Advanced search

Corrected age vs birth age

(7 Posts)
Twinmumessex Tue 31-Oct-17 17:28:32

My twins were born at 32 weeks (9 weeks ago) and their 40 week due date was on 23 Oct (1 week ago). I have a week by week baby book which details what to vaguely expect in terms of development each week. But I’m confused as to whether I should be looking at week 1 or week 9! What age do you consider your preemie to be, actual or corrected?
Thanks 😀

stoneagemum Tue 31-Oct-17 17:44:42

12 months minimum apart from vaccination schedules. I had a 32 weeker (Singleton) 15 years ago now so my info may me outdated but that is what I remember re development

stoneagemum Tue 31-Oct-17 17:46:30

Sorry my post didn’t actually answer your post, I would consider your twins 1week old as all these development guidelines are usually written based on studies of term babies

user1471457757 Tue 31-Oct-17 17:59:15

My lb was premature, born at 35 weeks. You should measure their milestones according to their corrected age until they’re two.

KadabrasSpoon Tue 31-Oct-17 18:02:42

Use their corrected age for milestones. Tommys used to have an app - perhaps still do for corrected growth charts. I had a few HVs that didn't understand it so was useful to track myself

Autumnleaves105 Tue 31-Oct-17 18:07:17

My son was born at 27 weeks. He's 2 now and although he's almost caught up I was told by the health visitor that they still consider their corrected age up to 5 years.

Twinmumessex Tue 31-Oct-17 18:11:42

Thanks all!!

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: