My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

A place for stay at home mums and dads to discuss life as a full-time parent.

SAHP

Homemaker on birth cert but actually still employed

43 replies

BubblegumTulips · 25/02/2020 14:50

My DH went to register our baby's birth today and he gave my occupation as homemaker, as that's what I will be now. However I have not yet handed in my notice at work, because I am being cheeky and holding out for some accrued annual leave pay in about 8 months time. This is the only reason I've not officially resigned yet (it will get me about £2k just because of how the leave year falls). I don't mind my occupation being "homemaker" on the certificate, but is it actually legal? Given that it's a legal document and actually I am employed at the moment. Perhaps I'm overthinking it, but I don't want any problems when we come to apply for child benefit etc... Anyone know?

OP posts:
Report
dennisdonut · 25/02/2020 15:06

It doesn’t matter

Report
WingingItWithTwo · 01/03/2020 00:09

I did it with my first, I stuttered when the registrar asked for the same reason and he was like shalI just put homemaker. That was nearly three years ago, I now am I full time homemaker but no one ever questioned it.

Report
ArnoldBee · 01/03/2020 00:12

I really wouldn't worry. My mums place of birth was wrong on mine. Made sure it was correct for her death certificate though.

Report
DropYourSword · 01/03/2020 00:16

I recently made a will and they explained to me why they ask for professions. It’s fairly antiquated I that it’s simply another way of identifying the correct person. In this day and age it’s not really relevant any more. It’s entirely inconsequential- apart from obviously it might be bugging you.

Report
BlueHarry · 01/03/2020 00:19

I don't think it matters from a legal point of view, but it would bother me.

Report
catspyjamas123 · 01/03/2020 00:29

Personally it would massively bother me that I had a job and yet my husband had gone along and described me a a homemaker. It smacks of the little woman being put in her place by the patriarchy. Still, if it doesn’t bother you....

Report
bookmum08 · 01/03/2020 01:56

I originally had me down as 'retail worker' even though it had been two years since I gave up work. I regretted it as I didn't want that to be how I am defined. It was my sucky boring job that paid me money. Doesn't make me Who I Am. We got married when our daughter was almost 4. You can redo the birth certificate to show the marriage (and legally make her 'legitimate'). I asked if I could change my job description and I could. I am now listed as Homemaker. Old fashioned? Yeah a bit. But I prefer it.
I have always disliked how people are often defined by their job when it is just a job and nothing to do with what is actually important in their lives.

Report
ColdCottage · 01/03/2020 02:22

Surely you put down your career not current situation as that is mother for most women with a baby up to 6 weeks old.

I see it more of something future generations will look back and see when they research family trees.

Report
TillyTheTiger · 01/03/2020 03:06

Legally I don't think it matters. DH did the opposite with me when he registered DD's birth and put my occupation as '[industry] manager' even though I've been a SAHM since having DS 3 years ago. I'll be going back to it once DD is in preschool so it's not inaccurate really, it's still my profession even if I'm not in current employment.

Report
catspyjamas123 · 01/03/2020 06:34

The fact you had a boring job that didn’t define you is part of who you are!! Isn’t everyone a homemaker? I mean everyone who has a home, at least? Cooking, washing and scrubbing the loo doesn’t define me! Its just basic stuff I have to do. In the past there was no space for the mother to have an occupation. We were just wombs. The fact that we do now have the opportunity to describe a role outside the home is a victory. Best to make use of it.

Report
bookmum08 · 01/03/2020 08:56

Not everyone has a 'career' though. For the census next year I am thinking of putting "Homemaker and mother of an asd child and Afol (adult fan of Lego) who builds models to display at shows". Because if the government need to know what people are doing with their lives and future folks using it to study history then that is how I would prefer to be remembered.

Report
LisaSimpsonsbff · 01/03/2020 09:01

I originally had me down as 'retail worker' even though it had been two years since I gave up work. I regretted it as I didn't want that to be how I am defined. It was my sucky boring job that paid me money. Doesn't make me Who I Am.

