Talk

Advanced search

Vital mistake of baptism date in baptism certificate made by church - how it will affect our chances

(23 Posts)
confusedperson Fri 02-Nov-12 14:06:10

My DS was baptized when he was 1 year 3 months, but when we collected the baptism certificate, the year is mistaken and it looks as he was baptized when he was 3 months old. The entry date is correct (one year later), but it is in small letters and in the very corner, so I am not sure if anyone will notice at all.

This mistake gives me an unexpected chance to get into a RC secondary where age of baptism is an important criteria (I still have to prove 3 years of weekly mass attendance, but this is not a problem).

I am not sure how admissions are done, but can I hope that this mistake will help us to get in where I thought we had no chance in getting in? Are they checking baptism dates thoroughly (through church?) or they just look at baptism date and that’s all?

UltraBOF Fri 02-Nov-12 14:09:49

You can give it a go, and say you misremembered if pulled up on it. I imagine you'll need to say a few Hail Marys though grin

confusedperson Fri 02-Nov-12 14:12:47

Well obviously is not my fault so I did not do anything wrong.
I didn't mention the main point though - if I want to get in into one particular secondary, I would have to move closer it - then with <1year baptism date I would be almost guaranteed a place, but with >1year, I am not so sure...

UltraBOF Fri 02-Nov-12 14:15:14

Morally, it would still be wrong to be complicit in deceiving the school though. If you have to move house (do you rent? How easy is a move?) and risk being found out, it seems a big palaver, don't you think?

tiggytape Fri 02-Nov-12 14:40:26

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

confusedperson Fri 02-Nov-12 14:57:58

Thank you tiggytape I just checked the school’s supplementary form and they do ask to write down the date of baptism. I am not sure if I dare to lie on the form, I’d rather just right the correct date and hope for the best. I have heard rumours that nevertheless the strict religious criteria, this school was accused selecting by more affluent postcode or refusing single parents, no wonder they are doing so well. We do have another half-decent option, but I wanted to move from my area anyway to a better area, so thought perhaps that super-well-doing school would be our best bet. Need to rethink my options now smile

confusedperson Fri 02-Nov-12 14:58:25

*right = write

tiggytape Fri 02-Nov-12 15:20:30

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

peteneras Fri 02-Nov-12 21:08:29

Is it very difficult to go back to the church and ask them to correct the error and perhaps issue you with a new certificate to put everything above board? I would prefer to do it this way.

sashh Sat 03-Nov-12 04:33:46

Are they checking baptism dates thoroughly (through church?) or they just look at baptism date and that’s all?

They are weeding out eastern European pupils. In the UK it is common to baptise babies, in eastern Europe it is not common before the child is at least 1.

So assuming you are not Polish you will be fine.

NewFerry Sat 03-Nov-12 09:33:10

That's a very interesting, and controversial, point re the eastern Europeans. If true, then would these parents have grounds to appeal if they didn't get a place as the custom in their home country is different?
Seems very harsh if not.

tiggytape Sat 03-Nov-12 11:06:49

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AngelEyes46 Sat 03-Nov-12 19:35:33

Confused - my dd was baptised at 14 months and one of the schools that we put was under 6 months baptism, the other under 1 year. I went through so many thoughts - should I 'amend' her baptism certificate to a year earlier as only a copy is needed. But, parish records would have shown differently and the priest does have to send a form in stating date of baptism and attendance of mass. You could phone your parish and ask what date they have for your ds! However, as others have said the stress and worry and the embarrassment to my dd if found out (and of course the immorality). In the end, I applied with the reasons as to why my dd was not baptised within 6 months/1 year and she was accepted for both. You will (I am sure) have very valid reasons as to why your ds was not baptised within the timeline and the governors are very reasonable in taking everything into account. Remember though, they cannot guess - put everything down (my 'reasonings' came to 6 pages). You also have the added worry as to whether to move which is unusual as RC schools don't normally take distance into account (CE may moreso). Good luck with whatever you do-it's such a worrying time - my sil is going through it this year.

