Someone help me get my head around the order of "preference&quo
t; for admissions.
Right. I just can't get my head around this.
Let's say you can put down 3 preferences, 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
School X receives 22 first preferences applications, 10 second and 3 third. It has 30 places.
I have put it down as my first preference. Will I get priority over those who have put it as a second preference even if I live further than some of the second preferences? Or, have they effectively had 35 applications for 30 places and the five who live furthest away will lose out?
How on earth do you predict whether you have a good chance of getting into a school or not if you don't know how many of those who put it as a second pref will end up getting their first pref and therefore not need an offer from their first pref. Bloody hell it's like a MENSA problem.
As far as I know it's now done on what they call equal preferencing so it doesn't matter whether its your third or first choice you get an equal opportunity depending on the admissions criteria. Otherwise yes you have to second guess what everyone else is doing.
Round here first preference first is only used in a tie break situation which is v v unlikely to happen!
You do not get priority for putting a school down as your first preference. In the scenario you describe the five who live furthest away will lose out even if they all put the school as their first preference.
They must not use first preference first even in a tie break situation. If that is happening in Racmun's LA they are breaking the Admissions Code.
You figure out your chances of getting into a school by looking at what happened in previous years. If they got down to the admissions category that your child will be in and the distance for the last child admitted was further than you live from the school you have a reasonable chance, but note that the distance for the last child can change dramatically from year to year so there are no guarantees.
The admissions booklets ive downloaded for the last four years don't state the distance and the admissions department won't tell me!
The other thing to bear in mind is that whilst all 35 applications will be treated equally under the admissions criteria regardless of preference position stated by parents, a number of the children giving second and third preferences might get their place at their first or second choice schools, thereby freeing up some places.
It is all fairly complicated isn't it. As other pp have said, the preference you give to a school has no effect on whether you get that school place. Putting a school as your only option does not affect your likelihood of getting a school either. I know a few people who think that putting one option means the LEA have to give you that school. Not true though.
Best way to think of it is that your choices will only come into effect if you qualify for more than one school.
However, the system essentially creates long lists of all the children who applied to each school and then ranks those children according to the criteria set by the school or LEA. Then a line is drawn under the last admission, say 60th child. Any children above the line that have put a school as a first choice will be 'locked in' and their 2nd and 3rd choices are removed from the other lists if there were any. Thereby allowing children who were below the cut off initially to move up and potentially get a place.
LEAs publish details on how many children were admitted on each criteria. Some don't give out actual distances though. Decide which criteria you would qualify under and then look at the numbers who qualified under the same criteria, then criteria above and below. if you are in catchment and 20 children were admitted by distance which usually comes after catchment then you would probably be fairly safe. if however in the same scenario no children were accepted on distance and a bulk of the class was admitted on a sibling link then it may mean that not all catchment children that year got a place. It does take a bit of problem solving
I'd also add that it's actually a good system and one that benefits parents. If it didn't exist, you'd get a situation where you'd have to try to second-guess which schools would be over-subscribed. For example, someone I know who didn't understand the system, put an under-subscribed school first and the popular one she liked second, because she didn't want to 'risk' not getting either. This way gives you a shot at a great school you might not have a guaranteed place at without risking your place at a banker.
Farewelltoarms is right. The essence is that you should rank up to six schools in order of your genuine preference without concerning yourself unduly about whether you will get in.
You will, on the first round only get one offer; even you were eligible for more than one school the one offer out of the several possible will be for your highest preference. So it is crucial that your preferences are your real ones.
DO NOT TRY TO GAME THE SYSTEM.
A practical effect of this is that as everyone who gets an offer gets one for the highest preference possible for them is that schools will tend to fill with parents who, in some sense, preferred that school to others. Good thing all around.
The advice you have had about preferences is good - you should genuinely list your schools in order of preference. There is no advantage or tactical benefit to listing them in any other order.
I assume you are being super organised and thinking about Sept 2014 admissions (otherwise you are already late!). If so, and your LA isn't keen on releasing distance information, you have plenty of time to make a freedom of information request and force them to do so. I did it through the website 'whatdotheyknow'. You might even find someone has already done it for your area.
