I believe this has been discussed in edication circles to some degree but hiw do people feel about the idea of calculating league tables based partly on academic attainment but comparing this with deprivation in the particular area. Though there are exceptions to every rule, it often goes that schools in privelged areas perform far better than those in more disadvantaged communities and the statistics bear this out. In Scotland for example, the county with highest average household income (where houses are extrotionate because people want to be in the catchment areas) top the league tables. Glasgow with some 80% of the poorest areas (sharing a border with aforementioned county with no green belt between) come bottom. And within Glasgow the school with lowest free school meal entitlement came at the top while highest free meals school came pretty much bottom.
I have heard various arguments about this. Of course we can not ignore the fact people in poorer areas have more barriers to success, both financial and support from parents and even peers (in some areas kids get bullied for working hard while in others there is a culture of being pushed to limits by parents and teachers). But we should also be careful having lower aspirations in poorer areas. Also families with high paying jobs are often working their rear ends off to fund living in a good catchment area or send DC to private schools and fund extra study and other activities that boost their self esteem and social skills.
So should league tables be done on a academic vs free meal ratio or similar, or do we just ignore other influences and take results as is?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.
Secondary education
Should league tables account for deprivation?
16 replies
pixiepixel3 · 14/07/2011 17:25
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.