admission Sat 03-Nov-12 21:37:45

The bottom line here is that if you get a place at the school and the school accepted the incorrect date because you put it down or because of the inaccurate certificate and the school then find out they will almost for certainty remove the place that has been offered. You will then be left trying to get a place in a school that has places available, in other words the kind of school you do not want!
I would fully agree with this decision because you have got a place under false or at the very least very dubious circumstances. The school has the right to do this according to the admission regulations and if it is a vastly over subscribed school they will not hesitate to take such action. Apart from the need to be seen to follow the rules it will act as a deterrent to other parents who might be tempted to try to bend the rules.
The bottom line is you will almost for sure get caught out in this and it is simply not worth the hassle it will cause. It is far preferable to try and get a suitable letter from the priest confirming that the child be considered a baptised catholic, meeting the requirments. One such letter is called the certificate of reception into the catholic church, which the school is supposed to accept as the equivalent of being baptised. The key is to get it done now and accepted rather than wait till after the cut off date for applications, when it will get far messier to sort out.
The other side of the coin here is whether this is a school that has an admission criteria which is unfair. Whilst I understand the wish for catholic children to be baptised shortly after birth, the reality is that this is now not always the case and as others have said it is uncommon in eastern european catholics, who are every bit as much catholic as their british couterparts. I therefore personally feel that the admission criteria is flawed and illegal as it is not treating all equal. However to get this sorted means that you need to complain to the schools adjudicator about the admission criteria and get them to agree, who can then order the school to follow another admission criteria.

sicutlilium Sat 03-Nov-12 22:30:01

How would this play in the confessional, I wonder?

confusedperson Sun 04-Nov-12 09:32:03

Thank you for responses. Well, for some reason the morality does not bother me in this case - so many parents in DS's RC primary are so obviously religious only for school purpose that morality is the last thing on their minds.

But I would not want to lie in the application either. The only thing I can do is to write the year date in unclear manner so the admission team has to pick up the baptism certificate to double check and then they think what they want to think. So there is no actual lie in it.

As to why we didn't baptize DS before 1 year old, it is so trivial now, but in the beginning he was so small, then we were waiting for warm period, then our god parents (my best friend) became unavailable.. and our church does baptism only 4 times in a year.. I guess I was just disorganized and I did not know secondary rules at the time.. neither I cared, to be honest.. I thought that attending the church was the main requirement, but appears it is not. So here I am.

AngelEyes46 I am about 4.5 miles from the said school and the parents of the primary already talk that they don't seem to accept from my postcode, while the nearby postcode (much more affluent area and about 4.3 miles) always gets places...

tiggytape Sun 04-Nov-12 16:48:10

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AngelEyes46 Sun 04-Nov-12 19:33:10

I agree with Tiggy - Confused - as I said before your reasons are valid! I submitted a letter from my priest stating that mine (and my family's faith) was sound and that the date of baptism for my dd was through circumstances rather than beliefs. I do feel for you though Confused as your mind is all over the place in getting what you feel is the best secondary school for your DS.

confusedperson Mon 05-Nov-12 15:37:55

AngelEyes46 can I ask how do you get your priest to sign such letter? Especially if I am planning to move away from the parish if I want to be in a nearer catchment.

[The school I am talking about has just been brought up in MN by other mumsnetters...]

confusedperson Mon 05-Nov-12 15:52:02

AngelEyes46 I found on another thread that we are talking about the same school (JF) - is that right? And you said you know more children who got in with delayed baptism.... can I know more details, please?

MordionAgenos Mon 05-Nov-12 16:57:40

sashh IME they are not weeding out Eastern Europeans at all, they make allowance for them, also for genuine converts, what they are trying to do is weed out the families where the parents are lapsed catholics and never bothered to get their children baptised till they realised they would need to if they wanted to go to the catholic school.

AngelEyes46 Mon 05-Nov-12 21:28:39

Confused - it was my dd that was 14 months - and the schools were Coloma and St Phils. I have twin ds's and they are at JF (currently year 9). They were baptised at 5 months so they were ok. What I did say for my dd was that my ds' were baptised at an early stage trying to show that my faith was 'sound' prior to my dd being born. When my dd was born, one of my twins was ill - he had acute tonsillitis and every time I tried to book my dd's baptism, it would flare up and I would postpone her baptism. I had PND (although not bad), my doctor also wrote a letter stating that that first year of my dd's life was difficult for me and that I was concerned in not being able to arrange my dd's baptism. My parish priest also verified that I had attended mass for a number of years and he hoped that the delay in my daughter's baptism did not deter her getting a place.

Most of the boys from my dcs primary school go to JF and I know that not all of them were under the year (you find out these things in year 6 with all the worry that is going around). Most of the reasons are sickness of either the child, sibling or parent. However, it is written in the small print of JF's policy that anything over 16 months won't really be entertained but good reasons for under will put you into the top category (assuming mass attendance is verified).

You can only do your best for your children and put everything down that impinged your ds's baptism.

AngelEyes46 Sun 11-Nov-12 20:37:50

Agree with Mordion - there are many people who are genuine and that's who the faith schools want to choose not those who have decided to 'find' faith so that their dc can get into the best school.

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: