SATS - am I missing something? If not, how do I get the school to educate my child rather than prepare for SATS for the next year please?(44 Posts)
So, I think that SATS are standardised tests set to assess schools (not children) and are generally agreed to have passed their sell-by date. In our area, the maths results will, apparently, be used to decide what set children go into in year 7.
So why the song and dance? Why, at my year 5's November parent-teacher consultation did we spend 9 of the 10 minutes being told levels (4c, 5a, 5b, etc) that mean bugger all to me? Why were the current year 6s "stressed" about the SATS according to their parents and so "exhausted" that they dropped out of their after-school activities.
Please - help me organise resistance. If I'd wanted a year being taught to the test, I'd have moved to a grammar school area where at least the results of the test matter to the child as well as the school......
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Hello, yes our dd is H.ed. I think she will do GCSE's in order to have choices for FE and HE if she chooses. There are a number of ways you can do this and at this moment there are changes emerging in FE to allow H.ed dc to attend colleges 14 - 19 to take GCSE's, so its quite interesting atm.
We don't follow the nc, although having 2 older dc who went through the system I know what type of thing they were capable of during primary school years. I don't think she will do 10/11 GCSE's like schools expect them to do, it will probably be just the 5 and a level 3 qual or a couple of A levels, really depending on her priorities at the time. There are several other opportunities she has for gaining UCAS points through exams she takes in Music and Dance.
DS2 did SATs in y6, and although he as not stressed he was very bored by the endless practice for the SATs. DS1 who left primary in Y5 to go to an indie had a much more interesting Y6 as they did not do SATs. They did CATs (verbal and non-verbal reasoning) but the children and parents were not told in advance, and there were no practice tests - much better handled.
SATs are for the benefit of the school in league tables - of no use to the DC.
Purely out of curiosity, if your daughter is no longer in state education and will not be assessed or monitored by anyone, may I ask if she's being home schooled? And do you hope for her to pass any formal qualifications (GCSE/A-levels) or continue to higher education?
I'm just wondering if that's possible without assessment at some point or another.
My Dcs primary used to spend a whole month cramming for the SATS. The children got incredibly stressed, and I just don't see the point. Surely a spot test would be more accurate?
let's hope it will be like Raspberry's year. I take your point about the way the girls can react.
I can see that it is squaring a circle - it's also perhaps something where the pendulum will and must keep swinging. After all, lots of bright people have tried to solve these problems. It seems that the more consistent and impressive the tests, the narrower the range of things they actually test (like the ABRSM instrument exams). Whereas if you start by trying to assess lots of different kind of children in different kinds of ways and to keep this all making some kind of sense you and up with a big baggy monster that's open to mockery by the general public and probably does become a parody of itself after a few years .... and so we go "back to basics" for a while.....
is there a model we could develop that takes the pendulum issue into account or is that hopeless?
My Dcs have been at Junior school with great SATs results (my DC got Level 5s - 6 not an option then). It was a small part of a busy Year 6 that was full of visitors, trips, exciting topics, a production, sporting opportunities, music concerts .....
Most of the stress that there was seemed to be generated by pupils (generally girls) being aware that they were supposed to be stressed and therefore being dramatic and being stressed.
Levels are to be scrapped BUT Ofsted will still be looking for schools to provide robust evidence of progress at the individual pupil leve. Outstanding schools are to lead the way in developing systems that square this apparent circle....[as the government can't work out how to]
DS and DD are at a state school, just recently graded Outstanding in all areas, which does not focus on SATs at all beyond a small amount of familiarisation in the course of the year.
They have normal lessons, do the full breadth of the curriculum, go on trips, enoy being the oldest in the school, do some great topics, loads of sport and some geuinely stretching Maths...and have a few days of tests towards the end of the year (every year group does tests at the same time so it's just 'something that you do'.)
End of story.
ah, ok, so maybe then I'll be knocking at an open door? Hope so.
"Teachers and schools in the state sector are obsessed with levels because Ofsted are obsessed with levels"
If we are still in the state sector at Yr6, the plan is to take DD out and home ed her for a year, so you're not alone in this.
The bigger issue though, which the SATs thing is just another example of, is that the interests of the school are no longer the same as the interests of the child. It's to no child's benefit to have a dull yr6, but it is very much to the benefit of the school, so it happens.
I'm not against assessment per se and I know that schools have to be accountable because they are responsible for most childrens education.
I just think the whole SATS administration has gone too far.
When my older dc were little they didn't know when they had taken their SATS and neither were the parents informed when this would be. There was no stress even from the most pushiest schools.
Now with the obsession of results and Ofsted using results to grade a school, children can in some schools be really pressured and this is so wrong.
It seems like its hit and miss whether your dc school acts in the best interests of the dc.
I know the teachers have no say in this and I certainly don't blame them, after all most of them do a fine job, but afaic the system stinks.
No, I'm not a teacher - but even if I was, I think I'd still have some grounds to argue that I wasn't a proponent of seeing the result not the child etc etc!
Sorry, may have I mistaken you for another poster, are you not a teacher?
TBH I didn't attend my Dd's reception meeting so I didn't have to listen to the headteacher witter on about SATS and tables like when my Ds started, heard it all before, had experience of how important the SATS are rather than Dc's well being. CT's are constantly doing teacher assessments through out the school year so I don't see the point of the SATS especially the YR 2 SATS.
I get what you're saying - and I don't disagree, but DDs are genuinely at a school where they have scolded DH & I for "doing too much" with our children. [as in you are in the wrong to be teaching Y4 pupils how to divide].
We've basically decided to do our own thing (informed by brother & S-I-L who teach in US) and friends at other (and better) schools in this LEA who actually get homework and copy it for us.
I think a good example is preparing a "persuasive" letter. Our school spent 2 weeks (infrequently setting aside time in small blocks) to write one brief formal letter to the HT about something. I know it happened, but the work was never sent home so I've no idea how DDs did with this task.
A friend's child at a locally Outstanding school was encouraged to write to someone she admired and ask them to come and speak at their school for optional homework. This DC wrote to the guy off deadly 60 who sweetly said he was off filming, but sent pencils, stickers, a quiz pack, etc... which the DC was absolutely thrilled with and some learning resources for the school. Apparently every child in the class had this as an optional homework and all of them did it with most receiving something (a pencil, a photo, etc...) from the person they wrote to and one author agreeing to come next year for a whole school assembly & some library reading time.
As I said to DH - if only we lived 500m the other side of X Road - what a difference a half-mile makes eh?
touredewaterparcs - having an outstanding Ofsted only gives you respite from Ofsted for as long as your SATs results show the school is maintaining its standards in terms of attainment and progress. In other words, if your sole aim is to keep Ofsted away, you might as well be totally obsessed with SATs results and teaching to the test to the exclusion of most other things, because that's largely all they are assessing you on when deciding whether or not to visit you again, given your last glowing report... Outstanding or not, if your school's SATs results start dipping, Ofsted will pay them a visit. It won't pay them a visit because the school is teaching to the test, because it doesn't know that, it just knows that it once thought the school outstanding and the results it gets in SATs don't indicate things are now otherwise... hence not much to persuade the school to change its behaviour, unless lots of parents complain to Ofsted that they think the school's rubbish...
And yes, whilst they may be getting rid of SATs, they haven't yet, have they...
I agree with rabbit - if the past few years have been done there's no need to panic. We encourage them to do a sats revision book at home but it isn't compulsory and timetable totally normal til jan/feb. stressed kids don't perform so it's not in the school's best interests to put pressure on.
Our top half and bottom group won't notice it, the ones just below average will have booster groups but they come with snack bribery and anyway, writing is assessed by a portfolio over time...
I take your point pastsellbydate.
Thoughts though: developing good exam technique for a specific exam is something very different from learning to write better and read with more understanding. It's also very different from getting a more profound foundational knowledge of maths and science.
Do we risk doing the former because we don't have the confidence or quality to do the latter? I don't know.....
I think this SATs obsession/ stress thing really depends on the school.
I suspect schools which are secure in the knowledge their pupils are heading for 90% or better achieving NC Level 4 are much more relaxed about the whole process.
Our school, sadly is not in that position, and I suspect Y6 will be spent working with a large minority who are performing under NC Level 4 in a last ditch/ rearguard action to get those kids over the threshold.
DD1 has been saying since Y4 that Y6 will be boring - so it is widely known at our school that Y6 is about revision (revising books are issued to each child after Christmas) and lots of practice SATs to identify areas of weakness for poorer performing pupils and try to catch them up.
On one hand I am sad for DD1 that Y6 may not be very stimulating, as she's clearly going to be o.k. for SATs and we are attempting 11+ exam (more for educational benefits, then major confidence she'll succeed). However, I can understand that from the school's perspective and for the benefit of children who clearly are struggling in maths & with reading/ writing that the school's time, attention and effort does have to focus on this group of pupils, which can be as much as 50% of a class.
thanks, those are all very helpful comments, (apart from the nightmare one but that's anonymous forums for you ).
I think Hercule's point is very fair, but I imagine that teachers already protest at higher levels. I still think there is something we as parents can do at a local level. If the "customers" ask for nuanced feedback, there must be at least a higher chance that teachers will give it
We are "outstanding" - does that not give us some relief from OFSTED?
Also, is it not the case that OFSTED are abolishing the levels?
I am aware that in one small area of education (music education) the blaming of OFSTED is completely misguided. OFSTED have made it completely clear that "sub-levels" are completely inappropriate for music education (I can dig out a link if anyone's interested) but you hear of music teachers being forced to "sub-level" anyway.
So in that small area at least, attempts to blame OFSTED for insisting on sub-levels are at best ill-informed: a bit like people who reference "Data Protection" law or "Health and Safety" in a way that fits their agenda rather than having any real connection to the law.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.