It's all pretty self explanatory on the site and, if you have a look, lots of people have done it for school distances in the past and you can crib the best wording to get the exact information you want. One tip I would give- which I didn't do- is to ask about distances both on offer day and in September. This will give you an idea of how much the effective catchment area grows through waiting lists.
Feel free to PM me if you have questions about the process as I don't want to out myself. I found it really useful.
Wow thank you everyone for the exceptionally helpful advice.
I cant find anything on which criteria were used to refuse applications so a FOI request may indeed be necessary.
It's all a bit of a headache isn't it!
You should find the admissions criteria in the admissions handbook. Go on your local authority site and look for this year's copy. It will most likely be a pdf.
When you actually apply next year you will be given your own copy anyway.
I have the criteria - I mean I can't find any info on the basis some applications were refused.
You don't need to force a FOI to your council, you can just phone them and ask for all the schools distances over the phone. There is no reason for them to not give you the information. After they give it verbally, ask for it to be sent via email. If they can't manage this, then they are useless! It is a busy time of year for them however, dealing with 2013 starters. But just be polite and persistent and ask for someone who can give you this info over the phone.
I think faith school may hold their own data though so you need to phone them individually.
You shouldn't need to FOI a council Shattered, but some are famously tight lipped. Mine included, and from the OP saying already that the admissions people won't release distances, a FOI might be the lowest hassle option - stick it in, and just wait for all the answers, in writing, without a million pleading conversations, and then a million more for an email. Thankfully most areas are more open.
I suspect that historically they didn't give it out because most schools weren't under much pressure and not many people asked. Now, with my conspiracy theory hat on, I'd suspect that a big table showing catchments shrinking for every school (bar a few in special measures) might raise some interesting questions about the council's forward planning for the birth rate bulge and about allowing so much new building without infrastructure. Because they way things are going, many areas of my leafy-non-London town are going to become black hole areas in a few years.
It is in the LA's interests to publicise successful applications from the previous year against the criteria to avoid a barrage of FOI requests. I work in an LA and am slightly but not overly surprised that some don't.
As regards them not publishing distances check how relevant this information would be. Where I work most schools have catchment areas and only use distance as a tie break so it is not so important as it may be in some cases.
Before putting in an foi request check that the info isn't readily available in literature from the school or LA and make your request as specific as possible. A lot of requests are so vague that the info provided is unlikely to be what the requester wanted.
I too was wondering this.
as have firm 1st choice.
but 2nd /3rd choice struggling with.
2nd choice possible anyway need to look.
within mile of my house.
no area of prime resposability,
near la border but la told me that diffrent la if nearer in distance gets priority.
Im guessing siblings do too.
if its oversubscribed as usually is
and its mty 2nd preference.
but someone further away than me puts it as their 1st preference.
i dont get my 1st as im too far away out of catchement despite having sibling.
would i get offered school b as 2nd choice purly due to distance?
Yes. As has been said above you don't get any priority for making a school your first preference. If you are higher up the admission criteria, e.g. because you live closer, you get the place.
So really am I right in thinking the best way to look at it is if there are 20 first pref applications, 10 second and 7 third then the school has had 47 applications for, say, 25 places BUT 5 of those offered may fall away as they would have been second/third preferences.
If a school as more FIRST pref applications than places and you live far away then you have a low chance of getting in as all the offers made would have been to first choicers who are most likely to accept (unless they go off to private instead).
Sadly one im thiking of think we still be so far away as lots applications for 3rd choice so of put it down be wasted choice.
When we looked at nearby popular infant school less than half mile head said if dont put it down as 1sct choice we stand no chance.
we put as 2nd but got offered 1st,
then last year one mum said there was some odd choices with people putting it as 1st prefernce not gettig but people putting down as 2nd did.
but this years admissions was oversuscrobed as someone I know who lives closer than me put as 1st and did not get.
also people who lived very close to school due to high sibling intake dident get any of the 60places.
Im so confused what to put down as no 2 or 3 now.
if dont get any can i go on wait list for schools
1 and 2 at same time?
guess my 3rd choice has to be safe one-school dont really want or risk ringing round and asking whois got vacancies not sure which is better gamble.
Join the discussion
Already registered? Log in with:
Please login first.