Hmm The form asks for your occupation, not a definition of your inner essence...

Report
WelcometoCranford · 01/03/2020 09:09

I put student on mine as that was my occupation at the time. It's not my occupation now but that was then. If my ex had registered the birth (which he couldn't as we weren't married/he didn't attend the birth), I dread to think what he would have given as my occupation Hmm.

Report
Imok · 01/03/2020 09:17

When my dcs were born, there wasn't even a space in the certificate for the mother's occupation! My Dh actually registered both our dcs and insisted that they include my occupation, so my dcs certificates have my name etc followed by my occupation in brackets.
I'm not sure that there is any 'legal' comeback, but I understand that you would want it to be correct. Also, if any of your descendants ever wanted to research their family tree, it would be extra, interesting information for them. Not convinced it has any real value beyond that.

Report
bookmum08 · 01/03/2020 09:30

I suppose I seem to have a different view from most of you. I just don't like people always having to be defined (on forms etc) by the job they happen to be doing at that particular time - men included.
Anyway no one checks on what you put. You could put anything really. Infact my husband has his job title as his ("day services co ordinater") which most people won't have a clue what that is and in what environment he works.

Report
catspyjamas123 · 01/03/2020 09:37

The purpose of asking for occupation on the census is so the stats can be used to plan all sorts of things - public transport springs to mind. Most people do jobs for work, some people call it a career and some don’t. They are all occupations. Yes, it isn’t your inner essence but often it’s a skill that others don’t have and - more to the point - it’s the question they are asking! We can all cook dinner, change nappies and provide moral support - with differing levels of success. Women have strived to be more than just domestic accessories.

I won’t have a husband to fall back on any more and anyway I have never defined myself as a homemaker. Yet strangely I am able to support my two children single handedly, one with additional needs. The house gets cleaned, the meals get cooked, the clothes get washed and in addition I have an occupation that brings in an income to support us all.

Report
catspyjamas123 · 01/03/2020 09:38

I don’t have....not won’t have. Autocorrect strikes again!

Report
Umberellaellaella · 01/03/2020 09:42

Did you not also go along to the registering?

Report
emilybrontescorsett · 01/03/2020 09:42

If would be annoyed y that.
Does your dh have A brain?
Would he be happy to be

Report
bluebluezoo · 01/03/2020 09:43

It was my sucky boring job that paid me money. Doesn't make me Who I Am

Why is homemaker any better? That does define you? Personally i think cooking, cleaning and childcare for a man is a pretty sucky job that doesn’t pay me money.

I am more defined by my job than i am by my marital status and my ability to look after a man and children. I always think domestic labels reduces me to a background entity just there to meet a man’s purpose- make his home and bear his children.

Would a man ever put homemaker on a legal document?

Report
emilybrontescorsett · 01/03/2020 09:46

Posted too soon.
Would your h be happy to be documented as homemaker?
I know several adults whose father registered them with a different name to the one They had agreed upon with their wife.
It wasn't a slight variation either but a completely different name.
Think Catherine Louise being the chosen name and dad registering g the child as Marianne Sarah.
I would be fuming.
It will always be documented that you weren't working and it is incorrect.

Report
DippingToes · 01/03/2020 09:47

I'd ask for it to be changed to your actual career. I'd think of future generations researching their great grandmother's family tree expecting greatness...then oh. Smile

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

catspyjamas123 · 01/03/2020 09:48

I also certainly wouldn’t have let my ex-DH go and register the birth for me. I did the pushing FFS! We went together but if we couldn’t have I would have gone alone. This is not Gilead!

Report
emilybrontescorsett · 01/03/2020 09:49

umberella married parents don't have to go together to register.

Report
emilybrontescorsett · 01/03/2020 09:52

I'd also make him go and change it and let the registrar know that he is a dimwit who doesn't know his own wife's occupation.
I'd make him pay any necessary fee too.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.