My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Primary education

Survey on primary working hours - are you happy that the word is out?

60 replies

pointythings · 28/02/2014 18:26

article in today's Guardian

A survey conducted by the DfE says it's official - primary teachers work stupidly long hours. Does anyone here think the teacher bashing is now going to stop?

OP posts:
Report
LindyHemming · 28/02/2014 18:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

clam · 28/02/2014 18:52

But it's not the "real world" though, is it?

Wink

Report
LindyHemming · 28/02/2014 21:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

pointythings · 28/02/2014 21:13

Given that the real world is where Michael Gove lives, would you like to join him?

(Am not a teacher, but I am a parent who appreciates teachers)

I'm going to hang on to this article and post it into every 'AIBU to think teachers should not strike/complain/be enemies of promise because they have it so easy?' thread.

OP posts:
Report
mrz · 28/02/2014 22:22

get ready for the 27th Wink

Report
clam · 01/03/2014 10:15

Don't you just love the way newspaper editors pick such lovely photos of Gove? Is there a decent picture of him anywhere?

Report
Feenie · 01/03/2014 11:37

Thanks, pointythings! Thanks

Report
pointythings · 01/03/2014 13:44

mrz what happens on the 27th?

OP posts:
Report
pussycatdoll · 01/03/2014 13:46

Another strike ? Grin

Report
Feenie · 01/03/2014 13:46

There's a strike planned for Wednesday 26th March Wink

Report
pussycatdoll · 01/03/2014 13:51

Our school never closes when there's a strike
No classes close either
It's very odd

Report
Ilikepinkwine · 01/03/2014 13:58

I often wonder what would happen if we all resigned on the same day...
:)

Report
clam · 01/03/2014 13:59

It depends which Union is striking, pussycatdoll. There are a few. Plus, it may just be that the relevant teachers have elected not to do so in the past, although that doesn't mean they might not decide to do so this time.

Report
Sparkle9 · 01/03/2014 14:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

pointythings · 01/03/2014 14:56

I support the right of any teacher to strike against all the shit the idiot Gove is pulling. Simple as that.

OP posts:
Report
noblegiraffe · 01/03/2014 18:49

Why are the articles all about primary when secondary teachers work nearly as many hours? Or is 56 hours a week considered acceptable? Confused

Report
mrz · 01/03/2014 19:34

because it was a survey of primary teacher's workload?

Report
noblegiraffe · 01/03/2014 19:55

No, it was a survey of teachers' workload, the results were broken down into primary (59 hours) secondary (56 hours) and heads (63 hours).

Report
noblegiraffe · 01/03/2014 20:01

www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/285941/DFE-RR316.pdf

That's the full survey. I really don't understand the overwhelming focus on primary.

Report
mrz · 01/03/2014 20:08

perhaps they've just discovered primary teachers exist Hmm

Report
AryaUnderfoot · 01/03/2014 20:20

The focus on primary teachers is because they work '60' hours a week instead of '50-something'. A number with 6 in front of it sounds so much bigger than a number with 5.

After all, everyone in the 'real world' works 50-something hours a week and only gets 25 days' annual leave. Wink

Report
OddBoots · 01/03/2014 20:27

If anyone is interested there is something you may fill in if you want to register your support of teachers.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

pointythings · 01/03/2014 20:30

Signed, OddBoots and following the FB page too. Thanks!

OP posts:
Report
PastSellByDate · 01/03/2014 21:12

pointythings:

I get your point - 60 hour week is long hours - but

ask a doctor or GP

ask a nurse or midwife

ask a University lecturer

ask anyone...

moreover - whereas many of us work these hours incessently - we do witness that teachers have breaks every 6-7 weeks of at least 1 week or 2 weeks + a long spell (6-7 weeks) over July/ August/ sometimes Early September. Many in other professions don't have that luxury of downtime (even though I know many teachers use half-terms/ Christmas vacations to catch up, prepare materials, etc...) - nevertheless most of us don't have points in our jobs when the face to face work load disappears and you can deal with backlog uninterrupted. We also certainly don't get 5 days + a year of training.

The reality is Britain has a long hour work culture - and presentee-ism means that many don't feel it's possible to have even a sick day when they've got a foul cold.

Do I think teachers work hard - absolutely.

Do I think teachers work effectively - debateable.

Do I think teachers don't effectively explain or indeed share 'gathered' data with parents thereby doing work which remains total invisible to the end user (the pupil/ concerned parent) - YES. And I suspect therein lise the problem ....

Good example - DD2 has transfered to another school. New school quite legitimately requested transcript for DD2. Old school declined to do so - but would send through KS1 SATs results.

Now let's talk time wastage:

  1. All the time old school spent recording progress of DD2 on whatever progress tracking programme they were using

  2. All the time new school spent ringing old school/ teacher trying to get some background information on DD2

  3. All the time new school has spent retesting DD2 and discussing where to place her within groups (sets) of students

  4. All the time new school will spend filling in the blank of her non-existent transcript.

    This doens't affect me at all as a parent and new school has been brilliant with DD2 - spending a great deal of time sorting out where she's at.

    But don't bash parents for thinking teachers work ineffectively/ inefficiently - if you behave this way to each other (which let's face it in this instance is downright unprofessional) - just as an external observer - I've got to wonder whether you can focus on core learning for pupils.

    I suspect a great deal of energy is expended producing the statistics to ensure expected progress/ exceeding expected progress to justify increments - and indeed that effort (thought totally understandable) has nil benefit for learning as far as the pupil is concerned.

    I also know that these ridiculous end of year novels which whitter on about how darling Geoffrey enjoyed exploring movement through dance last term - and avoid any sort of efficient conveying of achievement relative to school and/or national standards - must eat huge amounts of your time. Yes they establish that you're aware my child is in your class - but often you've just cut and pasted information from your first report - thus I receive a report informating me my child enjoyed a field trip thorough - wonderful but unfortunatley she didn't attend this wonderful trip because she was off with chicken pox.
Report
PastSellByDate · 01/03/2014 21:15

Oh and before you say University lecturers have June/ July/ August off -

let me remind you that June is marking exams (often turnign around 60 scripts of 10 - 12 pages in 48 hours)

July/ August are spent doing the lab work/ research/ background reading for reports/ publications and/or preparing teaching materials for the next academic cycle.

There usually is a spate of admin - course outline/ designs, VLE updating, etc... necessary + Welcome packs/ induction planning for new intake

Oh and if you want to save your marriage and steel about of time with your children - you sneak off for a long weekend - maybe a week at a push - you only end up harragued about how you should have attended X important meeting/ briefing or are needed urgently to mark re-sits.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.