my area young teachers can barely afford to rent, never mind buy, a home.

Report
MumTryingHerBest · 18/12/2016 11:36

GreenGinger2 The OECD also say it is the state schools with similar affluence to pupils in private schools that do well in these tests.

So did all the private schools that do well in those test outperform this state school?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.